Verily, you ought to refrain from commenting on topics you lack sufficient information on.
As said, the worst insults and death wishes were chanted against Iran's Supreme Leader by individuals who got away with it. They weren't arrested nor otherwise prosecuted. For such measures are essentially reserved for those resorting to violence and/or for ringleaders in the violent unrest.
The "BBC"... No comment.
Nice baseless rhetoric. Except that:
1) If the animosity between Iran and the USA regime amounted to a "false narrative", then Washington wouldn't have sanctioned Iran so massively in the first place.
2) The JCPOA was no grand bargain at all. In other terms, it was never supposed to lead to a normalization of ties between Islamic Iran and the USA regime. It's not uncommon for enemies to sit at the negotiating table to address very case-specific topics. The USSR and the USA negotiated and signed treaties on arms control, does this mean their mutual enmity was bogus? No it doesn't, and the exact same applies to Iran and the USA in the context of the JCPOA.
3) You wouldn't realize that the JCPOA was a result of the Islamic Republic's highly pluralistic and democratic nature, with the liberal faction getting into power during the presidency of Rohani and pushing for negotiations with Washington, as well as for large scale concessions to reach a deal. The revolutionary camp and the Supreme Leader never believed in the USA's sincerity, but had to respect Rohani's popular mandate all the while of foreseeing that Washington wouldn't respect their end of any deal, which in turn would delegitimize the policy of the liberals.
Negotiations after President Raisi's election were more of a formality, with Iran firmly insisting on her rights, requesting the inclusion of new verification mechanisms and guarantees that the USA regime would not tear up the deal again. While the Raisi cabinet announced that Iran will be able to do without a renewal of the JCPOA and that a plan B is in place in case Washington refused to accept Iran's legitimate conditions.
So as it appears quite clearly from the above, there's nothing "fake" about Islamic Iran's principled Resistance to American imperialism, JCPOA or no JCPOA.
Which cannot really be said of a country such as Spain, a classic vassal of Washington and Tel Aviv, deprived of independence and sovereignty. Reduced to mobilizing its diplomatic apparatus and dispatching military forces in support of the USA's illegal wars of aggression thousands of miles away.
en.wikipedia.org
Reduced furthermore to passing bills in order to offer Spanish citizenship to the descendants of Sephardic Jews in atonment of a "500 year old sin" (i.e. the expulsion of Jews from Spain consecutive to the Reconquista).
https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...ain-offers-citizenship-sephardic-jews/598258/
Whilst of course, the Native Americans subjected to genocide around the same period, or Andalusian Moslems expelled more than a hundred years later, will not be benefiting from this kind of Spanish generosity.
This is what's left of a former global power: a second-tier client regime of its former Anglo-Saxon rivals, a subject of zionist political overlordship. Spain can only dream of the independence enjoyed by Iran vis à vis the oppressive zio-American empire, let alone of mustering enough political will, bravery and prowess ever again to successfully stand up to the latter like the Islamic Republic has been doing for forty three years in a row.
www.namehnews.com
