What's new

655,000 Iraqis died due to war: study

Lahori paa jee

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
752
Reaction score
0
A controversial new study contends nearly 655,000 Iraqis have died because of the war, suggesting a far higher death toll than other estimates.

In the new study, researchers attempt to calculate how many more Iraqis have died since March 2003 than one would expect without the war.

Their conclusion, based on interviews of households and not a body count, is that about 600,000 died from violence, mostly gunfire. They also found a small increase in deaths from other causes like heart disease and cancer.

``Deaths are occurring in Iraq now at a rate more than three times that from before the invasion of March 2003,'' Dr. Gilbert Burnham, lead author of the study, said in a statement.

Source
 
Saddam Hussain is being tried for the murder of a few Kurds and a few Sunni's. Although a judgement has yet to be announced but he will surely be punished.

Regardless of how cruel he was, the country was not facing the tragedy they are going through. These thousands and thousands of dead innocent civilians were living happily. Iraqs infrastructure was intact and despite American and UN sanctions the country was progressing steadily but slowly.

This current bloodshed in Iraq and the civil war is a consequence of American invasion. All in the name of revenge. Bush wanted to achieve what is father could not.
 
An estimated 655,000 Iraqis have died since 2003 who might still be alive but for the US-led invasion, according to a survey by a US university. The research compares mortality rates before and after the invasion from 47 randomly chosen areas in Iraq.

The figure is considerably higher than estimates by official sources or the number of deaths reported in the media.

It is vigorously disputed by supporters of the war in Iraq, including US President George W Bush.

John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHBSPH) estimate that the mortality rates have more than doubled since the invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein, causing an average of 500 deaths a day.

I stand by the figure that a lot of innocent people have lost their life... and that troubles me, and it grieves me
President George W Bush
In the past, Mr Bush has put the civilian death toll in Iraq at 30,000, and hours after details of the latest research were published he dismissed JHBSPH's methodology as "pretty well discredited".
The John Hopkins researchers argue their statistical approach is more reliable than counting dead bodies, given the obstacles preventing more comprehensive fieldwork in the violent and insecure conditions of Iraq.

"I stand by the figure that a lot of innocent people have lost their life... and that troubles me, and it grieves me," Mr Bush told reporters at the White House.

"Six-hundred thousand or whatever they guessed at is just... it's not credible," Mr Bush said.

Sharp rise

The researchers spoke to nearly 1,850 families, comprising more than 12,800 people in dozens of 40-household clusters around the country.

Of the 629 deaths they recorded among these families since early 2002, 13% took place in the 14 months before the invasion and 87% in the 40 months afterwards.
Such a trend repeated nationwide would indicate a rise in annual death rates from 5.5 per 1,000 to 13.3 per 1,000 - meaning the deaths of some 2.5% of Iraq's 25 million citizens in the last three-and-a-half years.

The researchers say that in nearly 80% of the individual cases, family members produced death certificates to support their answers.

Reliable data is very hard to obtain in Iraq, where anti-US insurgents and sectarian death squads pose a grave danger to civilian researchers.

The survey updates earlier research using the same "cluster" technique which indicated that 100,000 Iraqis had died between the invasion and April 2004 - a figure that was also dismissed by many supporters of the US-led coalition.

'Survivor bias'

While critics point to the discrepancy between this and other independent surveys (such as Iraq Body Count's figure of 44-49,000 civilian deaths, based on media reports), the Bloomberg School team says its method may actually underestimate the true figure.

"Families, especially in households with combatants killed, could have hidden deaths. Under-reporting of infant deaths is a widespread concern in surveys of this type," the authors say.

"Entire households could have been killed, leading to survivor bias."

The survey suggests that most of the extra deaths - 601,000 - would have been the result of violence, mostly gunfire, and suggests that 31% could be attributable to action by US-led coalition forces.

The survey is to be published in a UK medical journal, the Lancet, on Thursday.

In an accompanying comment, the Lancet's Richard Horton acknowledges that the 2004 survey provoked controversy, but emphasises that the 2006 follow-up has been recommended by "four expert peers... with relatively minor revisions".

Source: BBC News, UK

Comment: This is the so called 'freedom' and 'democracy' of the West. In truth, Bush and Blair and all other 'coalition of the willing' countries are responsible for every single one of these deaths in Afghanistan, Lubnan and Iraq. If France wants to promote the so called 'genocide' of the Armenians, who then will highlight the genocide of Muslims from Chechnya to Kashmir, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lubnan and Iraq? How many more lives will it take before 'freedom, justice and democracy' transmogrify to become massacre, genocide and holocaust?
 
This is going to cost Bush a lot of votes in mid term elections, he's already denied the report as nonsense! :rolleyes:
 
Muslims try to bury their dead as soon as possible, many people wouldnt even take the body to the morgue. When trying to estimate the spread of an infectious deadly disease, this same method of taking cluster samples and extrapolation is used because trying to count the actual infected person is simply not possible due to cost, time and other constraints. Its quite interesting that Bush didnt attack or even address the underlying method of the study, he just rejected it out of hand. This wont cost any mid term election seats because the only death count that matters to U.S. voters is U.S. deaths in Iraq.
 
Western government have become more or less kind of like a Germany government in the early days of Hitler. This reminds me of a famous Hitlers quote.

Western citizens must wake up and realize the facts from fiction.

The [Nazi party] should not become a constable of public opinion, but must dominate it. It must not become a servant of the masses, but their master!
- Adolf Hitler
 
Most of them are victims to Muslims internal fued.
The shias killing Sunnis and vice -versa.
 
Most of them are victims to Muslims internal fued.
The shias killing Sunnis and vice -versa.

Most? I dont think that word fits in there.

What makes you think that Muslims need to worry about sects, when they can see an aggressive occupational force in front of them?

Also do you really believe that Shia Vs Sunni is really made the most casualties? I dont think its even about Shia VS Sunni in Iraq right now. This issue is probably the last issue of which Iraqi people will fight against each other. :coffee:
 
Back
Top Bottom