A Message from Iran

[raptor22]

A Message from Iran

For more info:

The JCPoA : "The sword of Damocles" a western powers' dream

 

[Metanoia]

The guy is right. Also, the USA has a history of not honouring their agreements with other nations. They're proper thugs.

 

[-SINAN-]

I like Zarif.

 

[El Sidd]

Goodluck

 

[timmy_area51]

What was the message ? Well i mean youtube is censored in .. Iran .

 

[500]

A Message from Iran

For more info:

The JCPoA : "The sword of Damocles" a western powers' dream

1) Even Iranian members here admit that Zarif lied when he said that Iran never had a nuclear bomb program (same confirmed by IAEA).

2) When sanctions were removed in 2015, Khamenai regime used these billions not for its people, not for its economy but to increase slaughter in Syria.

 

[Tokhme khar]

Only you and your people consistently lie!

1) Even Iranian members here admit that Zarif lied when he said that Iran never had a nuclear bomb program (same confirmed by IAEA).

2) When sanctions were removed in 2015, Khamenai regime used these billions not for its people, not for its economy but to increase slaughter in Syria.

 

[500]

What was the message ? Well i mean youtube is censored in .. Iran .

Use VPN. Here good free ones:

https://windscribe.com/download
https://protonvpn.com/download

 

[raptor22]

1) Even Iranian members here admit that Zarif lied when he said that Iran never had a nuclear bomb program (same confirmed by IAEA).

2) When sanctions were removed in 2015, Khamenai regime used these billions not for its people, not for its economy but to increase slaughter in Syria.

Yeap Iran spending on military is huge in a way that we are not even amongst 15 countries:

While Iran military budget ain't more than 12 billions $ and surly a fraction of that would be spent in Iraq and Syria.
But again what would have happened If Iran had opted to stand idle to realty of reshaping the region through forming and creating terrorists by the US and its Arab allies it the region?
Iraq and Syria have been in the hands of terrorists the secession of Iraq had been already become a realty and consequently the entire region .... so wise spending now rather spending 10x later ...

And moreover at least Iran is in its own region, active in Iraq and Syria due to direst request of central Govs. of these countries ... what the American doing here?

Trump: $7 Trillion Spent in Middle East; Nothing to Show for It But ‘Death and Destruction’

Why the US regime used these billions $ not for its own people and instead seeking death and destruction in other regions, not for its economy but to increase slaughter and fight in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Lybia, Afghanistan in conflicts and wars it was involved directly in creating them and irony is it all happen not in its own region in far far away thousands kms away from its own territories which occupied after slaughtering its inhabitants?

Every indication is that Republicans will try to cut this critical program that serves over 46 million people a year.

You know it's almost half of Iran population that don't know are they gonna receive the next meal or not.

And on How Iran concealed everything from IAEA and how the US fabricated documents as it did in Iraq:

Certain facts are routinely omitted from all reporting and commentary on Iran and its nuclear program. What follows is just a bit about what the media either doesn't know or won't tell you about Iran's activities prior to 2003.​

The false narrative that Iran had a "robust," "clandestine" & "active" nuclear weapons program prior to 2003 relies on the assumption that Iranian black market purchases of dual-use nuclear equipment (all nuclear tech is dual-use, folks) reveals a "secret" program to build bombs.

This willfully omits the fact that, since the early 1980s, the Iranian government sought international partnership and trade for its nascent nuclear energy program, only to be deliberately denied access to nuclear tech by the US (a violation itself of the NPT).

In 1982, Iranian state media reported that, following the "discovery of uranium resources," "Iran was taking concrete measures for importing nuclear technology, while at the same time utilizing Iranian expertise in the field.​

In 1983, Iran's Atomic Energy Organization invited the IAEA to visit its nuclear sites in Esfahan and Tehran and requested assistance from the IAEA in resuming its research in domestic uranium enrichment and possibly setting up a pilot enrichment plant.

As soon as the U.S. government got wind of such potential cooperation, it "directly intervened," demanding the IAEA cease all assistance to Iran. "We stopped that in its tracks," said a former U.S. official years later.

Following American obstruction, "the IAEA dropped plans to help Iran on fuel production and uranium conversion." Nevertheless, Iran pushed forward with its research, and in 1985 discovered even more uranium deposits near Yazd. This was no secret: the BBC even reported on it.​

By the early 1990s, the IAEA was appraised of Iran's progress, had visited Iran's uranium mines, finding - according to official IAEA statements - "no cause for concern."

In 2000, Iran declared to the IAEA that it was constructing a Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) near Esfahan, an industrial scale plant for converting yellowcake into UF6 feedstock, nuclear material to be fed into centrifuges for further enrichment.

The size of the facility, its open declaration to the IAEA and subsequent safeguards and inspections, dispelled all possibility of use in a clandestine weapons program. Furthermore, that Iran would also build an enrichment plant of similar scale is obvious. Why else have an UCF?

While much is often made of the 2002 revelation of Iran's supposedly clandestine enrichment plant at Natanz, rarely do we hear that the pilot facility was still under construction when it was declared by Iran to the IAEA.​

Per Iran's safeguards agreement with the IAEA at the time, Iran was under no obligation to declare it was building a pilot plant until 180 days before it expected to introduce nuclear material into the plant.

In a 2004 interview with the Financial Times, Iran's IAEA representative scoffed at the notion that Natanz was ever intended to operate secretly. Here's what he said:​

Following an official declaration of the Natanz plant to the IAEA, Iran also publicly announced in February 2003 that it would begin domestically mining uranium at Saghand for an indigenous enrichment program.

In response, here's what IAEA spokesperson Melissa Fleming told the press: "This comes as no surprise to us, as we have been aware of this uranium exploration project for several years now. In fact, a senior IAEA official visited this mine in 1992."

Natanz was not operational until June 2006, at which point it had already been under IAEA safeguards for over three years. Hardly the lynchpin of a clandestine weapons program.​

Beyond all this, the media never - EVER - mentions the 2007 Work Plan, established between Iran & the IAEA, which defined the way to "clarify the outstanding issues" in relation to Iran's nuclear program. (That means the accusations made by the US & Israel.)

With regard to plan, then IAEA chief Mohammad ElBaradei pointed out that although "these outstanding issues are the ones that have led to the lack of confidence, the crisis... We have not come to see any undeclared activities or weaponization of their programme."

This conclusion was reached after two years of Iran's voluntary implementation of the IAEA's Additional Protocol, including a complete suspension of its enrichment program, which allowed intrusive and unfettered access to Iranian facilities for its inspectors.​

Despite the constant allegations of nuclear weapons work, the IAEA confirmed that "there is no evidence that the previously undeclared nuclear material and activities... were related to a nuclear weapons programme."

The Work Plan - which found in Iran's favor for each issue - was supposed to be the final nail in the coffin for allegations about secret weapons work. But the IAEA moved the goal posts.

Much of the supposed "evidence" of "alleged studies" into weapons (also known as "possible military dimensions" or PMD) is thought to have come from Israel itself - and has long been considered dubious by the IAEA itself.​

Nevertheless, through it all, the IAEA has consistently affirmed that there exists "no credible indications of the diversion of nuclear material in connection with the possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme."

Netanyahu's silliness is just the latest in a four-decade-long farce designed to punish and isolate Iran for daring to overthrow a US-backed dictator, deny it energy sustainability and economic security, and lay the groundwork for regime change.​

Nima Shirazi


Iran has shared all needed information by IAEA since the beginning of its program, when exacly are you gonna do the same exposure? and since you're not a signatory of NPT you ain't in a position to criticize a member of NPT.

 

[500]

Yeap Iran spending on military is huge in a way that we are not even amongst 15 countries:

Iran's doctrine is PROXY war. Out of swarms Iranian funded thugs fighting in Syria only few hundreds are Iranian military. There are Fatiminyun (Afghan mercenaries), Zaynabiun (Pakistani mercenaries), Hezbollahb (Lebanese mercenaries), dozens of Iraqi sectarian militias. Plus Iran is funding Assad regime, which os completely bankrupt. Assad needs billions of dollars yeach year to survive since his economy is completely destroyed.

 

[raptor22]

Iran's doctrine is PROXY war. Out of swarms Iranian funded thugs fighting in Syria only few hundreds are Iranian military. There are Fatiminyun (Afghan mercenaries), Zaynabiun (Pakistani mercenaries), Hezbollahb (Lebanese mercenaries), dozens of Iraqi sectarian militias. Plus Iran is funding Assad regime, which os completely bankrupt. Assad needs billions of dollars yeach year to survive since his economy is completely destroyed.

As it seems someone plans in Syria failed miserably and now is angry.
Yes as Iran stated it clearly several times our presence in Syria and Iraq is limited to military advisers due to direct request of central government of these countries and anyone who is willing to fight terrorism and extremists created by the US and allies could join the campaign and welcomed and it's obvious without permission of these government (except foreign invaders, the American an extremists supported by the US allies) no one has entered into these countries or violated their airspace as you do in Lebanon and Syria.

Netanyahu Claims 'Iran Lied' About Its Nuclear Program, but Israel Has Been Lying for Decades

 

[AmirPatriot]

It was important for Zarif to do send clear, official message. Europeans will take notice.

 

[sammuel]

What was the message ? Well i mean youtube is censored in .. Iran .

i thought many Iranian by now learned how to pass some of the mullah restriction

 

[Ceylal]

1) Even Iranian members here admit that Zarif lied when he said that Iran never had a nuclear bomb program (same confirmed by IAEA).

2) When sanctions were removed in 2015, Khamenai regime used these billions not for its people, not for its economy but to increase slaughter in Syria.

Why, for once in your lifetime talk to us about the Israeli nuclear program? And why Israel is entitled to it and not Iran..
Israel as a state, itself is pushed on lie and you are in the Middle East where everything is a lie, save the Persian...why Iran’s presumed lie bothers you?

 

[Rukarl]

Yeap Iran spending on military is huge in a way that we are not even amongst 15 countries:

View attachment 471646

While Iran military budget ain't more than 12 billions $ and surly a fraction of that would be spent in Iraq and Syria.
But again what would have happened If Iran had opted to stand idle to realty of reshaping the region through forming and creating terrorists by the US and its Arab allies it the region?
Iraq and Syria have been in the hands of terrorists the secession of Iraq had been already become a realty and consequently the entire region .... so wise spending now rather spending 10x later ...

And moreover at least Iran is in its own region, active in Iraq and Syria due to direst request of central Govs. of these countries ... what the American doing here?

Trump: $7 Trillion Spent in Middle East; Nothing to Show for It But ‘Death and Destruction’

Why the US regime used these billions $ not for its own people and instead seeking death and destruction in other regions, not for its economy but to increase slaughter and fight in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Lybia, Afghanistan in conflicts and wars it was involved directly in creating them and irony is it all happen not in its own region in far far away thousands kms away from its own territories which occupied after slaughtering its inhabitants?

Every indication is that Republicans will try to cut this critical program that serves over 46 million people a year.

You know it's almost half of Iran population that don't know are they gonna receive the next meal or not.

And on How Iran concealed everything from IAEA and how the US fabricated documents as it did in Iraq:

Certain facts are routinely omitted from all reporting and commentary on Iran and its nuclear program. What follows is just a bit about what the media either doesn't know or won't tell you about Iran's activities prior to 2003.​

The false narrative that Iran had a "robust," "clandestine" & "active" nuclear weapons program prior to 2003 relies on the assumption that Iranian black market purchases of dual-use nuclear equipment (all nuclear tech is dual-use, folks) reveals a "secret" program to build bombs.

This willfully omits the fact that, since the early 1980s, the Iranian government sought international partnership and trade for its nascent nuclear energy program, only to be deliberately denied access to nuclear tech by the US (a violation itself of the NPT).

In 1982, Iranian state media reported that, following the "discovery of uranium resources," "Iran was taking concrete measures for importing nuclear technology, while at the same time utilizing Iranian expertise in the field.​

In 1983, Iran's Atomic Energy Organization invited the IAEA to visit its nuclear sites in Esfahan and Tehran and requested assistance from the IAEA in resuming its research in domestic uranium enrichment and possibly setting up a pilot enrichment plant.

As soon as the U.S. government got wind of such potential cooperation, it "directly intervened," demanding the IAEA cease all assistance to Iran. "We stopped that in its tracks," said a former U.S. official years later.

Following American obstruction, "the IAEA dropped plans to help Iran on fuel production and uranium conversion." Nevertheless, Iran pushed forward with its research, and in 1985 discovered even more uranium deposits near Yazd. This was no secret: the BBC even reported on it.​

By the early 1990s, the IAEA was appraised of Iran's progress, had visited Iran's uranium mines, finding - according to official IAEA statements - "no cause for concern."

In 2000, Iran declared to the IAEA that it was constructing a Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) near Esfahan, an industrial scale plant for converting yellowcake into UF6 feedstock, nuclear material to be fed into centrifuges for further enrichment.

The size of the facility, its open declaration to the IAEA and subsequent safeguards and inspections, dispelled all possibility of use in a clandestine weapons program. Furthermore, that Iran would also build an enrichment plant of similar scale is obvious. Why else have an UCF?

While much is often made of the 2002 revelation of Iran's supposedly clandestine enrichment plant at Natanz, rarely do we hear that the pilot facility was still under construction when it was declared by Iran to the IAEA.​

Per Iran's safeguards agreement with the IAEA at the time, Iran was under no obligation to declare it was building a pilot plant until 180 days before it expected to introduce nuclear material into the plant.

In a 2004 interview with the Financial Times, Iran's IAEA representative scoffed at the notion that Natanz was ever intended to operate secretly. Here's what he said:​

View attachment 471648

Following an official declaration of the Natanz plant to the IAEA, Iran also publicly announced in February 2003 that it would begin domestically mining uranium at Saghand for an indigenous enrichment program.

In response, here's what IAEA spokesperson Melissa Fleming told the press: "This comes as no surprise to us, as we have been aware of this uranium exploration project for several years now. In fact, a senior IAEA official visited this mine in 1992."

Natanz was not operational until June 2006, at which point it had already been under IAEA safeguards for over three years. Hardly the lynchpin of a clandestine weapons program.​

Beyond all this, the media never - EVER - mentions the 2007 Work Plan, established between Iran & the IAEA, which defined the way to "clarify the outstanding issues" in relation to Iran's nuclear program. (That means the accusations made by the US & Israel.)

With regard to plan, then IAEA chief Mohammad ElBaradei pointed out that although "these outstanding issues are the ones that have led to the lack of confidence, the crisis... We have not come to see any undeclared activities or weaponization of their programme."

This conclusion was reached after two years of Iran's voluntary implementation of the IAEA's Additional Protocol, including a complete suspension of its enrichment program, which allowed intrusive and unfettered access to Iranian facilities for its inspectors.​

Despite the constant allegations of nuclear weapons work, the IAEA confirmed that "there is no evidence that the previously undeclared nuclear material and activities... were related to a nuclear weapons programme."

The Work Plan - which found in Iran's favor for each issue - was supposed to be the final nail in the coffin for allegations about secret weapons work. But the IAEA moved the goal posts.

Much of the supposed "evidence" of "alleged studies" into weapons (also known as "possible military dimensions" or PMD) is thought to have come from Israel itself - and has long been considered dubious by the IAEA itself.​

Nevertheless, through it all, the IAEA has consistently affirmed that there exists "no credible indications of the diversion of nuclear material in connection with the possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme."

Netanyahu's silliness is just the latest in a four-decade-long farce designed to punish and isolate Iran for daring to overthrow a US-backed dictator, deny it energy sustainability and economic security, and lay the groundwork for regime change.​

Nima Shirazi


Iran has shared all needed information by IAEA since the beginning of its program, when exacly are you gonna do the same exposure? and since you're not a signatory of NPT you ain't in a position to criticize a member of NPT.

Wish you spent more on the military, making the military stronger,bigger. But your mullahs and their families steal all of it.

Dont be proud, you are full of ashghal. It is a matter of time before the Iranians kick you out.