What's new

Afghan Taliban and US deal is almost there

What are we getting in return for facilitating this peace process?

Peanuts, mangoes,, non NATO ally status?

What is it?
 
. . .
At least when Pakistan makes a deal to jointly develop and manufacture fighter jets, it gets it done right. Whereas india, the largest military hardware importer in the world, spends a decade on the MMRCA, and can't get it right. Needless to say, that for the Flankers, india dragged it's feet for (again) a decade before reaching some sort of deal on MRO, despite assembling the aircraft in country.

Don't yap while walking on egg shells.


Fighter jet jf17 job is an assembly job , just like to fit new battery in your mobile phone . China gives part Pakistan joins it at assembly lines nothing else.
 
.
Fighter jet jf17 job is an assembly job , just like to fit new battery in your mobile phone . China gives part Pakistan joins it at assembly lines nothing else.

Please, do continue with your incoherent ramble and validate your exhibited characteristics of zero IQ buffoon. No really, it is entertaining.
 
. . . .
None of your God damn business!! We clear on that now?
Sure. You are invoking an identity fallacy: "When one's argument is evaluated based on their physical or social identity, i.e., their social class, generation, ethnic group, gender or sexual orientation, profession, occupation or subgroup when the strength of the argument is independent of identity."

Because the same question could have been asked by a Pakistani as well as a Zionist, you know.
 
.
Super power beaters are begging for the bailout packages...:D

Your wording is unfortunate, but please keep in mind that pursuing national interests is paramount in international geopolitics for all countries, no matter what it takes. If Pakistan is begging for a bailout, then USA is equally begging for help in Afghanistan. It is a two way street for both sides for mutual benefits.
 
.
Sure. You are invoking an identity fallacy: "When one's argument is evaluated based on their physical or social identity, i.e., their social class, generation, ethnic group, gender or sexual orientation, profession, occupation or subgroup when the strength of the argument is independent of identity."

Because the same question could have been asked by a Pakistani as well as a Zionist, you know.

To my countrymen, I say that I do not support the man, rather the principle and morals of my faith. If the leader and the nation of Pakistan remain faithful to Allah, there is no rhym or reason to give any explanation.

To a zionist I would say, "better start praying, because the count down has begun."
 
.
Back
Top Bottom