What's new

Abdali : a hero or villian for Pakistani punjabis?

.
Hero because he defeated the Maratha's in the historic battle of 3rd battle of panipat
I am a liberal guy myself , but that does not take away the fact that the Maratha's were the primary force that defeated the Mughals & also promoted their Dharmic swaraj & thus needed to be defeated .

This question is for Pakistani Punjabis in special, Pakistanis in general but comments of Indians are also welcomed as they are also relevant.


Punjabi or not ,that bloody Ranjeet Singh is absolutely hated in Pakistan & Punjabis are Pakistanis first, they speak Urdu & they have nothing to do with this filthy DOG, the sin of the soil Pakistani Punjab were washed off with the blood of the Muslims of Punjab during the partition, & nobody likes him in Pakistan , in Punjab the language & culture is Urdu , Mughal culture is what is followed with pride & there is absolutely no place for the gaon ka gawar Bhangra culture of ranjeet singh in Pakistan, I can go and abuse ranjeet singh in the middle of Lahore & nobody can even touch me, but I can guarantee you that if anybody even remotely praises Ranjeet Singh, I can beat the living crap out of that person & nobody can even touch me & I am a muhajir, bro trust me nobody likes this guy one bit, people see him as an black stain & burden of our geographic history, so wish this chap would have been born in east Punjab instead of our side:hitwall:
 
Last edited:
.
Given that barring Ranjeet Singh, pakistani punjabis have not any genuine heroes to worship, I guess they have no choice but to worship foreign invaders. Some of them would build towers of human skulls in what is now pakistan... for example, look at the number of pakistani punjabis named taimur... its really a sorry picture.

Hero because he defeated the Maratha's in the historic battle of 3rd battle of panipat
I am a liberal guy myself , but that does not take away the fact that the Maratha's were the primary force that defeated the Mughals & also promoted their Dharmic swaraj & thus needed to be defeated .

What was Dharmic about Marathas, other than that they were Hindus? Or are you saying Hindus in Hindustan needed to be defeated? How many Masjids did Marathas destroy like the Muslims did with Hindu temples? Did they slap reverse Jaziya? Then what was the ''need to defeat'' Marathas using foreign invaders???

Infact the act of declaring jihad against Hindus in their own land is just islamic imperialism, nothing less.
 
Last edited:
.
Identity crisis. Praising invaders.

How is it identity crisis, I am a pakistani a Pukhtoon and there are millions like me who are Pakistani Pukhtoons, so was Abdali so why shouldn't we praise him?.

He shares our blood our language our heritage so tell me why can't we praise him?.

Pakistan is a bit bigger then you think, but I can't expect your tiny brain to understand that.

Given that barring Ranjeet Singh, pakistani punjabis have not any genuine heroes to worship, I guess they have no choice but to worship foreign invaders. Some of them would build towers of human skulls in what is now pakistan... for example, look at the number of pakistani punjabis named taimur... its really a sorry picture.



What was Dharmic about Marathas, other than that they were Hindus? Or are you saying Hindus in Hindustan needed to be defeated? How many Masjids did Marathas destroy like the Muslims did with Hindu temples? Did they slap reverse Jaziya? Then what was the ''need to defeat'' Marathas using foreign invaders???

Infact the act of declaring jihad against Hindus in their own land is just islamic iperialism, nothing less.

Wasn't it a sad picture when Indians were giving their daughters to Turco Afghans and serving in their armies, building infrastructure for them?.

Self reflect before you say this is a sad picture.

Was it not a sad picture Indians in bed once again with another party the British, so sad that to this day they even adopted their language.

Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Given that barring Ranjeet Singh, pakistani punjabis have not any genuine heroes to worship, I guess they have no choice but to worship foreign invaders. Some of them would build towers of human skulls in what is now pakistan... for example, look at the number of pakistani punjabis named taimur... its really a sorry picture.



What was Dharmic about Marathas, other than that they were Hindus? Or are you saying Hindus in Hindustan needed to be defeated? How many Masjids did Marathas destroy like the Muslims did with Hindu temples? Did they slap reverse Jaziya? Then what was the ''need to defeat'' Marathas using foreign invaders???

Infact the act of declaring jihad against Hindus in their own land is just islamic imperialism, nothing less.
The Punjab and the rest of Pakistan could have flourished under the Maratha rule. During the British period the princely states that were ruled by the Maratha rulers in Gujarat and Maharashtra were the most developed regions of whole India.
Even today Maharashtra and Gujarat are some of the most developed regions of South Asia.
On the other hand Pakistan and Afghanistan are today the least developed regions of South Asia because these regions
were for a long time under Turkic rule.
 
.
The Punjab and the rest of Pakistan could have flourished under the Maratha rule. During the British period the princely states that were ruled by the Maratha rulers in Gujarat and Maharashtra were the most developed regions of whole India.
Even today Maharashtra and Gujarat are some of the most developed regions of South Asia.
On the other hand Pakistan and Afghanistan are today the least developed regions of South Asia because these regions
were for a long time under Turkic rule.

Well by that logic India should be still under the British as they introduced industry, railways education etc etc don't you think?.
 
.
NORTHERN_INDIA_1780_by_hellbat.jpg


map of Punjab showing general areas of Sikh misls.
 
.
Well by that logic India should be still under the British as they introduced industry, railways education etc etc don't you think?.
No, eastern India was for the longest time under direct British rule and today eastern India is the least developed region
of India. On the other hand the most developed state of India is Kerala because Kerala was never under British rule.
 
.
No, eastern India was for the longest time under direct British rule and today eastern India is the least developed region
of India. On the other hand the most developed state of India is Kerala because Kerala was never under British rule.

Oh please that's just nonsense, atleast try to feed your people before making such tall claims.

Now you run it yourself and it's poverty ridden, so we seen the ability of you people.

Shining India is just for a few the rest you can read up on international media.
 
.
Wasn't it a sad picture when Indians were giving their daughters to Turco Afghans and serving in their armies, building infrastructure for them?.

Self reflect before you say this is a sad picture.

Was it not a sad picture Indians in bed once again with another party the British, so sad that to this day they even adopted their language.

Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Try to be more logical next time. Indians do not consider foreign invaders, particularly those who were into raping and massacering locals our heroes. That disctinction goes to Pakistanis. Even Indian Christians do not consifer British invaders and imperialists heroes, and indian christians also do not claim they ruled us because the british did.

Its sad that pakistani punjabis have to worship foreign invaders who looted, killed and raped them as their heroes. Its a fact. If they had any local muslim punjabi heroes to worship, they would not be reduced to naming their children taimur who was brutal on the people of today's pakistan.
 
. .
Ahmad Shah Abdali was perhaps a bit of a looter but there really wasnt much in Pakistani Punjab to loot , most of Pakistani Punjab is made up of rivers , river beds and agricultural lands and most people are a associated with agriculture even today , so exactly what was it that Abdali could loot from farmers ? not much other than their crops but there really aren't that many account of crop looting by Ahmad Shah , which explains why opinions about Abdali in Pakistanis Punjab range from indifference to appriciation, mainly for attacking Hindustan.

Ahmad Shah was after the riches that were held in what is present day india, gold and ornaments , same as Mehmood Ghaznavi , there wasnt much in Pakistani Punjab that he was after as such other than strategic positioning of forces , thats why he did four invasions of what is present day india and plundered Delhi, Agra, Mathura, and Vrndavana.
 
.
Try to be more logical next time. Indians do not consider foreign invaders, particularly those who were into raping and massacering locals our heroes. That disctinction goes to Pakistanis. Even Indian Christians do not consifer British invaders and imperialists heroes, and indian christians also do not claim they ruled us because the british did.

Its sad that pakistani punjabis have to worship foreign invaders who looted, killed and raped them as their heroes. Its a fact. If they had any local muslim punjabi heroes to worship, they would not be reduced to naming their children taimur who was brutal on the people of today's pakistan.

So it's pakistani punjabis now and not Pakistanis, wow that was a quick turn around.

You guys still worship the those Central Asian invaders who conquered you gave you Hinduism and you still worship them and you have the audacity to point fingers at others.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom