According to you. Not everyone agrees with this.
Hindu texts can only be interpreted by realized beings i.e Yogi's who have reached a certain level of enlightenment. Someone who has experienced the teaching of the vedas. People like Shankaracharya or Sadhguru etc.
That's the core problem of your dogma, sir, it has monopolized truth to you.
Not other "interpretation" has any value.
All religions are categorized as a system of beliefs first, search up any social scientific literature and you'll see.
Which is why guru is a sacred term in Hinduism.
Hinduism is not about "beliefs" its about experiences and best practices.
Again, according to you, history shows otherwise. Again variance.
Brahmins could never be kings. At best they could be Prime Minister like the Peshwa's and even those were under exceptional circumstances. Those were the exceptions, not the norm.
Apologies, sir but I specifically told you this is not a discussion on religion but politics and sociology. That was my point, you're pushing religion into it, not I.
The problem is you are trying to interpret and understand Hinduism through the prism of abrahmic religion. Trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
Precisely and according to a lot of people RSS does actions that can be categorized as such as well but you wouldn't agree to that nor explore it, would you?
Its not the label that determine terrorists, it ACTION alone.
With respect, sir, the current 'fire' is of your own politicans doing, not ours. No one asked for your sympathies.
Fighting the fire that is burning your own home down is VERY different from setting fire to somebody's home and then putting out the fire when it spreads to your own home. Such people seldom get sympathy even when they try and play the victim.
I can but please, do indulge me.
So can see where I am going with this.
Do you see the double-speak there? ISIS was also bringing peace through it's purges. So is every group that claims to be so. RSS is no exception. You're intimidating people from speaking and protesting, using state violence against them. Pretty peaceful, eh?
Nobody in India is empowering people who advocate civil violence. The entire Hindutva movement is to destroy people who resort to civil voilence and follow the "direct action" of Jinnah.
So, people shouldn't question RSS or BJP or the Hindutva ideology because they don't have a right to? Quite tolerant here, I must say albeit sarcastically so.
We just saw them trying it again in UP for CAA and we also saw how Hindutva govt. put it down in a few days. That is why there has been NO riots in Gujarat post Godhra. There is no more hope in "direct action" a.k.a Jinnah.
I assure, you, sir that's not the case and heated comments come from both sides, we'll soon share stats to show that. Please, don't play the victim here as you accused me of playing or is it alright for you but not for us? Would make sense.
Opinions are not offensive. Anyway Hindus need a thick skin in pdf. That is just the way it is.
Shall we continue?
