7 Questions to Pakistani Members : Article 370

[Chanakyaa]

Hello,

Im Making a Set of Questionnaire..
Kindly reply in point wise manner. I wish to understand your POV for Educational purposes.

1.1 What do you know about Article 370 ?

1.2 Do you know that Pakistan too has initiated steps to Convert its part of Kashmir into fifth Province ?

• https://www.dawn.com/news/1232018
• https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/headline/govt-set-to-convert-gilgit-baltistan-into-fifth-province/

Don't you think, Pakistan too is WRONG to add GB as its Province ?

2. Why do you care for Kashmir ?

A. Because we are with the "People" of Kashmir and Their Rights
B. Because Kashmir is a Muslim Majority and we Care for Islam and Muslims
C. Kashmir Belongs to Pakistan
D. Others( Please Explain )

3. If You chose 2.A :

If you are concerned with the Rights of Kashmiris, Why is the Situation somewhat similar to Indian Kashmir ?

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...inking-pro-freedom-space-190304091423290.html

Your Views Please.

3. If You chose 2.B :

If you really care about a Muslim Majority, And you care about Palestine as well, why Not Uigher Muslims ?

An Article written by a Pakistani on 14th August 2019 > https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/why-...hinas-repressed-uighurs.631248/#post-11700464

3. C. If you choose 3.C , Then dont you think India has a better claim as the "Instrument of accession" is with India ?

4. Many in the forum are claiming that despite Russia, US and France taking a stand against Pakk+China , Its a victory coz, Kashmir issue was "Internationalised" .. Your Thoughts ?

Dont you think, that Year after year...Each Speech in UNGA has the mention of Kashmir .. was it still not Internationalized ? Kargil happened in 1999 the reason was Kahsmir.. Still it was not Internationalized ?

5. Article 370, was a line in Indian Constitution SINCE 1950. The Line was DELETED as per the Laws Given in Article 370 ITSELF.

How is a change of "Indian constitution" Illegal or for that matter, Not an Internal matter of India ?

6. After the UNSC meeting :

- India stays in Kashmir, the way it wants
- Pakstani cannot start a war due to Financial condition

Do you still think there is any chance for Pakistan , given the fact that UNSC too favored "bilateral" route ( which means > Solve between yourself.. we wont intervene ) ?

7. LOC is the Border Now, Pakistan keeps its part of AJK, India now keeps Its part of Kashmir.

Dont you think , we can administer our respective areas of Kashmir.. focus more on economy and development and stay away from this unnecessary conflict ?

 

[Asimzranger]

First ask your government to lift curfew then ask these questions.

 

[hussain0216]

Let's make this simple

Because we hate Indians and want partition from India

It's that simple!

But for some dumbfcuk reason you Indians want to force a Muslim majority state that hates you and wanted partition into a union full of Hindus creating decade's or turmoil at the same time your turning increasingly hindutva extremist

 

[Kabira]

Im not bothered about Indian making UT out of IoK. In fact it should be divided in 3 regions with muslim majority areas aka valley as separate. And then try to reach settlement with locals.

GB being 5th province is demand of locals though this idea is still on paper.

What India have done is start of ethnic cleansing and to change demographics systematically. Genocide is on cards but this is what these nazi like hindus want anyway.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

The simple, perfect and most watertight riposte is that you should do WHAT THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY IN QUESTION ACTUALLY WANT.

AZAD KASHMIRIS ARE HAPPY WITH AND ARE PART OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESSES REGARDING THEIR POLITICAL STATUS WITHIN PAKISTAN.

MEANWHILE, HINDUSTAN HAS TO DEPLOY A MILLION SOLDIERS TO ENFORCE ITS FRAUDS.

Stop trying to act like your intellectual zionist uncles with your attempts at a semi-logical argument. Just do what you gotta do, violently, forcibly, and be proud of it. We will respond, it is not a question of "if" any more.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

Give back our Jammu Hindus!!

The killing fields of Jammu: How Muslims become a minority in the region
Official records have tried their utmost to suppress the details of a Muslim massacre.
Saeed Naqvi
Jul 10, 2016 · 08:30 am

Wikimedia Commons


What was the death toll in the killing fields of Jammu? There are no official figures, so one has to go by reports in the British press of that period. Horace Alexander’s article on 16 January 1948 in The Spectator is much quoted; he put the number killed at 200,000.

To quote a 10 August 1948 report published in The Times, London: “2,37,000 Muslims were systematically exterminated – unless they escaped to Pakistan along the border – by the forces of the Dogra State headed by the Maharaja in person and aided by Hindus and Sikhs. This happened in October 1947, five days before the Pathan invasion and nine days before the Maharaja’s accession to india.” Reportedly, as a result of the massacre/migration, Muslims who were a majority (61 per cent) in the Jammu region became a minority.

ADVERTISEMENT
Mountbatten was in control in Delhi and had news of the genocide of Muslims in Jammu filtered out of the media. Sadly, there has been precious little discussion in India about this horrible phase of history.
Maharaja Hari Singh’s involvement, with the support of the RSS, is evident from a letter Jawaharlal Nehru wrote to Vallabhbhai Patel on 17 April 1949 (quoted in Frontline magazine):

In this (intelligence) report, among other things, a reference was made to a growing Hindu agitation in Jammu province for what is called a zonal plebiscite. This idea is based on the belief that a plebiscite for the whole of Kashmir is bound to be lost and, therefore, let us save Jammu at least. You will perhaps remember that some proposal of this kind was put forward by the Maharaja some months back. it seems to me that this kind of propaganda is very harmful, indeed, for us. Whatever may happen in the future, I do not think Jammu province is running away from us. If we want Jammu province by itself and are prepared to make a present of the rest of the State to Pakistan, I have no doubt we could clinch the issue in a few days. The prize we are fighting for is the valley of Kashmir. [This is what Nehru had dug in his heels for. The consequences are for all to see to this day.]

This propaganda for a zonal plebiscite is going on in Jammu, in Delhi and elsewhere. It is carried on by what is known as the Jammu Praja Parishad. Our intelligence officer reported that this Praja Parishad is financed by the Maharaja. Further, that the large sums collected for the Dharmarth Fund, which are controlled by the Maharaja, are being spent in propaganda for him.


The lid on these massacres was lifted by Ved Bhasin and a few journalists of that time. But like the collective silence over the pogrom in Hyderabad, the holocaust in Jammu has been a story hidden from public view by the machinations of the very people who covertly allowed the massacres to take place. These included many in the national leadership of the Congress party at the time. The events of Hyderabad and Jammu and Kashmir reveal the emergence in New Delhi of an establishment which was indifferent to Indian Muslims.

Consider the testimony of journalist Ved Bhasin. Here I am again quoting from his paper presented at the Jammu University in 2003.

Communal tension was building up in Jammu soon after the announcement of the Mountbatten plan with the Hindu Sabha, RSS and the Muslim Conference trying to incite communal passions. Tension increased with a large number of Hindus and Sikhs migrating to the State from Punjab and NWFP and even from areas now under Pakistan’s control. Trouble was brewing in Poonch, where a popular non-communal agitation was launched after the Maharaja’s administration took over the erstwhile jagir under its direct control and imposed some taxes. The mishandling of this agitation and use of brutal force by the Maharaja’s administration inflamed the passions, turning this non-communal struggle into a communal strife.

The Maharaja’s administration had not only asked all Muslims to surrender their arms but also demobilised a large number of Muslim soldiers in the Dogra army and the Muslim police officers, whose loyalty it suspected. The Maharaja’s visit to Bhimber was followed by large-scale killings.

Bhasin reports the large-scale killing of Muslims in Udhampur district, particularly in Udhampur proper, Chenani, Ramnagar and Reasi areas. Even in Bhaderwah (about 150 kilometres from Udhampur), a number of Muslims were victims of communal marauders. According to Bhasin, the RSS played a key role in these killings, aided by armed Sikh refugees “who even paraded the Jammu streets with their naked swords”. Some of those who led the riots in Udhampur and Bhaderwah later joined the National Conference and some even served as ministers. There were reports of Muslims massacred in Chhamb, Deva Batala, Manawsar and other parts of Akhnoor, with several of them fleeing to the other side or moving to Jammu. In Kathua district too there was the large-scale killing of Muslims and reports of women being raped and abducted.

As for the attitude of the state, Bhasin alleges that instead of preventing these communal killings and fostering an atmosphere of peace, “the Maharaja’s administration helped and even armed the communal marauders”. He goes on to say that many Muslims living outside Muslim-dominated areas were brutally killed by the rioters who moved freely in vehicles with arms and ammunition even when the city was officially under curfew. “The curfew it appeared was meant only to check the movement of Muslims,” he says.
Terrible carnage took place later when the Muslims in Talab Khatikan area were asked to surrender.

They were shifted to the police lines at Jogi gate, where now Delhi Public School is situated. Instead of providing them security, the administration encouraged them to go to Pakistan for safety. The first batch of several thousands of these Muslims were loaded in about sixty lorries to take them to Sialkot. Unaware of what is going to happen to them these families boarded the buses. The vehicles were escorted by troops. But when they reached near Chattha on Jammu-Sialkot road, in the outskirts of the city, a large number of armed RSS men and Sikh refugees were positioned there.

They were pulled out of the vehicles and killed mercilessly with the soldiers either joining [in] or looking [on] as idle spectators. The news about the massacre was kept a closely guarded secret. next day another batch of these Muslim families were similarly boarded in the vehicles and met the same fate. [T]hose who somehow managed to escape the wrath of killers reached Sialkot to narrate their tale of woe…


The state administration denied it had any role in the massacres. It even feigned ignorance of any plans to change the demography of the Jammu region. But Bhasin differs:

Though polite, he warned me of dire consequences…he first warned me by saying that “I could have put you behind bars for your nefarious activities. But since you also happen to be a Khatri like me and are also related to me, i am simply giving you advice. It is not the time to form peace committees and work for peace but to defend Hindus and Sikhs from the Muslim communalists who are planning to kill them and destabilise the situation. We have already formed a Hindu Sikh Defence Committee. You and your colleagues better support it.” Then he added, “We are imparting armed training to Hindu and Sikh boys in Rehari area. You and your colleagues should better join such training.” When i sent a colleague to the training camp the next day he found that some RSS youths and others were being given training in the use of .303 rifles by soldiers.

Another incident that I recall is about Mr Mehr Chand Mahajan (the then prime minister) who told a delegation of Hindus who met him in the palace when he arrived in Jammu that now when the power is being transferred to the people they should demand parity. [One] of them associated with National Conference asked how can they demand parity when there is so much difference in population ratio. Pointing to the Ramnagarrakh below, where some bodies of Muslims were still lying he said “the population ratio too can change”.

Mahatma Gandhi did comment on the situation in Jammu on 25 December 1947 and his remarks have found mention in volume 90 of his Collected Works: “The Hindus and Sikhs of Jammu and those who had gone there from outside killed Muslims. The Maharaja of Kashmir is responsible for what is happening there…Muslim women have been dishonoured.”

Excerpted with permission from Being the Other: the Muslim in India, Saeed Naqvi, Aleph Book Company.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Give back our Jammu Hindus!!

The killing fields of Jammu: How Muslims become a minority in the region
Official records have tried their utmost to suppress the details of a Muslim massacre.
Saeed Naqvi
Jul 10, 2016 · 08:30 am

Wikimedia Commons


What was the death toll in the killing fields of Jammu? There are no official figures, so one has to go by reports in the British press of that period. Horace Alexander’s article on 16 January 1948 in The Spectator is much quoted; he put the number killed at 200,000.

To quote a 10 August 1948 report published in The Times, London: “2,37,000 Muslims were systematically exterminated – unless they escaped to Pakistan along the border – by the forces of the Dogra State headed by the Maharaja in person and aided by Hindus and Sikhs. This happened in October 1947, five days before the Pathan invasion and nine days before the Maharaja’s accession to india.” Reportedly, as a result of the massacre/migration, Muslims who were a majority (61 per cent) in the Jammu region became a minority.

ADVERTISEMENT
Mountbatten was in control in Delhi and had news of the genocide of Muslims in Jammu filtered out of the media. Sadly, there has been precious little discussion in India about this horrible phase of history.
Maharaja Hari Singh’s involvement, with the support of the RSS, is evident from a letter Jawaharlal Nehru wrote to Vallabhbhai Patel on 17 April 1949 (quoted in Frontline magazine):

In this (intelligence) report, among other things, a reference was made to a growing Hindu agitation in Jammu province for what is called a zonal plebiscite. This idea is based on the belief that a plebiscite for the whole of Kashmir is bound to be lost and, therefore, let us save Jammu at least. You will perhaps remember that some proposal of this kind was put forward by the Maharaja some months back. it seems to me that this kind of propaganda is very harmful, indeed, for us. Whatever may happen in the future, I do not think Jammu province is running away from us. If we want Jammu province by itself and are prepared to make a present of the rest of the State to Pakistan, I have no doubt we could clinch the issue in a few days. The prize we are fighting for is the valley of Kashmir. [This is what Nehru had dug in his heels for. The consequences are for all to see to this day.]

This propaganda for a zonal plebiscite is going on in Jammu, in Delhi and elsewhere. It is carried on by what is known as the Jammu Praja Parishad. Our intelligence officer reported that this Praja Parishad is financed by the Maharaja. Further, that the large sums collected for the Dharmarth Fund, which are controlled by the Maharaja, are being spent in propaganda for him.


The lid on these massacres was lifted by Ved Bhasin and a few journalists of that time. But like the collective silence over the pogrom in Hyderabad, the holocaust in Jammu has been a story hidden from public view by the machinations of the very people who covertly allowed the massacres to take place. These included many in the national leadership of the Congress party at the time. The events of Hyderabad and Jammu and Kashmir reveal the emergence in New Delhi of an establishment which was indifferent to Indian Muslims.

Consider the testimony of journalist Ved Bhasin. Here I am again quoting from his paper presented at the Jammu University in 2003.

Communal tension was building up in Jammu soon after the announcement of the Mountbatten plan with the Hindu Sabha, RSS and the Muslim Conference trying to incite communal passions. Tension increased with a large number of Hindus and Sikhs migrating to the State from Punjab and NWFP and even from areas now under Pakistan’s control. Trouble was brewing in Poonch, where a popular non-communal agitation was launched after the Maharaja’s administration took over the erstwhile jagir under its direct control and imposed some taxes. The mishandling of this agitation and use of brutal force by the Maharaja’s administration inflamed the passions, turning this non-communal struggle into a communal strife.

The Maharaja’s administration had not only asked all Muslims to surrender their arms but also demobilised a large number of Muslim soldiers in the Dogra army and the Muslim police officers, whose loyalty it suspected. The Maharaja’s visit to Bhimber was followed by large-scale killings.

Bhasin reports the large-scale killing of Muslims in Udhampur district, particularly in Udhampur proper, Chenani, Ramnagar and Reasi areas. Even in Bhaderwah (about 150 kilometres from Udhampur), a number of Muslims were victims of communal marauders. According to Bhasin, the RSS played a key role in these killings, aided by armed Sikh refugees “who even paraded the Jammu streets with their naked swords”. Some of those who led the riots in Udhampur and Bhaderwah later joined the National Conference and some even served as ministers. There were reports of Muslims massacred in Chhamb, Deva Batala, Manawsar and other parts of Akhnoor, with several of them fleeing to the other side or moving to Jammu. In Kathua district too there was the large-scale killing of Muslims and reports of women being raped and abducted.

As for the attitude of the state, Bhasin alleges that instead of preventing these communal killings and fostering an atmosphere of peace, “the Maharaja’s administration helped and even armed the communal marauders”. He goes on to say that many Muslims living outside Muslim-dominated areas were brutally killed by the rioters who moved freely in vehicles with arms and ammunition even when the city was officially under curfew. “The curfew it appeared was meant only to check the movement of Muslims,” he says.
Terrible carnage took place later when the Muslims in Talab Khatikan area were asked to surrender.

They were shifted to the police lines at Jogi gate, where now Delhi Public School is situated. Instead of providing them security, the administration encouraged them to go to Pakistan for safety. The first batch of several thousands of these Muslims were loaded in about sixty lorries to take them to Sialkot. Unaware of what is going to happen to them these families boarded the buses. The vehicles were escorted by troops. But when they reached near Chattha on Jammu-Sialkot road, in the outskirts of the city, a large number of armed RSS men and Sikh refugees were positioned there.

They were pulled out of the vehicles and killed mercilessly with the soldiers either joining [in] or looking [on] as idle spectators. The news about the massacre was kept a closely guarded secret. next day another batch of these Muslim families were similarly boarded in the vehicles and met the same fate. [T]hose who somehow managed to escape the wrath of killers reached Sialkot to narrate their tale of woe…


The state administration denied it had any role in the massacres. It even feigned ignorance of any plans to change the demography of the Jammu region. But Bhasin differs:

Though polite, he warned me of dire consequences…he first warned me by saying that “I could have put you behind bars for your nefarious activities. But since you also happen to be a Khatri like me and are also related to me, i am simply giving you advice. It is not the time to form peace committees and work for peace but to defend Hindus and Sikhs from the Muslim communalists who are planning to kill them and destabilise the situation. We have already formed a Hindu Sikh Defence Committee. You and your colleagues better support it.” Then he added, “We are imparting armed training to Hindu and Sikh boys in Rehari area. You and your colleagues should better join such training.” When i sent a colleague to the training camp the next day he found that some RSS youths and others were being given training in the use of .303 rifles by soldiers.

Another incident that I recall is about Mr Mehr Chand Mahajan (the then prime minister) who told a delegation of Hindus who met him in the palace when he arrived in Jammu that now when the power is being transferred to the people they should demand parity. [One] of them associated with National Conference asked how can they demand parity when there is so much difference in population ratio. Pointing to the Ramnagarrakh below, where some bodies of Muslims were still lying he said “the population ratio too can change”.

Mahatma Gandhi did comment on the situation in Jammu on 25 December 1947 and his remarks have found mention in volume 90 of his Collected Works: “The Hindus and Sikhs of Jammu and those who had gone there from outside killed Muslims. The Maharaja of Kashmir is responsible for what is happening there…Muslim women have been dishonoured.”

Excerpted with permission from Being the Other: the Muslim in India, Saeed Naqvi, Aleph Book Company.

Jammu genocide. Genocide by Hindus and Sikhs against Muslims.

 

[Chanakyaa]

Well, Why is no body interested to Read and reply. Fine. Mods can close this thread.
I got the "Answer" I needed.

 

[Ritual]

Hello,

Im Making a Set of Questionnaire..
Kindly reply in point wise manner. I wish to understand your POV for Educational purposes.

1.1 What do you know about Article 370 ?

1.2 Do you know that Pakistan too has initiated steps to Convert its part of Kashmir into fifth Province ?

• https://www.dawn.com/news/1232018
• https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/headline/govt-set-to-convert-gilgit-baltistan-into-fifth-province/

Don't you think, Pakistan too is WRONG to add GB as its Province ?

2. Why do you care for Kashmir ?

A. Because we are with the "People" of Kashmir and Their Rights
B. Because Kashmir is a Muslim Majority and we Care for Islam and Muslims
C. Kashmir Belongs to Pakistan
D. Others( Please Explain )

3. If You chose 2.A :

If you are concerned with the Rights of Kashmiris, Why is the Situation somewhat similar to Indian Kashmir ?

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...inking-pro-freedom-space-190304091423290.html

Your Views Please.

3. If You chose 2.B :

If you really care about a Muslim Majority, And you care about Palestine as well, why Not Uigher Muslims ?

An Article written by a Pakistani on 14th August 2019 > https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/why-...hinas-repressed-uighurs.631248/#post-11700464

3. C. If you choose 3.C , Then dont you think India has a better claim as the "Instrument of accession" is with India ?

4. Many in the forum are claiming that despite Russia, US and France taking a stand against Pakk+China , Its a victory coz, Kashmir issue was "Internationalised" .. Your Thoughts ?

Dont you think, that Year after year...Each Speech in UNGA has the mention of Kashmir .. was it still not Internationalized ? Kargil happened in 1999 the reason was Kahsmir.. Still it was not Internationalized ?

5. Article 370, was a line in Indian Constitution SINCE 1950. The Line was DELETED as per the Laws Given in Article 370 ITSELF.

How is a change of "Indian constitution" Illegal or for that matter, Not an Internal matter of India ?

6. After the UNSC meeting :

- India stays in Kashmir, the way it wants
- Pakstani cannot start a war due to Financial condition

Do you still think there is any chance for Pakistan , given the fact that UNSC too favored "bilateral" route ( which means > Solve between yourself.. we wont intervene ) ?

7. LOC is the Border Now, Pakistan keeps its part of AJK, India now keeps Its part of Kashmir.

Dont you think , we can administer our respective areas of Kashmir.. focus more on economy and development and stay away from this unnecessary conflict ?

The simple matter of fact is that their was a pledge to conduct a plebsicite in Kashmir. That is what the governments should be discussing, with the aid of the UN. But your state has even been criticised by the UN in the 60s for deliberately avoiding the discussion table.

As far as ‘administering the respective regions’ - your govt is constantly threatening to ‘take’ AJK. So Pak has every right to defend using any means its see fit

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Well, Why is no body interested to Read and reply. Fine. Mods can close this thread.
I got the "Answer" I needed.

Everyone has given you a befitting reply. If you are having problems with being able to see those replies, specsavers can help.

 

[Chanakyaa]

Everyone has given you a befitting reply. If you are having problems with being able to see those replies, specsavers can help.

lol. Grow up kid.
You dont write History in a Mathematics paper and call its a "befetting reply".

@MastanKhan @BATMAN @Alternatiiv I doubt PDF has any appetite for serious talks anymore

 

[MastanKhan]

lol. Grow up kid.
You dont write History in a Mathematics paper and call its a "befetting reply".

@MastanKhan @BATMAN @Alternatiiv I doubt PDF has any appetite for serious talks anymore

We are in a state of war now---.

 

[hussain0216]

If thats true. Whats this :

https://www.dawn.com/news/1232018

Why this OPPOSITION ?

What's the connection to Partition????

Partition was our right, our choice


It is India's greed which has created turmoil in South Asia

 

[Chanakyaa]

We are in a state of war now---.

We have been a "state" of war since 1947 ! Sir.
Whats New ?

 

[Lincoln]

Hello,

Im Making a Set of Questionnaire..
Kindly reply in point wise manner. I wish to understand your POV for Educational purposes.

1.1 What do you know about Article 370 ?

1.2 Do you know that Pakistan too has initiated steps to Convert its part of Kashmir into fifth Province ?

• https://www.dawn.com/news/1232018
• https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/headline/govt-set-to-convert-gilgit-baltistan-into-fifth-province/

Don't you think, Pakistan too is WRONG to add GB as its Province ?

2. Why do you care for Kashmir ?

A. Because we are with the "People" of Kashmir and Their Rights
B. Because Kashmir is a Muslim Majority and we Care for Islam and Muslims
C. Kashmir Belongs to Pakistan
D. Others( Please Explain )

3. If You chose 2.A :

If you are concerned with the Rights of Kashmiris, Why is the Situation somewhat similar to Indian Kashmir ?

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...inking-pro-freedom-space-190304091423290.html

Your Views Please.

3. If You chose 2.B :

If you really care about a Muslim Majority, And you care about Palestine as well, why Not Uigher Muslims ?

An Article written by a Pakistani on 14th August 2019 > https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/why-...hinas-repressed-uighurs.631248/#post-11700464

3. C. If you choose 3.C , Then dont you think India has a better claim as the "Instrument of accession" is with India ?

4. Many in the forum are claiming that despite Russia, US and France taking a stand against Pakk+China , Its a victory coz, Kashmir issue was "Internationalised" .. Your Thoughts ?

Dont you think, that Year after year...Each Speech in UNGA has the mention of Kashmir .. was it still not Internationalized ? Kargil happened in 1999 the reason was Kahsmir.. Still it was not Internationalized ?

5. Article 370, was a line in Indian Constitution SINCE 1950. The Line was DELETED as per the Laws Given in Article 370 ITSELF.

How is a change of "Indian constitution" Illegal or for that matter, Not an Internal matter of India ?

6. After the UNSC meeting :

- India stays in Kashmir, the way it wants
- Pakstani cannot start a war due to Financial condition

Do you still think there is any chance for Pakistan , given the fact that UNSC too favored "bilateral" route ( which means > Solve between yourself.. we wont intervene ) ?

7. LOC is the Border Now, Pakistan keeps its part of AJK, India now keeps Its part of Kashmir.

Dont you think , we can administer our respective areas of Kashmir.. focus more on economy and development and stay away from this unnecessary conflict ?

1.1 Enough to know its effect on Kashmir.

1.2 Yes, and yes.

2.0 A

3.0 Isolated incidents, over 95% of the population backs Pakistan.

4.0 Internationalization is still good. Kashmir didn't have this coverage before. And that can lead to "things," possibly. Look at Uighur issue as an example.

5.0 Not internal matter because it's concerning the autonomy of a disputed region. Removal of autonomy means annexation.

6.0 UNSC is keeping eye on it. India won't solve it diplomatically but at least we exhausted all diplomatic options. I don't know realistically what action is possible but war over it, now, is inevitable, maybe not today but tomorrow.

7.0 Yes, I agree but our politicians don't. Settling that requires talks. Till then for either side to prematurely express that politically is a defeat, and betrayal to people. So in talks, and consensus, it's easier.