Multani
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2010
- Messages
- 2,431
- Reaction score
- 2
shan, I never used gandi language. it was a mistake talking to that racist
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does that mean? Did you mean to say Punjab is NOT equal to India? The equation then is Punjab!=India
Some references to support the same would be helpful. Besides, the Brahmins enjoyed the apex position in Hindu society. They had access to knowledge, and also power if they so chose. Why would they want to convert into a Religion which sent them to it's lower social strata? Unless they were forced to convert, I fail to see the reasoning here.
I was wiped out because Buddhists lost debate with Hindus.Secondly there is no much difference bw Hinduism and Buddhism.Thirldy Buddha didnt achieved anything significant,achieving enlightenment was a common thing in Hindus at that time.
I meant we are talking about Punjab brahmins here not Indian brahmins.
This thread is actually about the history of RajputsI meant we are talking about Punjab brahmins here not Indian brahmins.
I will counter all bs just wait a few hoursBuddhism itself came from Hinduism.Majority of the Pakistanis were Hindus you cant deny that.
You are being dishonest so lets leave it here.Your example cannot be equated to Pakistan and Indians but lets leave it here.
Punjab=India
They had influence in India not punjab, even before Islam.
But wasn't Qaid e Azam a Lohana Rajput?
Alright. Any reasons why Punjabi Brahmins aren't the same as Brahmins in the rest of India?
I will counter all bs just wait a few hours
@INDIC @Tshering22 What you have to say about this??That makes no sense. If Budhists lost debates then how come Tibet and Sri Lanka and Burma didnt become hindu? we are talking about physical attacks, on stupas.
The hindu mandir is stolen architecture from the Budhists.
Hindus killed millions of Budhists, and wiped out their population, assimilating others as time passed by. Budhism died in india
I was talking in the broader sense in overall Muslim rule while you were singling out Punjab especially. We are both right, during Muslim rule Brahmins dropped to bottom this remained the same in Punjab especially even when it went into Sikh rule.
I am pretty sure he was Gujrati who was born in Sindh though.
I think I might have to draw you a picture because you are completely missing what I am saying.
Pre Muslim arrival this was the social system-
1. Brahmin
2. Warrior class
3. Merchant class / traders
4. Unskilled worker class
5. Untouchables
During Muslim Turkic rule this was the standing
1. Muslim Turkics
2. Other Muslim ashrafs
3. Local Muslim converts
4. Non Muslim warriors
5. Non Muslim merchants/ traders
6. Non Muslim others which included the Brahmins who used to be on top
Naturally Brahmins dropped to the bottom because they would not be needed by Muslim rules for the jobs they were doing whereas warriors or merchants were still needed. Hence if you see a Brahmin converting to islam would actually move up in status although he/she would still be beneath the ruling class and other "ashrafs". Naturally this structure is a lot more complex even amongst Muslims themselves then I have drawn out but this was the gist of it if you cannot get the picture I cannot help you.
I was wiped out because Buddhists lost debate with Hindus.Secondly there is no much difference bw Hinduism and Buddhism.Thirldy Buddha didnt achieved anything significant,achieving enlightenment was a common thing in Hindus at that time.
I think I might have to draw you a picture because you are completely missing what I am saying.
Pre Muslim arrival this was the social system-
1. Brahmin
2. Warrior class
3. Merchant class / traders
4. Unskilled worker class
5. Untouchables
During Muslim Turkic rule this was the standing
1. Muslim Turkics
2. Other Muslim ashrafs
3. Local Muslim converts
4. Non Muslim warriors
5. Non Muslim merchants/ traders
6. Non Muslim others which included the Brahmins who used to be on top
Naturally Brahmins dropped to the bottom because they would not be needed by Muslim rules for the jobs they were doing whereas warriors or merchants were still needed. Hence if you see a Brahmin converting to islam would actually move up in status although he/she would still be beneath the ruling class and other "ashrafs". Naturally this structure is a lot more complex even amongst Muslims themselves then I have drawn out but this was the gist of it if you cannot get the picture I cannot help you.