HRK
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 14,108
- Reaction score
- 122
- Country
- Location
How many warheads Ababeel 1 can carry in max configuration.
supposedly three ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many warheads Ababeel 1 can carry in max configuration.
Yupp, you win .you can't beat me in my subject
He is mistaken again it was March 3B Rocket .....
Plz share this with him a more similar Bus & we are acknowledging it by placing our Flag & emblem of SUPARCO on it ....
View attachment 372057
Plz someone should ask him does he know the specification of the kuaizhou-1a which supposedly can carry only 200-300 KG payload .... on the other hand even S-II is capable of carring the 1000 Kg payload in unitary warhead configuration & He think a 3 MIRV payload will around 200- to 300 Kg .... ???
What an idiot .... he is ....
Bold part
My bad, should have started this discussion with you
The "Satellite Imagery Expert" of India has finally find out how we developed Ababeel
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...m-submarine-ispr.471649/page-68#ixzz4WsydntrcEdit: I don't know what kind of fits these morons will throw after we unveil the MIRVed system. Let me write before-hand some things that they will say:
1. Its just an SLV.
2. It just jettisons multiple warheads, they are not guided because pakis don't have any knowledge of independent trajectory insertions.
3. It looks so fragile, its not mobile.
4. The range is not enough for independent trajectory insertions.
5. China gifted it to Pakistan.
and so on.
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...m-submarine-ispr.471649/page-68#ixzz4Wsydntrc
So far 1,2,4,5 have been said. I feel like Nostradamus.
He is mistaken again it was March 3B Rocket .....
Plz share this with him a more similar Bus & we are acknowledging it by placing our Flag & emblem of SUPARCO on it ....
View attachment 372057
Plz someone should ask him does he know the specification of the kuaizhou-1a which supposedly can carry only 200-300 KG payload .... on the other hand even S-II is capable of carring the 1000 Kg payload in unitary warhead configuration & He think a 3 MIRV payload will around 200- to 300 Kg .... ???
What an idiot .... he is ....
MIRVs can be countered regardless of how they deployed, it's all about having plenty of layers and good numbers, with the AAD, PAD and S-400, MIRVs will be shot down.
No they are not, using lesser payload defies the purpose of the test in the first place.
MIRV can be dispensed in a linear pattern,nothing wrong here.So as per you there were three warheads.
Only this much area is marked as danger zone by NOTAM for three MIRV warheads? Confusing and defies the basic technicality of a MIRV warhead test.
View attachment 372110
This is K4 SLBM NOTAM issued for 31st Jan test. Not sure whether one warhead or multiple. Normally multiple warhead require minimum 2000 sq km area for 3 warheads. Because THEY DISPERCE!
View attachment 372119
MIRV can be dispensed in a linear pattern,nothing wrong here.
Hey little man, I already told you that you won. Do you need a prize or something?So as per you there were three warheads.
Only this much area is marked as danger zone by NOTAM for three MIRV warheads? Confusing and defies the basic technicality of a MIRV warhead test.
View attachment 372110
This is K4 SLBM NOTAM issued for 31st Jan test. Not sure whether one warhead or multiple. Normally multiple warhead require minimum 2000 sq km area for 3 warheads. Because THEY DISPERCE!
View attachment 372119
Hey little man, I already told you that you won. Do you need a prize or something?
BTW, 1st test = covers the basics = RVs jettisoned around the same target.
And nope, DRDO's NAVAREA warnings for BMs have always been like this...triangular. Be it A-4/A-5/K-4, all of which deliver unitary warhead.
that is your country prerogative. As I said, the rest of the world and your own government in policy does not view Mukti Bahini as a terror entity, and neither does it see Bangladesh as a Terrorist Country.Mukti Bahini were never declared as terrorists for two reasons
1. Their existence and violent struggle lasted from 25th March 1971 to 16th December 1971, a short period after which they came into power in an independent Bangladesh and ended their violent struggle. If Pakistan Army was fighting against them, they were of course considered hostile however after they into power, there was no point for Pakistan to declare it as a terrorist group so in order to do some damage control, Pakistani Govt. of that time accepted Bangladesh as a country.
Lashkar a taibba and JeM are formed of Pakistani nationals who are stuggling for rights of Indians in Kahsmir? Mukti Bahini was supported by India, but formed of Bangladeshis not indians, The chief of MB was not an Indian. These terrorist organisations that take pride in carnage in Mumbai, Dehi, Pune etc, are not struggling for anyone's rights. they are a cost effective mechanism of inflicting damage in India by Pakistani proxies.2. Usually, organizations who are struggling internally against a country for their rights are not declared as terrorist organizations by the UN, some examples from your own backyard are ULFA (which is put as a group of concern by UN but not as a terrorist group), CPI/PLGA, Khalitan Movement etc.
The fact remains that India helped Mukti Bahini by arming them and providing them with manpower, shelter and support and Modi admitted to that recently. He admitted that Indian Army soldiers fought side by side with Mukti Bahini, How different is that to Pakistan supporting LeT and JuD?
CEP after re-entry is close to zero? Please burn your engineering degree.Indian warheads have IRNSS in use and this means better performance and CEP close to zero this means are we testing MIRV?
Secondly, RV jettisoned around same target? So the Post boost Vehicle used cryogenics to stay stationary? or dropped all in one go?
1. KZ-1A has a max payload fairing diameter of 1.4m but Ababeel/Shaheen-II/III all have a base diameter of 1.4m, so Ababeel's fairing is much larger at 1.7-1.8m.
2. KZ-1A's payload capacity is 200kg to a 700km orbit, which is far far less than Ababeel's probable payload of 3xMIRVs touching ~600km apogee.
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...m-submarine-ispr.471649/page-68#ixzz4Wsydntrc
So far 1,2,4,5 have been claimed. I feel like Nostradamus.