After Blocking India's Vote On Jaish Chief, China Suggests 'Talk To Pak'

[scholseys]

Diplomatic bitch slap, I am understating here

 

[Max]

Even if Massod Azhar or Hafiz saeed are not there, there are enough radicals to take their place in that country. Jihad against infidels is in their blood and it will not go. One call for Jihad from the middle east or Militants groups against India these guys will take up arms. Because they believe in that.

Saying a bharti, Your prime minister is a terrorist who killed thousand of Muslims in Gujrat, his entry was banned in Europe and USA, . your country is ruled by people who believe in hindutva and hindu rashtra.. care about gangaland..

RSS= Parent party of BJP (the ruling Indian party)

Modi is also member of RSS..

RSS involved in terror blasts in India, says Home Secretary

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/r...asts-in-india-says-home-secretary-598195.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RSS India's No.1 Terror Group: Former Mumbai Police Officer

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nat...-Police-Officer/2015/11/26/article3148195.ece

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hindu hardline RSS who see Modi as their own

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-29593336


give us lecture when Hafiz Saeed become MP let alone PM..

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Title said what?
Get a life moron .
You should have been show this trolling when we send those 3 brigades to stop your jumping ,when your Xi was in a visit in India .

Take it easy dude , the title said China don't have business with Azhar affaire, don't drag China into your problem.

Very sensible move by China......When Pakistan raises Kashmir issue in world, Indians say, it is a bilateral issue, why make noise in the world?

But these bloody Indians take Azhar issue to UNSC.....Why? It is also a bilateral issue.....

Very sensible China, very sensible. You have embarrassed Indians on their own logic. Indians don't left face anymore....

Did India really say that Kashmir is bilateral issue ? if it's the case than it's hypocritical to bring Ashar issue into UN. China is right to ask India to settle this issue bilaterally with Pakistan.

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

Did India really say that Kashmir is bilateral issue ? if it's the case than it's hypocritical to bring Ashar issue into UN. China is right to ask India to settle this issue bilaterally with Pakistan.

Yes, external affairs minister of India said it is a bilateral issue, so no question of UN intervention..........US also termed Kashmir as a bilateral issue when we asked US to pressurize India over Kashmir.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...n-says-salman-khurshid-pakistan/1/247138.html

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ir-issue-says-its-between-india-and-pakistan/

That's why i am saying that Indians or any other organization/country can't blame China if China asks India to solve this Azhar issue with Pakistan....

 

[Umair Nawaz]

We should allow the JEM chief and Masood Azhar and other rats to roam free in Pakistan giving speeches in premier Engineering Universities. We know how that will turn out in 5- 10 years down the line.

Well when a Country elects a declared terrorist as their PM atleast in Pakistan these freedom fighters whom u claim terrorist have all the right to do what they can.

 

[Endeavour]

Since china is openly supporting terror against india now they have lost any right to complaint if in future india supports uighyurs and tibetans in india.

We should held a conference hosting both uighyurs and tibetans, and if china complaints we should suggest them to talk to dalai lama and Dokun isa.

 

[xyxmt]

This is the correct title

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...n-Masood-Azhar-China/articleshow/51994964.cms

Not sure why China has to do all this circus of blocking the resolution and asking India to talk to Pakistan.

Does that mean China indirectly supporting terror against India?

no they are telling you who is the Boss in Asia

Since china is openly supporting terror against india now they have lost any right to complaint if in future india supports uighyurs and tibetans in india.

We should held a conference hosting both uighyurs and tibetans, and if china complaints we should suggest them to talk to dalai lama and Dokun isa.

you mean to say If India Attempts to support Uighyurs and then back tracks

 

[for truth]

Did India really say that Kashmir is bilateral issue ? if it's the case than it's hypocritical to bring Ashar issue into UN. China is right to ask India to settle this issue bilaterally with Pakistan.

After 1971 war, Pakistan signed a treaty with India where it agreed to resolve the issue of Kashmir bilaterally.

So, it wasn't India alone to label this issue as "bilateral".

This is the issue between pakistan and India, and both countries should show enough maturity to resolve the dispute bilaterally, else south asia will become playground for foreign powers. A true lasting solution for kashmir can only come from India and Pakistan, not from outside.

China was not right to ask the issue of Azhar to be bilateral because all other countries were supportive of India's stance.

Secondly, the UN vote would hardly matter. The only thing it would've done in effect was to label him a terrorist and ban him from travelling outside his country, and may be ban his affiliated organisations from getting funds internationally.

Just for a change, why don't you read about him on Wikipedia? May be that will give you a clear picture.

But if you're too lazy for that, here..........


Masood Azhar: The man who brought jihad to Britain

The title said all, no further comment (article from BBC)

Even the British very well know about his international jihadist activities....

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Since china is openly supporting terror against india now they have lost any right to complaint if in future india supports uighyurs and tibetans in india.

We should held a conference hosting both uighyurs and tibetans, and if china complaints we should suggest them to talk to dalai lama and Dokun isa.

Please provide us with evident that we have any link with India terrorist to backup your claim that we support terror in India if you have any. But it's wrong to use Uyghur or Tibetan issues to blackmail China, and certainty you don't want neither to see China to grant an audience to all independent movement and rebels leaders (Maoist, ULFA, Kalistan...) in India right?. I think it's wise that India should solve the problem at the source and not dragg China into your mess.

 

[Photon]

Very sensible move by China......When Pakistan raises Kashmir issue in world, Indians say, it is a bilateral issue, why make noise in the world?

But these bloody Indians take Azhar issue to UNSC.....Why? It is also a bilateral issue.....

Very sensible China, very sensible. You have embarrassed Indians on their own logic. Indians don't left face anymore....

Because Massod Azahar is a terrorist and terrorism is a global issue, where as Kashmir is a bilateral issue after Shimla agreement.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

After 1971 war, Pakistan signed a treaty with India where it agreed to resolve the issue of Kashmir bilaterally.

So, it wasn't India alone to label this issue as "bilateral".

This is the issue between pakistan and India, and both countries should show enough maturity to resolve the dispute bilaterally, else south asia will become playground for foreign powers. A true lasting solution for kashmir can only come from India and Pakistan, not from outside.

China was not right to ask the issue of Azhar to be bilateral because all other countries were supportive of India's stance.

Secondly, the UN vote would hardly matter. The only thing it would've done in effect was to label him a terrorist and ban him from travelling outside his country, and may be ban his affiliated organisations from getting funds internationally.

Just for a change, why don't you read about him on Wikipedia? May be that will give you a clear picture.

But if you're too lazy for that, here..........


Masood Azhar: The man who brought jihad to Britain

The title said all, no further comment (article from BBC)

Even the British very well know about his international jihadist activities....

Not because other countries support India mean China has to be agree with the majority. The way India think of China's vote in UN over Masood affaire is "be with us or against us",.it just won't work that way, China has the freedom to decide and judge according to our perception of reality and not of what majority think.

Britain is careless regarding our concern over Uyghur issue, China certainly don't care neither of what Britain has to say about Masood Azhar if that man brought Jihad or not

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

Because Massod Azahar is a terrorist and terrorism is a global issue, where as Kashmir is a bilateral issue after Shimla agreement.

Kashmir is UN recognized international issue. Shimla agreement became void after unprovoked violation by Indian army at Siachen named "operation Meghdoot".

No one has got any complain against Azhar, it is only India who is desperate to label him terrorist. Until UN declares Azhar as terrorist, it is only a bi lateral issue b/w us and you.

In today's politics, you don't call your enemies as your foes, you call them terrorists. Right? Interesting world, we live in.

 

[for truth]

Not because other countries support India mean China has to be agree with the majority.

The majority of the countries were supportive of India because they very well know the terrorist activities of Azhar--- it is not because India forced other countries to support India.

If we don't restrict him today, his activities will go grow multi-fold, and one day, some Chinese toursists travelling in some western or eastern country may become victims to his terrorist activities. May be then the Chinese will understand.

The way India think of China's vote in UN over Masood affaire is "be with us or against us",.it just won't work that way, China has the freedom to decide and judge according to our perception of reality and not of what majority think.

It was never about "with us or against us"...as you seem to suggest, it was about "Help us to bring justice by banning an international jihadi". And there is enough evidence even in international sphere to tell of his jihadist activities, if that doesn't tell what it is, then what will? As a reason, I also told you to read Wikipedia and even quoted the BBC article(if you aren't happy about Wikipedia) of what he has been doing and what all he has done till now...

Britain is careless regarding our concern over Uyghur issue, China certainly don't care neither of what Britain has to say about Masood Azhar if that man brought Jihad or not

in recent past, there were reports of Britain endorsing china in its disputes with India. Britain vetoed against imposition of taxes on imported Chinese steel by European union, there by helping Chinese steel exports...many many instances.

And Britain is not immediate neighbor to China or India. But India is to china and china is to India. What happens in India will impact China and vice versa....WE cannot remain careless. Something you need to understand.

 

[PaklovesTurkiye]

After 1971 war, Pakistan signed a treaty with India where it agreed to resolve the issue of Kashmir bilaterally.

So, it wasn't India alone to label this issue as "bilateral".

This is the issue between pakistan and India, and both countries should show enough maturity to resolve the dispute bilaterally, else south asia will become playground for foreign powers. A true lasting solution for kashmir can only come from India and Pakistan, not from outside.

China was not right to ask the issue of Azhar to be bilateral because all other countries were supportive of India's stance.

Secondly, the UN vote would hardly matter. The only thing it would've done in effect was to label him a terrorist and ban him from travelling outside his country, and may be ban his affiliated organisations from getting funds internationally.

Just for a change, why don't you read about him on Wikipedia? May be that will give you a clear picture.

But if you're too lazy for that, here..........


Masood Azhar: The man who brought jihad to Britain

The title said all, no further comment (article from BBC)

Even the British very well know about his international jihadist activities....

Shimla agreement became void the moment Indians started unprovoked operation against us...named Meghdoot.

The majority of the countries were supportive of India because they very well know the terrorist activities of Azhar--- it is not because India forced other countries to support India.

If we don't restrict him today, his activities will go grow multi-fold, and one day, some Chinese toursists travelling in some western or eastern country may become victims to his terrorist activities. May be then the Chinese will understand.
.

lol.....Since when Azhar even opened his mouth against China or chinese citizens? As far as i read, he is only against the illegal indian occupation of Kashmir. He don't care about anything else.

 

[Endeavour]

Please provide us with evident that we have any link with India terrorist to backup your claim that we support terror in India if you have any. But it's wrong to use Uyghur or Tibetan issues to blackmail China, and certainty you don't want neither to see China to grant an audience to all independent movement and rebels leaders (Maoist, ULFA, Kalistan...) in India right?. I think it's wise that India should solve the problem at the source and not dragg China into your mess.

China got itself involved in the mess by blocking the UN bid for masood azhar.
India did not suggest china to do so, china did it on itself, so stop blaming others it was your own choice to get involved in the mess.

Had china restrained from blocking the bid, inda wud had solved the issue on its own, but since china made a point and got itself involved in the issue, india will now accept china in this debate of terror. You wanted to be the party of this debate, then so be it, we welcome you in this game of terror.