After Blocking India's Vote On Jaish Chief, China Suggests 'Talk To Pak'

[Photon]

Kashmir is UN recognized international issue. Shimla agreement became void after unprovoked violation by Indian army at Siachen named "operation Meghdoot".

No one has got any complain against Azhar, it is only India who is desperate to label him terrorist. Until UN declares Azhar as terrorist, it is only a bi lateral issue b/w us and you.

In today's politics, you don't call your enemies as your foes, you call them terrorists. Right? Interesting world, we live in.

What are you ten years old?

Shimla agreement stands, and if it doesn't then let Pakistani government come out and dissolve it.

Shimla agreement pertains to LOC, and LOC does not run through Siachen.

Massod Azahar is the head of not only UN and Indian designated terrorist organisation but also Pakistani designated terrorist organisation.

Pakistan itself banned JeM , because it tried to assassinate Musharaf.

Head/creator of an international terrorist organisation is by default a terrorist..which Chinese are trying to prevent to save Pakistan from further embarrassment. After all these terrorist are you army stooges.

 

[for truth]

lol.....Since when Azhar even opened his mouth against China or chinese citizens? As far as i read, he is only against the illegal indian occupation of Kashmir. He don't care about anything else

May be you forgot how foreign mount climbers were killed by terrorists in Pakistan.

Terrorists don't care about anything other than to attack innocent civilians.....Pakistan is an living example of this.

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

What are you ten years old?

Shimla agreement stands, and if it doesn't then let Pakistani government come out and dissolve it.

Shimla agreement pertains to LOC, and LOC does not run through Siachen.

Massod Azahar is the head of not only UN and Indian designated terrorist organisation but also Pakistani designated terrorist organisation.

Pakistan itself banned JeM , because it tried to assassinate Musharaf.

Head/creator of an international terrorist organisation is by default a terrorist..which Chinese are trying to prevent to save Pakistan from further embarrassment. After all these terrorist are you army stooges.

You just proved my point......If Pakistan gets solid evidence against any criminal organization/group, it will go after that group. We just cannot start arresting people randomly who are opposing indian occupation of Kashmir.

Siachen adventure was unprovoked, you sshouldn't have done that. It breached the trust on Pakistani side.

Rest of your comment is just bullshit.

May be you forgot how foreign mount climbers were killed by terrorists in Pakistan.

Terrorists don't care about anything other than to attack innocent civilians.....Pakistan is an living example of this.

Terrorists who killed those mountaineers got arrested by us. It has nothing to do with Azhar issue.

 

[for truth]

Terrorists who killed those mountaineers got arrested by us. It has nothing to do with Azhar issue.

It has everything to do with Azhar as those supporting Jihad will kill innocents.

Read the article from BBC for once where they extensively detail about his jihadist activities in Britain and you'll understand that he is more of terror sponsor-er and less a freedom fighter.

 

[Photon]

You just proved my point......If Pakistan gets solid evidence against any criminal organization/group, it will go after that group. We just cannot start arresting people randomly who are opposing indian occupation of Kashmir.

Siachen adventure was unprovoked, you sshouldn't have done that. It breached the trust on Pakistani side.

Rest of your comment is just bullshit.

Even after attempt on Musharaff's life Pakistan did not go after, the declared terrorist organisation, it still continues to function in Pakistan.

Recently after Patahankot attack, Pakistan goverment proudly declared that it had raided and siezed JeM offices in Bahawalpur. And Entire Pakistani media were wondering, how can terrorist organisation which was banned in 2008 , still have offices functioning in Pakistan.

Such is your love affair with anti India terrorists, even when they kill you, you still can't get yourselves to act against them, just because they are against India, they are above the law in Pakistan.

Firstly Siachen did not violate Shimla agreement and secondly J&K acceded to Indian union, so why shouldn't we deploy troops any part of country, especially when we have credible intelligence, Pakistani army was about to launch an operation to capture Siachen.

The fact is Indian forces made it to Siachen in just nick of time, Pakistani forces working on their own plan to capture Siachen, were just three days too late

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

It has everything to do with Azhar as those supporting Jihad will kill innocents.

Read the article from BBC for once where they extensively detail about his jihadist activities in Britain and you'll understand that he is more of terror sponsor-er and less a freedom fighter.

Then why only India shouts on Azhar? Why UK hasn't approached Pakistan on this issue? You are trying to make him a global villain but the reality is that he is only against Indian occupation of Kashmir. Nothing else, no global agenda.

 

[for truth]

Then why only India shouts on Azhar? Why UK hasn't approached Pakistan on this issue? You are trying to make him a global villain but the reality is that he is only against Indian occupation of Kashmir. Nothing else, no global agenda.

UK has pretty much solved its issue by banning him from entering UK.

Are we the only one's trying to make him a global villain?......except china, Everyone was supporting India on declaring him a terrorist by UN (Including UK).

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

Even after attempt on Musharaff's life Pakistan did not go after, the declared terrorist organisation, it still continues to function in Pakistan.

Recently after Patahankot attack, Pakistan goverment proudly declared that it had raided and siezed JeM offices in Bahawalpur. And Entire Pakistani media were wondering, how can terrorist organisation which was banned in 2008 , still have offices functioning in Pakistan.

Such is your love affair with anti India terrorists, even when they kill you, you still can't get yourselves to act against them, just because they are against India, they are above the law in Pakistan.

Firstly Siachen did not violate Shimla agreement and secondly J&K acceded to Indian union, so why shouldn't we deploy troops any part of country, especially when we have credible intelligence, Pakistani army was about to launch an operation to capture Siachen.

The fact is Indian forces made it to Siachen in just nick of time, Pakistani forces working on their own plan to capture Siachen, were just three days too late

So, we captured those guys as we may have had some intel, false or true, i don't know but we didn't touch Azhar, may be because we didn't have enough evidence to go after him?

Don't repeat this terrorist mantra again and again. It is boring me now. You want to talk about terrorism? Start with 1971, Ltte (tamil tigers in Srilanka), sabotaging Pakistani state through western border (via iran and Afghanistan). Oh how can i forget Kulbhusan jhadev?

UK has pretty much solved its issue by banning him from entering UK.

Are we the only one's trying to make him a global villain?......except china, Everyone was supporting India on declaring him a terrorist by UN (Including UK).

World's support India due to economic interests not because it has some validity on issues like of Azhar.

Just recently, Uk appreciated Pakistan's fight against terrorism.

 

[Place Of Space]

You just proved my point......If Pakistan gets solid evidence against any criminal organization/group, it will go after that group. We just cannot start arresting people randomly who are opposing indian occupation of Kashmir.

Siachen adventure was unprovoked, you sshouldn't have done that. It breached the trust on Pakistani side.

Rest of your comment is just bullshit.



Terrorists who killed those mountaineers got arrested by us. It has nothing to do with Azhar issue.

This post says something.

As long as Pakistan don't ask for Indian assistances to deal with terrorists, that isn't Indian affairs. And in my opinion, Indian intention referring to the UN ban is not in order to get supports from Pakistan, but want to bash Pakistan and China about anti-terrorism operation.

Basically, Pakistan is still one of most serious victim of Terrorism. I believe Pakistan will to cooperate with all nations to dissolve the problem, but Indian intention and methods this time is not suitable.

 

[Photon]

So, we captured those guys as we may have had some intel, false or true, i don't know but we didn't touch Azhar, may be because we didn't have enough evidence to go after him?

Don't repeat this terrorist mantra again and again. It is boring me now. You want to talk about terrorism? Start with 1971, Ltte (tamil tigers in Srilanka), sabotaging Pakistani state through western border (via iran and Afghanistan). Oh how can i forget Kulbhusan jhadev?

You captured those guy because you were under international pressure capture terrorist involved in Patahankot and then after that nothing.

As far Mukti Bahini is concerned they were not terrorist, no country in the world , including Pakistan accuses them of being terrorists, they were Pakistani who had risen up to avenge Pakistani army's atrocities, picked from 10 million Pakistanis who had fled to India , to escape Pakistani army's massacres.

 

[for truth]

World's support India due to economic interests not because it has some validity on issues like of Azhar.

Just recently, Uk appreciated Pakistan's fight against terrorism.

Take a pause, read what you just have said. An unsubstantiated, ludicrous personal opinion of yours...

As long as Pakistan don't ask for Indian assistance's to deal with terrorists, that isn't Indian affairs.And in my opinion, Indian intention referring to the UN ban is not in order to get supports from Pakistan, but want to bash Pakistan and China about anti-terrorism operation.

This Gold, Absolute GOLD.....such a beautiful opinion.

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

This post says something.

As long as Pakistan don't ask for Indian assistances to deal with terrorists, that isn't Indian affairs. And in my opinion, Indian intention referring to the UN ban is not in order to get supports from Pakistan, but want to bash Pakistan and China about anti-terrorism operation.

Basically, Pakistan is still one of most serious victim of Terrorism. I believe Pakistan will to cooperate with all nations to dissolve the problem, but Indian intention and methods this time is not suitable.

Indians should not preach what they do not practice themselves. They wanted to blackmail us. Thanks to China, for its principal stand.

We are already cooperating with world regarding terrorism. We along with China are involved in quadrilateral peace process. I hope we succeed in that process.

 

[my2cents]

Very sensible move by China......When Pakistan raises Kashmir issue in world, Indians say, it is a bilateral issue, why make noise in the world?

But these bloody Indians take Azhar issue to UNSC.....Why? It is also a bilateral issue.....

Very sensible China, very sensible. You have embarrassed Indians on their own logic. Indians don't left face anymore....

It is a bilateral issue because you signed the damned document. Read up your history.

Well when a Country elects a declared terrorist as their PM atleast in Pakistan these freedom fighters whom u claim terrorist have all the right to do what they can.

Does that include blowing up your people???

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

You captured those guy because you were under international pressure capture terrorist involved in Patahankot and then after that nothing.

As far Mukti Bahini is concerned they were not terrorist, no country in the world , including Pakistan accuses them of being terrorists, they were Pakistani who had risen up to avenge Pakistani army's atrocities, picked from 10 million Pakistanis who had fled to India , to escape Pakistani army's massacres.

International pressure, my foot!!! Pakistan itself wanted to have good relations with you, thats why pakistan had sent a JIT team to India for investigating this "Pathankot incident" (to find out whether Azhar is involved or not).

When Pakistan has sent an investigation team to establish whether Azhar Masood was involved or not, why did India take his name to UN. Either wait for final Investigation report and then decide or don't have investigation team and go to UN. You have shot yourselves in the foot here.

Don't cry, now.

Take a pause, read what you just have said. An unsubstantiated, ludicrous personal opinion of yours...

Majority is not always right, right. It doesn't matter even if whole world supports India because in today's world you can get support through propaganda and other interests.

Whole world supported/fell for the propaganda of US against Iraq in neutralizing WMDs, what happened then? Has US found anything close to WMDs in Iraq? So, majority is not always right.

It is a bilateral issue because you signed the damned document. Read up your history.

It is UN recognized international issue. Kashmir has not been discarded from UN's list of unresolved disputes. Mutual understanding of Pakistan and India in shimla agreement is irrelevant here.

 

[I.R.A]

We should allow the JEM chief and Masood Azhar and other rats to roam free in Pakistan giving speeches in premier Engineering Universities. We know how that will turn out in 5- 10 years down the line.

What do you mean by allow? ............ Pakistan hasn't asked for Indian permission ........................ try otherwise and see what happens if you don't allow.