A Muslim Mosque can be demolished, but not a Hindu temple: Modi's close aide Subramanian Swamy

[adil_minhas]

May be you need to ignore the stupidity around you, there is no cure for that. When you start believing that some particular act of someone is his / her habit, then you stop being annoyed by it. Similarly start believing that being stupid all the time is their habit ............ may be you will find some peace

I was doing that. Only words.

Till he made the fatal mistake of stepping out of the auto to give hool ...

Sometimes racials need to be shown their place.

 

[I.R.A]

I was doing that. Only words.

Till he made the fatal mistake of stepping out of the auto to give hool ...

Sometimes racials need to be shown their place.

Why even words? When you have fingers especially the middle one. Just make the gesture and keep moving

 

[adil_minhas]

Why even words? When you have fingers especially the middle one. Just make the gesture and keep moving

Bhai tu bada sophisticate hai.

Yahan ungli sirf ghusayi jaati hai.

Ya todi jaati hai.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

He is somehow right ... Mosque is just a building and can be demolish for greater good of people or any projects that could help people .. Mosque is not a temple where once someone place a idol than it can't be removed . but demolishing it for evil or provoking reasons is not good.

even though i don't like the guy

idol is just a stone too. can be broken. isn't it same is demolishing a mosque because it's a building.
by the way. if you stop Muslims from prayers by demolishing mosques then jihad becomes mandatory.

 

[DineshS]

idol is just a stone too. can be broken. isn't it same is demolishing a mosque because it's a building.
by the way. if you stop Muslims from prayers by demolishing mosques then jihad becomes mandatory.

A book is just pages, it can be torn and desecrated.
A religious figure is just a human, he can be caricatured..

See where I am going with YOUR logic?

 

[saurav jha]

In a real democracy "rights of a minority are protected"

No sir in real democracy everyone has equal rights. What you are saying is minority appeasement.

 

[danger007]

Saudi Arabia demolish mosques every other day to build roads, hotels, etc. so swamy has a valid point there.

of course it will be valid point unless you treat temple, masjid equally..

As usual, the context is being completely ignored.
This was comment made on why Temple can not moved and mosque can be. His logic is based on what lot of Islamic countries done all over the world where they destroyed mosques all the time.



Yeah...When Minority Kashmiri Hindus were being massacred, this logic was blissfully forgotten.
You reap whet you sow.

true minorities always under fire.. You cannot back up every stupid statement given by the politicians..

 

[SabzShaheen]

God is relevant in this legal matter as the case is about building a temple and/or mosque.

He is not making his own statement that mosque can be demolished but temple cannot be.

The statement is based on what each faith believes about their place of worship.

You can either counter it or modify Quran (or the Islamic position on mosques) to nullify his statement.

That's a good response; however, Muslims are not allowed to distort Islamic teachings.

 

[Sharpshooter12]

First he's actually sort of right about what he says about a mosque. Our faith places no special significance to a place of worship and one can be demolished if it is deemed in the people's interest. Of course Masjid al Haram, Masjid e Nabwi and Masjid e Aqsa have special place in our faith so that is a different story all together.

But Babar was just a conqueror and a mosque built by him holds no special significance what so ever.

But this is a mosque that was built 500 years ago, so has some historical value and naturally some sentimental value for the Muslims of India. Do people really want to destroy it because someone saw Ram gee in their dream calling it place of his birth. And it will only affect the communal harmony in India, Hindus(the extremist sorts) will take this as their victory while Muslims(of all sorts) will take it as a threat to their faith. So why bother.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

A book is just pages, it can be torn and desecrated.
A religious figure is just a human, he can be caricatured..

See where I am going with YOUR logic?

A man is just a piece of flesh and can be beheaded.
By the way you supported his mosque argument but your statement showed that you didn't wanted to apply same logic everywhere.

 

[StraightShooter]

Temples are not place for worship but business this MP must have got a 10 year deal of whatever chadhawa comes to Temple be Putin his pocket I respect everyone religion and it's worship place but which ever religion destroy other religions worship places I don't consider it religion

Historically, 1000s of Hindu temples have been destroyed by the invading Islamic armies. So by your argument Islam would not be considered a religion?

A man is just a piece of flesh and can be beheaded.

That's probably the thinking why Islamic state and other jihadists keep slitting the throats. You have a nice argument and they seem to have the same thinking as you.

First he's actually sort of right about what he says about a mosque. Our faith places no special significance to a place of worship and one can be demolished if it is deemed in the people's interest. Of course Masjid al Haram, Masjid e Nabwi and Masjid e Aqsa have special place in our faith so that is a different story all together.

But Babar was just a conqueror and a mosque built by him holds no special significance what so ever.

But this is a mosque that was built 500 years ago, so has some historical value and naturally some sentimental value for the Muslims of India. Do people really want to destroy it because someone saw Ram gee in their dream calling it place of his birth. And it will only affect the communal harmony in India, Hindus(the extremist sorts) will take this as their victory while Muslims(of all sorts) will take it as a threat to their faith. So why bother.

It has become a battle of egos between Muslims and Hindus.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

It has become a battle of egos between Muslims and Hindus.

But ain't it an indian logic applied to another application. Like newton laws can be used in many places.

 

[Upagrah]

Historically, 1000s of Hindu temples have been destroyed by the invading Islamic armies. So by your argument Islam would not be considered a religion?

That's probably the thinking why Islamic state and other jihadists keep slitting the throats. You have a nice argument and they seem to have the same thinking as you.

You don't seem to understand.

THEY can demolish temple because god told them they can, WE can't do it, cuz we are pagans.

And if you question it, you can be beheaded.

It has become a battle of egos between Muslims and Hindus.

Nope, its and ego issue only for the muslism, for the Hindus its a matter of faith.

 

[salarsikander]

This will only increase more communal tension in the community than harmony.

The very secular fabric of diverse India is being tested

 

[StraightShooter]

That is what @StraightShooter
Well you may or may not agree but universe will never change with new scientific discoveries, its just that science enabled man to understand existence of something that has been there forever. With passage of time human mind has evolved.

Of course universe will not change and Humans keep discovering but the question is would the religions change their position when new discoveries prove the religious positions as incorrect? That is crux of the matter. Why was Galileo convicted for publishing his scientific discoveries?

Religion would always justify and defend its position even if it is not justifiable as the people following it are following based on pure faith not based on logic and science.

That's a good response; however, Muslims are not allowed to distort Islamic teachings.

And Swamy very well knows that. Swamy does his home work very well and has won some very high profile cases.