What's new

Afghan official: U.S. airstrikes hit ISIS radio station, kill 29 militants

RabzonKhan

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 1, 2008
Messages
4,289
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
We should also target Taliban, giving them a pass is a wrong policy and makes no sense whatsoever.


Afghan official: U.S. airstrikes hit ISIS radio station, kill 29 militants


By Greg Botelho and Masoud Popalzai, CNN
February 2, 2016

(CNN) U.S. airstrikes in eastern Afghanistan killed 29 ISIS fighters and struck the terrorist group's FM radio station, signaling American forces' continued military action in the war-torn nation -- albeit against a different entity that brought them there in the first place.

The strikes occurred Monday evening in Nangarhar province, according to Ataullah Khogyani, a spokesman for that province's governor. Khogyani said the 29 killed included eight ISIS members who worked on the group's radio and online efforts.

Until then, ISIS propaganda could be heard on the radio station in Nangarhar's capital of Jalalabad. Khogyani said the U.S. strikes not only hit the radio facility but destroyed the Islamic extremist group's internet equipment.

U.S. Army Col. Michael Lawhorn, a spokesman for American forces in Afghanistan, confirmed "two counterterrorism strikes" in Nangarhar province. But he declined to offer details, like what was targeted, what was actually hit and how many people died as a result.

Last month, the State Department's formal designation of ISIS in Afghanistan and Pakistan as a terrorist organization led to a change in the rules of engagement for U.S. forces, according to U.S. defense officials. Specifically, it meant that the U.S. military now has the legal authority to strike against targets tied to the terror group in Afghanistan -- a country where the United States, under President Barack Obama, had steadily been decreasing its military role.

ISIS seen as growing threat in Afghanistan

Afghanistan has been beset by militant organizations for years, with the Taliban and al Qaeda notorious among them. A U.S.-led invasion following the September 11, 2001, attacks ousted the Taliban from power and forced al Qaeda on the run -- though now, more than 14 years later, both groups maintain an active, violent presence in Afghanistan.

But the are not the only ones. ISIS, in particular, has emerged in recent months to become a feared terrorist entity worldwide and in Afghanistan, in particular.

Since planting a foothold in Syria and Iraq as the self-declared Islamic State, this group has carried out or inspired attacks elsewhere in Asia, Africa and Europe. CNN first reported last March about its recruiting push in that country, on that appears to have targeted disaffected Taliban.

That same month, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani warned the U.S. Congress about the "terrible threat" the group poses to his country and its neighbors.

"Terrorists neither recognize boundaries nor require passports to spread their message of hate and discord,"Ghani said.

The commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan told Congress last fall that between 1,000 and 3,000 active ISIS members were in Afghanistan.

Gen. John Campbell added, "We have observed the movement's increased recruiting efforts and growing operational capacity."

ISIS has been particularly active in Nangarhar province. It claimed responsibility for a motorbike suicide bombing at a Jalalabad bank last April that killed 33 people. And earlier this month, the group issued a statement on affiliated media saying it was behind a bloody attack outside the Pakistani Consulate in the same eastern Afghan city.



 
.
nice, we won that battle but we are losing the war.
 
.
nice, we won that battle but we are losing the war.
US has too many interconnected and mixed interest with different parties and thats the reason its not able to tackle terrorism and dosen't seems like in near future too
 
.
US has too many interconnected and mixed interest with different parties and thats the reason its not able to tackle terrorism and dosen't seems like in near future too

we create terrorism. the only way to beat terrorism is through education and understanding. we keep making things worse.
 
. .
nice, we won that battle but we are losing the war.
Not really, ISIS is losing the war. That doesn't mean they'll die out completely, once ISIS disintegrates; There will need to be a political solution in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, if ISIS is going to disappear.
 
.
Not really, ISIS is losing the war. That doesn't mean they'll die out completely, once ISIS disintegrates; There will need to be a political solution in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, if ISIS is going to disappear.


if ISIS is losing which they aren't...all they have to do is lay low, and continue to commit terrorist attacks . they can fade right back into the civilian population.
 
Last edited:
.
How do we know they hit 29 militants?
d5ilaguoggb3gi1inbmwfumm1.656x833x1.jpg
 
.
We should also target Taliban, giving them a pass is a wrong policy and makes no sense whatsoever.


Afghan official: U.S. airstrikes hit ISIS radio station, kill 29 militants


By Greg Botelho and Masoud Popalzai, CNN
February 2, 2016

(CNN) U.S. airstrikes in eastern Afghanistan killed 29 ISIS fighters and struck the terrorist group's FM radio station, signaling American forces' continued military action in the war-torn nation -- albeit against a different entity that brought them there in the first place.

The strikes occurred Monday evening in Nangarhar province, according to Ataullah Khogyani, a spokesman for that province's governor. Khogyani said the 29 killed included eight ISIS members who worked on the group's radio and online efforts.

Until then, ISIS propaganda could be heard on the radio station in Nangarhar's capital of Jalalabad. Khogyani said the U.S. strikes not only hit the radio facility but destroyed the Islamic extremist group's internet equipment.

Ha Ha egg on the face of Zaid Hamid and his followers on this forum who were saying that this FM station was operating from an US base.
 
.
if ISIS is losing which they aren't...all they have to do is lay low, and continue to commit terrorist attacks . they can fade right back into the civilian population.
ISIS isn't like other organizations, ISIS actually controls territory and are trying to build a state. They've been losing that territory by huge chunks, and they've been losing support as well. They can't just "fade" into the population, they'd lose everything they have.

ISIS IS losing, and it's losing badly.
 
. . .
And what if those thermal signatures were civilians?

They are sometime a sad part of war but before that three steps are taken as protocol.

1. Intelligence from informers.
2. Photos from a Recce Drone which shows that there are armed people in the compound.
3. The final painting of the target by a SF team who must confirm that High Value target was onsite.

In this case if you had bothered to read it was a hostile radio station which was targeted while it was transmitting and hence anyone in that compound will be considered hostile. FLIR cameras now used can now make out a silhouette of an weapon and the software can confirm what type it is. The PAF uses an older version of this tech on their F-16 but you won't crib when they bomb a village and kill some deadly terrorist BUT their innocent families too. WILL YOU?
 
. .
We should also target Taliban, giving them a pass is a wrong policy and makes no sense whatsoever.
It's an 'enemy of my enemy' policy for now. ISIS/Daesh is seen as a far greater global threat than the Afghan Taliban currently. In any case, ISIS/Daesh fighters and leaders in Afghanistan did not sprout out of thin air or migrate from Iraq/Syria - they are overwhelmingly 'converts' from the Taliban.

Targeting Daesh/ISIS and allied groups in Afghanistan is in essence a targeting of the 'irreconcilable and extreme' factions of the Afghan Taliban.

1. Intelligence from informers.
2. Photos from a Recce Drone which shows that there are armed people in the compound.
3. The final painting of the target by a SF team who must confirm that High Value target was onsite.
With the drawdown of US troops, 'intelligence from the ground' is largely sourced from the NDS and ANA, and the debacle the NDS/ANA created with the MSF hospital (and their continued refusal to acknowledge their mistake) does not offer a lot of 'comfort' in terms of how consistently accurate the intel is.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom