TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Strangely you pick a valid point. What the heck are LeT doing in BD if they are supposed to fight for state injustice against muslims (as pointed by EastWatch in one thread)?..Aint this guys only supposed to be fighting in Kafir countries like India or say US of A.
Even more strangely you answer your own question
"A Muslim can fight on behalf of other Muslim to get their right as LeT is doing for the Kashmiries."
Boundaries are immaterial for this idiot's. They foresee one law governing this countries. Sharia. And to achieve this, they will fight in any country to establish such. Any country... Any Islamic cause. That my friend is difficult for some member's here to accept.
yap they should have confined their fight in Kashmir only (i suppose they are kashmir separatist group). In 1971 not a single Mukti gone to West Pakistan and fired a singl bullet. Even Shanti Bahini in Chittagong never got out of their own teritorry as well as ULFA fighting in India did not take the fight outside Assam. Rules of engagement must be maintained if you fight for a cause. Those who were like Al-Qaeda, LET, PLO, Srilankan tigers who did not follow the rules of engagement finally lost public support and eventually lost the war.
I am not promoting anything here just an observation that I liked to share.