Prometheus
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 4,942
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
911 was an inside job
thanks for raising curten
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
911 was an inside job
pdl3 one thing i want to ask of if you say the pressure of the building cause the windows to blow from key structural points it is wrong it is air circulated which allows air to come in and out it aint sealed
.... i mean the PEOPLE WHO WORKED THERE EVEN SAY THAT BEFORE 911 there was being work done on floors and there drilling and areas where off limits? i mean have you guy have you heads soo up the fake news ***** that there no return?
The demolition of the Washington DC Convention Center in 2004 involved preparations that went on for months. Massive crews were at work, placing explosives around ~500 columns and doing other preparation work. The crews and activity were highly noticeable to people in the area.[7]
The demolition of Kodak Park's Buildings 9 and 23 in Rochester, New York took months of preparation. Setting up the explosives involved cutting torches to slice through metal pipes and heavy equipment to drill holes in the forest of thick concrete support beams, and placing sticks of dynamite into the holes. When they go off, the explosions cause the buildings to implode, or collapse inward.
Good...At least we can establish that you admit there was an aircraft, and a cruise missile IS an aircraft, that deliberately crashed into each tower. Still...It make little sense to use something as sophisticated as a laser guide when the towers themselves provided ample electronic guidance, even for unsophisticated optical guidance. The towers' exterior are largely glass. Each rose over 400 meters above ground. What is the need to have precision laser guidance?Laser-Guided system might have been used in guiding the planes/cruise missiles whatever they were,,,
Problem here is that for a true 'controlled demolition' those window blasts occurred BEFORE the collapse. In the case of the WTC towers, the collapse front was already in progress, hence we see compressed air blowing out some windows.Here's a snap from video u posted,,, compared to WTCs puffs.
9/11 Truth: Explosions, Squibs, Puffs in WTC Collapse Footage - LiveVideo.com
Har...Those flashes look more like they came from glass window deformations than from an explosion.Wanna see the series of explosions going on in the center of buildings...1st video below also answers ur proposition that WTC fell to one side which wasn't characteristic of controlled-demolitions... (See how CBS r trying to cover flashes by putting blue title bars)
Wrong...You are assuming that the central columns were deliberately compromised. The 'how' of their structural failures can come from either a deliberately implanted explosive charge, or a large object collided with them. No one can deny that the central columns' structural integrity were compromised. The question is the 'how' and that is where you are misleading people. Once the aircraft severed enough of the group's columns, the collapse behavior would of course be similar to how a structure is deliberately compromised.all imploded buildings do that,,, just go & watch implosions again,,,
that's why we call it implosion as opposed to explosion coz they all buckle inwards... coz the central column is blown up 1st so that falling floors pull the sides of building inwards,,, thus bringing the building down onto its footprints,,,
ur "buckling" theory actually proves that WTCs were imploded.
So when the lights are out the building installed the explosive charges by itself...???Perhaps, residents of building did report that there were lots of repairs/power outages going on 4-6 weeks preceding 911... these were all cover-ups for those installments,,
You should laugh...But at your own ignorance and gullibility. In aviation, weight is a penalty. An aircraft is not a solid object but essentially a hollow one. The fuselage is a tube, not a rod. The wings are fuel cavities and liquid mass do not offer the same type of structural integrity as solid mass can. That is why we have buildings made of concrete, not of water tanks. So when the airliner's wings met the Pentagon's solid concrete sides, guess what...The wings will be sheared off.I guess I too underestimated the convincing power of Nat Geo's documentry where they bent much much thinner beam loaded on one side with heavy metal plates, over a well oxigenated unrelenting fire & where they crash a wing-less rocket shaped scale model of 757 to prove why pentagon didn't get any damage from wings... should I laugh or what!!!
& ppl don't forget tests were done by "independent professors" who looked like students "from more than a dozen universities" aka Perdue uni...
You are correct. Anyone who does so believe should be committed to a mental rehab. Instead, they should believe that those airliners were hijacked and piloted by educated men, fully comfortable with modern day's technological level and how to exploit weaknesses....let me make this point clear.... Anyone who believes that a group of tribals living in the mountains were the ones who crashed airliners into the twin towers of the WORLD's MOST POWERFUL country are the biggest Idiots.
First of all, before I post the "slap-in-the-face video evidence" to prove 9/11 was an well orchestrated inside Job, let me make this point clear.... Anyone who believes that a group of tribals living in the mountains were the ones who crashed airliners into the twin towers of the WORLD's MOST POWERFUL country are the biggest Idiots.
New Recruit
You are correct. Anyone who does so believe should be committed to a mental rehab. Instead, they should believe that those airliners were hijacked and piloted by educated men, fully comfortable with modern day's technological level and how to exploit weaknesses.