Iran does not even officially recognize the Khojaly massacre. Not to mention the horrific massacres of Russian-backed Armenian gangs in Iran at the beginning of the 20th century...
Then our Iranian friends here shamelessly talk about the first Karabakh war.
What do you mean by "not officially recognizing"? If you're suggesting the Iranian government has even remotely denied these events, then that will be incorrect: the Islamic Republic never issued any such statement.
On the contrary, we have concrete declarations by Iranian officials sharing the grief of Azarbaijanis in relation to these killings.
Iran shares Azerbaijan’s grief on Khojaly massacre
28 November 2013 12:32 (UTC+04:00)
By Sara Rajabova
Iranian Ambassador to Azerbaijan said Iran shares the grief of Azerbaijani people regarding the Khojaly tragedy.
The Khojaly tragedy refers to the massacre committed by Armenian armed forces against Azerbaijani civilians during the 1990s war.
Asked whether Iran condemns Armenia for the massacre of Azerbaijani civilians in Khojaly, Mohsun Pakayin said his country condemns all acts of terror perpetrated by states or individuals.
Iranian Ambassador to Azerbaijan said Iran shares the grief of Azerbaijani people regarding the Khojaly tragedy.
www.azernews.az
If you mean to say Iran is not organizing state-funded commemoration events for these occurrences, what government does for crimes committed outside its borders?
More importantly, Iran hasn't even staged significant public ceremonies to commemorate the genocide of her people at the hands of the British empire during World War I, when some 10 out of 20 million Iranians were massacred in horrible ways after London provoked a vast famine across the country. And you expect Iranian authorities to fund bigger events for a smaller scale massacre which took place during the same period?
I can't say this for all Iranians, but in the PDF, most Iranians see Azerbaijanis as enemies, it is unbelievable.
Correction: we only consider the Aliyev regime in Baku to be hostile towards Iran. Which is true, considering how it has been harboring agents of the zionist regime and allowing them to conduct sabotage, assassination and other activities against Iran from Azarabaijani soil, and seeing how it is tolerating pan-Turkist activists laying claim on sovereign Iranian lands.
The people of Azarbaijan however we consider our own Iranian kin, separated from their motherland through force as they were by the Tsarist Russian empire merely 110 years ago as a result of the treaty of Golestan.
It is important to operate the necessary distinction here.
Azerbaijan does not threaten Iran, on the contrary Iran threatens Azerbaijan constantly.
See above. The mentioned mischief by the regime in Baku clearly constitutes an objective threat to Iran. No sane and responsible government would remain indifferent to that.
When it goes to war, it helps its enemy. Whenever Azerbaijan tries to defend its rights, Iranian media starts terrible disinformative campaigns and even military threats.
Iran never assisted Karabakh separatists.
Nor do Iranian media engage in disinformation here, they defend Iranian core interests against threats emanating from Baku.
As in the last example. A peace agreement was signed in 2020. The parties agreed on mutual terms and a peace agreement was signed. Now Armenia does not want to fulfill its obligations, but wants Azerbaijan to fulfill all obligations. And this is where the problem starts.
Iran has no problem whatsoever with the terms of the 2020 agreement. Iran can't be faulted for Armenia's deeds.
But for days, Iranians here have been threatening Azerbaijan with completely stupid arguments and completely erroneous statements.
You forget Aliyev regime threats to occupy parts of Armenia's Syunik province along Iran's border. This is something Iran rightly sees as contrasting with her interests.
Again there's a key distinction to make: Iran is not opposing the terms of the 2020 peace agreement. At the same time, Iran will not tolerate illegal land grabs by Baku - such land grabs are not part of the 2020 agreement at all.
Baku has the right to use whatever legal means at its disposal to make the Armenian side comply with the agreement. Invading and annexing internationally recognized Armenian territory in Syunik however, as Baku has threatened with, would not represent an appropriate response. It would set a dangerous precedence of forceful border modification in the region and moreover it would go against basic Iranian interests, seeing how Iran's entire border with the southern Caucasus would fall under the control of a regime that collaborates with the zionists against Iran's national security.
This is really a rational, legitimate and simple stance by Iran. There's frankly nothing stupid about it.
Also you're leaving out the fact that it was Turkish forum users who first came to the Iranian section en masse, opening provocative threads, insulting Iranians with sectarianist expletives and trolling to no end.
Today, the US-Armenia military exercises have ended and we call on the Iranian army to conduct military exercises with Armenia. Be open, be honest.
Iran has no interest in conducting such exercises. All she's asking in this affair, is for internationally recognized borders to remain intact. No more, no less.
Borders remain intact - we are good. Someone tries to force a change - Iran will intervene. Very uncomplicated, straightforward and rightful.