What's new

3 militants killed in encounter

We made you our b!tch for 1 thousand years, remember these guys?


main-qimg-6c81243ad58c83535e6de3288225663d
c775f30452945b05e0c4bae8b4f3186c.jpg
220px-Aurangzeb_in_old_age_2.jpg
220px-Ahmad-Shah-Durani.jpg


17635533_1247315912047616_2854481876967418978_o.jpg


220px-%DA%86%D8%A7%DA%A9%D8%B1_%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86.jpg
images
220px-%22Hyder_Ali%2C%22_a_steel_engraving_from_the_1790%27s_%28with_modern_hand_coloring%29.jpg
220px-Tipu_Sultan_BL.jpg



We crippled you monkeys whilst being outnumbered, yet you only won in 1971 by outnumbering the Eastern command 13:1. You also still failed to defeat Western Pakistan and suffered higher casualties.

Look up Operation Gibraltar 1965 with IA personnels outside Lahore Police station. Hope it helps with crying bucket loads :cray::cray:
 
.
Look up Operation Gibraltar 1965 with IA personnels outside Lahore Police station. Hope it helps with crying bucket loads :cray::cray:

And you look up who actually won the 1965 war, it might sting a little.

They were all from Central Asia.. You need a Geography refresher badly !!

They were all Muslim, and that's all that matters. They didn't fight for their ethnicity, they fought in the name of Islam and considered themselves Muslims first and foremost.

Also, you're still wrong. Mahmud Ghaznavi and Muhammad Ghauri were born in Khorasan, which was a geographical area at the time that included most of Pakistan. Lahore was also the 2nd largest city that both these Sultans ruled over, and their military's and administration's each consisted of large numbers of people from Pakistan (mostly Pashtuns, Baluchis and Punjabis). Muhammad Ghauri was also a Pashtun (2nd largest ethnic group in Pakistan, in fact, Pakistan has the largest number of Pashtuns in the world).

Aurangzeb Alamgir was from the Indian sub-continent, a geographical area that includes large portions of Pakistan. He was also from the Indus plains, which includes all of Pakistan (as well as large portions of north-west Hindustan). Again, many people from Pakistan fought in his military and worked in his administration, and Lahore was one of his largest cities (he decorated it with numerous monuments, in fact, Lahore has more Mughal monuments than any city in Hindustan). He also spoke Urdu, ate Mughlai cuisine (as do modern day Pakistanis), wore Shalwar Kameez, etc. In fact, my fathers town (Sarai Alamgir) was founded by Aurangzeb Alamgir.

Ahmed Shah Durrani was another Pashtun who's army consisted of many Baluchis and Pashtuns from Pakistan, Peshawar was also one of his largest cities. His tribe (the Durranis) are also a major tribe in Pakistan, and Ahmed Shah Durrani himself was born in Multan.

Sikander Shah Mir was a Kashmiri Gujjar (however, his family did originally migrate from Swat valley) who ruled over all of the Kashmir region and some other nearby territories in northern Hindustan and Pakistan. He earned the title of "butshikan" because he used to destroy every Hindu idol he saw (perfectly justified because he was at war with them, and they would have done even worse things to him if they were able to).

Mir Chakar Rind was a Baluchi who ruled over southern Pakistan, and he once sent his military to go and sack Delhi.

Sikander Lodi was ethnically mixed, with a Pashtun father and a Punjabi mother. He ruled over eastern Pakistan and large portions of northern Hindustan.

Hyder Ali's father was Punjabi, and he overthrew the ruling dynasty of southern Hindustan, replacing it with a Muslim one that battered the British colonialists and the Maratha's simultaneously. His son Tipu Sultan succeeded him, continuing to fight bravely against both forces (unfortunately, he was less successful but he died fighting like a lion).

Also, Muslims across Hindustan and Pakistan have been proven to be descended from the Islamic invaders:

screenshot_2018-04-11-15-35-59-1-png.469512


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067368

"we observed a certain degree of genetic contribution from Iran to both Muslim populations"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3163234

"The study showed that the Muslim Gujjars differ significantly from their counterpart, the Hindu Gujjars"
 
.
And you look up who actually won the 1965 war, it might sting a little.



They were all Muslim, and that's all that matters. They didn't fight for their ethnicity, they fought in the name of Islam and considered themselves Muslims first and foremost.

Also, you're still wrong. Mahmud Ghaznavi and Muhammad Ghauri were born in Khorasan, which was a geographical area at the time that included most of Pakistan. Lahore was also the 2nd largest city that both these Sultans ruled over, and their military's and administration's each consisted of large numbers of people from Pakistan (mostly Pashtuns, Baluchis and Punjabis). Muhammad Ghauri was also a Pashtun (2nd largest ethnic group in Pakistan, in fact, Pakistan has the largest number of Pashtuns in the world).

Aurangzeb Alamgir was from the Indian sub-continent, a geographical area that includes large portions of Pakistan. He was also from the Indus plains, which includes all of Pakistan (as well as large portions of north-west Hindustan). Again, many people from Pakistan fought in his military and worked in his administration, and Lahore was one of his largest cities (he decorated it with numerous monuments, in fact, Lahore has more Mughal monuments than any city in Hindustan). He also spoke Urdu, ate Mughlai cuisine (as do modern day Pakistanis), wore Shalwar Kameez, etc. In fact, my fathers town (Sarai Alamgir) was founded by Aurangzeb Alamgir.

Ahmed Shah Durrani was another Pashtun who's army consisted of many Baluchis and Pashtuns from Pakistan, Peshawar was also one of his largest cities. His tribe (the Durranis) are also a major tribe in Pakistan, and Ahmed Shah Durrani himself was born in Multan.

Sikander Shah Mir was a Kashmiri Gujjar (however, his family did originally migrate from Swat valley) who ruled over all of the Kashmir region and some other nearby territories in northern Hindustan and Pakistan. He earned the title of "butshikan" because he used to destroy every Hindu idol he saw (perfectly justified because he was at war with them, and they would have done even worse things to him if they were able to).

Mir Chakar Rind was a Baluchi who ruled over southern Pakistan, and he once sent his military to go and sack Delhi.

Sikander Lodi was ethnically mixed, with a Pashtun father and a Punjabi mother. He ruled over eastern Pakistan and large portions of northern Hindustan.

Hyder Ali's father was Punjabi, and he overthrew the ruling dynasty of southern Hindustan, replacing it with a Muslim one that battered the British colonialists and the Maratha's simultaneously. His son Tipu Sultan succeeded him, continuing to fight bravely against both forces (unfortunately, he was less successful but he died fighting like a lion).

Also, Muslims across Hindustan and Pakistan have been proven to be descended from the Islamic invaders:

screenshot_2018-04-11-15-35-59-1-png.469512


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20067368

"we observed a certain degree of genetic contribution from Iran to both Muslim populations"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3163234

"The study showed that the Muslim Gujjars differ significantly from their counterpart, the Hindu Gujjars"

Posting all that hot garbage doesn't change the reality. Look where India is now and where Pakistan is in terms of GDP.
 
.
Posting all that hot garbage doesn't change the reality. Look where India is now and where Pakistan is in terms of GDP.

It's funny how you have no counter arguments, so all you can do is call it "garbage".

Irrelevant, you are far larger than us so obviously your GDP will be greater. What matters is per capita, and you aren't that far ahead in that area. In fact, for most of our history since 1947, Pakistan has had a higher GDP per capita than Hindustan (it was only in 2004 Hindustan overtook Pakistan, but even now the gap is minimal). With CPEC coming in full swing and other economic developments in Pakistan, our GDP per capita will inshallah surpass yours again.

Also, at the moment you still have a hell of a lot of problems that are far worse than anything we have, for example:

https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-05...emains-huge-problem-worst-all-women-and-girls

"Some 70 percent of households in India don’t have access to toilets"

 
.
It's funny how you have no counter arguments, so all you can do is call it "garbage".

Irrelevant, you are far larger than us so obviously your GDP will be greater. What matters is per capita, and you aren't that far ahead in that area. In fact, for most of our history since 1947, Pakistan has had a higher GDP per capita than Hindustan (it was only in 2004 Hindustan overtook Pakistan, but even now the gap is minimal). With CPEC coming in full swing and other economic developments in Pakistan, our GDP per capita will inshallah surpass yours again.

Also, at the moment you still have a hell of a lot of problems that are far worse than anything we have, for example:

https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-05...emains-huge-problem-worst-all-women-and-girls

"Some 70 percent of households in India don’t have access to toilets"
Posted the genetic map again ??
Boy ! Are you serious
 
.
Back
Top Bottom