5 lakh for Muslim, 2 lakh for Christian family to switch to Hinduism: Dharm Jagran Manch details cos

[Iggy]

Mary in a saree has been around for a long time, but Mary carrying Ganesha? Surely that is not whom she birthed? Was she Shiva's wife too?

Thats what adapting Indian culture and I thought Parvathi created Ganesha by taking the turmeric paste from her body and breathing life into it not given birth to him.

 

[Indrani]

Thats what adapting Indian culture and I thought Parvathi created Ganesha by taking the turmeric paste from her body and breathing life into it not given birth to him.

That was Parvati, but Mary was not known to take bath with turmeric paste, she had another specialty. Hindus do not confuse their gods. So in the name of adapting Indian culture, plagarism is not going to be approved.

 

[Iggy]

That was Parvati, but Mary was not know to take bath with turmeric paste, she had another specialty. Hindus do not confuse their gods. So in the name of adapting Indian culture, plagarism is not going to be approved.

Okay... You guys do not want Ganesha's picture to be associated with Mary but want Devi Saraswati's pic in schools.. What a confused lot!!

 

[Indrani]

Okay... You guys do not want Ganesha's picture to be associated with Mary but want Devi Saraswati's pic in schools.. What a confused lot!!

Ganesha has nothing to do with Mary, but Saraswati has everything to do with Vidya, knowledge, education. Hence the association of Saraswati with Schools is right. Who is confused now?

 

[Iggy]

Ganesha has nothing to do with Mary, but Saraswati has everything to do with Vidya, knowledge, education. Hence the association of Saraswati with Schools is right. Who is confused now?

According to Hindu beliefs.. What it has to do with Christian schools?

 

[Indrani]

According to Hindu beliefs.. What it has to do with Christian schools?

A Christian school educating only Christians need not have Saraswati, but these Christian schools are educating Hindu kids, so Hindu icons have to be included.

 

[Iggy]

A Christian school educating only Christians will not be needed to have Saraswati, but these Christian schools are educating Hindu kids, so Hindu icons have to be included.

Does it owned by Hindu organisations?? Will any Hindu organisations owned school put picture of Mecca or a picture of Jesus because Christians and Muslims are learning here.. Do not post nonsense here..

 

[Indrani]

Does it owned by Hindu organisations?? Will any Hindu organisations owned school put picture of Mecca or a picture of Jesus because Christians and Muslims are learning here.. Do not post nonsense here..

Most of the money earned by these schools are from fees collected by Hindus only. When Muslims are in a position to dictate the school's funding then they too will dictate terms. Also all these schools are state funded partially and this state was established on the principles of Hindutva, so Saraswati will stay put in the schools.

 

[PlanetWarrior]

Most of the money earned by these schools are from fees collected by Hindus only. When Muslims are in a position to dictate the school's funding then they too will dictate terms. Also all these schools are state funded partially and this state was established on the principles of Hindutva, so Saraswati will stay put in the schools.

You are talking through your nose here. The highlighted statement reflects your ignorance. Where in the constitution of India does it mention that the Indian state was "founded on the principles of Hindutva" ? Pray tell me

 

[Iggy]

Most of the money earned by these schools are from fees collected by Hindus only. When Muslims are in a position to dictate the school's funding then they too will dictate terms. Also all these schools are state funded partially and this state was established on the principles of Hindutva, so Saraswati will stay put in the schools.

What kind of moronic statement is this? State is established on the principles of Hindutva??I now seriously think you are living in parallel universe.

 

[Indrani]

What kind of moronic statement is this? State is established on the principles of Hindutva??I now seriously think you are living in parallel universe.

Pictures of our Original Constitution of INDIA ,

Looks like or Founding fathers were the Original Hindutvadi.

This word "Secularism" was added in 1975, into indian Constitution by Indira Gandhi, under Emergency rule. During emergency, parliament was dismissed and whole power remained in two hands - PM(Indira) and President(Fakhruddin). Before inserting such Constitutional amendment, you need parliement debate and voting. She took neither of it & ordered Fakhruddin to sign an unilateral ordinance(a single person VETO).

This is why none of her opponent parties has accepted this claim of "secular india", which remains a farce. For those who are wondering what indian Constitution was originally in 1947, they should see this pic(photos of Ram,Sita & Laxman on 1st edition of indian Constitution.)

In Samvidhan Sabha debate, B.R.Ambedkar said - "Secularism has no relevance for India. It was invented for European religions. I refuse to insert this word in Constitution as its fit in our indian context & philosophies".

(read Supreme Court's decision on "Constitution" in 1994. It said - "Hindutva(same as Hinduness/core-principles) is nectar of indian Constitution").

Quoting from posts of @JaiShriAllahNath and Manvan.

 

[Iggy]

@Indrani can you show me a credible link showing this.. Not the link of hinduexistence.org

 

[Indrani]

@Indrani can you show me a credible link showing this.. Not the link of hinduexistence.org

That is the page from the Indian constitution. You can do an RTI and get the information yourself.

 

[Koovie]

And this ladies and gentlemen is the reason why we are a poor 3rd world country.

 

[Parul]

And this ladies and gentlemen is the reason why we are a poor 3rd world country.

This Secularism is responsible for where the country is.