Foinikas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
- Messages
- 12,710
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Your english is weird. What exactly are you saying?Why go for limited why not wholesale once and for all if you are going for that angle
you are slow
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your english is weird. What exactly are you saying?Why go for limited why not wholesale once and for all if you are going for that angle
you are slow
When there are droughts and no water for AFG, where do Iranians expect them to produce water? It was very foolish of Iranian Gov this week issuing threats to Kabul this whole stupidity incident is Irans own making
Agreed thats what I am saying. Iran wanted to gain some points out of nothing. There President was on a visit to Pak and ended up chest thumping by threatening Taliban out of nowhere.
Taliban responded in kind attacking Irani border posts with rapid reaction forces penetrating as far as 4-5 miles into Iran and killing/capturing Irani soldiers. Now the ball is in Irans court.
The Arabs who hated Shias for centuries have finally moved on from propagating and committing violence against them. You are the only Islamic country in the world that does that. Shows how immature you are.Those shias would be made Sunni overnight by the Taliban if they act against the state.
Shias were erased from North of Afghanistan the first time they made mutiny against Taliban in the 90s.
This is not Syria or Lebanon, were Iran can play games. This is Afghanistan. Even a threat is answered with an attack.
The Soviets and NATO didn't try to break Afghanistan, they instead tried to keep the Afghan nation together and bring them under their respective control.Who is gonna break Afghanistan will you send angles from the sky NATO tried and so did Soviet union.. When will people learn.. You just gotta leave the Afghans alone they don't have intentions beyond their borders. All their wars was defensive in nature and who is willing to repeat that mistake again and again.
Don't translate some irrelevant border fire by invididuals at the borders on both sides. There is no political intention from the core gov't to change borders or become hostile towards anyone. Why do people find it worthy to actully misintepret their intentions
They have issues with Tajikistan and Uzbekistan as well. Their armies are sitting on the border in case they try any other misadventure.First Afghans attacked Pakistan and had their arse whipped, now they are trying with Iran.
The Soviets and NATO didn't try to break Afghanistan, they instead tried to keep the Afghan nation together and bring them under their respective control.
This is why both failed.
Breaking Afghanistan is far easier.
No one is misinterpreting anything, Afghanistan as a state has a history of disunity and hostility towards its neighbors.
Agreed thats what I am saying. Iran wanted to gain some points out of nothing. There President was on a visit to Pak and ended up chest thumping by threatening Taliban out of nowhere.
Taliban responded in kind attacking Irani border posts with rapid reaction forces penetrating as far as 4-5 miles into Iran and killing/capturing Irani soldiers. Now the ball is in Irans court.
Trying to explain that to people is like shouting in the wind my friend, it is a fruitless exercise. If the yanks really wanted they could have levelled the country in a flash and called it a day, Afghanistan was an experiment in nation building, but an expensive one and one they will not soon repeat. Having worked in Afghanistan as you know I have mentioned before; it was surreal, outside of Kabul everything was underdeveloped, corrupt ALP (Local Police) roamed and demanded bakhsheesh and were basically Taliban in government uniforms.The Soviets and NATO didn't try to break Afghanistan, they instead tried to keep the Afghan nation together and bring them under their respective control.
This is why both failed.
Breaking Afghanistan is far easier.
No one is misinterpreting anything, Afghanistan as a state has a history of disunity and hostility towards its neighbors.
After yesterday’s message to Taliban by Saif al Adl’s father in law, I agree with you. Taliban will be alone in this fight and even have opposition from within. The timing is very important tho. Nothing happening should be taken at face value.They are going to get hammered by the Iranians.
The timing is key, why now? Especially when you think about what is happening in the region and top level negotiations.After yesterday’s message to Taliban by Saif al Adl’s father in law, I agree with you. Taliban will be alone in this fight and even have opposition from within. The timing is very important tho. Nothing happening should be taken at face value.
Long story short - If the US wanted the Afghan war could have ended in one day!
No,it's not the same thing. You know why they both failed?Tomato or tamoto same shit. They tried to subdue Afghanistan it didn't work they came with the best forces, technologny everything.
Afghanistan has approx 100m sleeper cells in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan itself this will open up a gap and strifes behind enemy lines example Imam Rahman of Tajikistan will go out in days becasue the whole country has zillions of sleeper cells the same in Uzbekistan. IEA has always been the tip of an iceberg