27/2 PAF Strikes in IoK- India's Other Major Losses on the ground l DG ISPR confirms.

[Reichsmarschall]

actually believes his own creations of fantasy

perhaps he is inspired by 1.3 billion brain dead zombies living across the red cliff line

 

[alee92nawaz]

When the Indian PM openly said that ''If India had Rafales, we wouldn't have suffered so much damage'', it was obvious that he wasn't just talking about the loss of few IAF aircraft that were shot down by the PAF. However, as happens news gradually creeps out.
In it's operations across the LOC, PAF engaged some half a dozen ground targets, but as repeatedly mentioned, the mission was not to destroy these ground targets but hit the adjacent areas to deliver the message. Apart from giving a violent wake up call the the Indian Army Chief resting in the Brigade HQ, PAF also targeted the grounds of a huge Arms & Ammunition supply facility of Indian Army. Albeit, not directly hit but the shock waves and vibrations from 1000 kg bombs had all but collapsed the structure and caused tons of shells to fall down resulting in their fuses being made redundant.

Another day another claim.

 

[untitled]

The air battle has unfortunately completely eclipsed the PAF Mirage strike.

 

[Windjammer]

Amazing thing is that this OP actually believes his own creations of fantasy

Cheers , carry on !

Better than that as it causes certain characters into a knee jerk .

Another day another claim.

You are not compelled to read or believe it if it's hard to digest.

 

[Windjammer]

" causes certain character s into a knee jerk " ?
Some one turned into a knee jerk , just by reading your English posts ?!? Wow ! This is more believable than your original post

What is a knee jerk anyway?

Tell me do you have any purpose to be on this forum....apart from being a waste of space.
Changing your ID hasn't increased your brain cell count ....has it.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

FACT.....even Indians admitting PAF attacked certain facilities but as they like to put it......it missed it's targets.
They are going as far as claiming that a tree deflected 1000 kg bomb.

Don’t think the tree ‘deflected the bomb’. The goal was to strike away from the actual structures so a tree was probably in the area targetted.

Amazing thing is that this OP actually believes his own creations of fantasy

Cheers , carry on !

What part is fantasy?

 

[Telescopic Sight]

To the OP
Forget me now, I don't matter.

what's the latest on the damage to the Indian fuses ? Are these fuses for bulbs or cars? How did you find out anyway?

I am such a big fan of your writing, really !

 

[Windjammer]

Don’t think the tree ‘deflected the bomb’. The goal was to strike away from the actual structures so a tree was probably in the area targetted.


What part is fantasy?

But as Indians put it, the building survived due to the tree.
Love to see which tree can withstand a 1000 kg bomb.

 

[untitled]

which tree can withstand a 1000 kg bomb.

If a tree is obliterated by a 1000 kg bomb, do it's splintered pieces make a sound while they rain down?

 

[Windjammer]

To the OP
Forget me now, I don't matter.

what's the latest on the damage to the Indian fuses ? Are these fuses for bulbs or cars? How did you find out anyway?

I am such a big fan of your writing, really !

Maybe it was fuses for the spice 2000....that entered the building without damaging any structure,
And why don't you put yourself to some good use and ask your Netas, how sitting in Delhi they can do a body count in Pakistan.

 

[Fenrir]

Modern fuses are shock resistant and for larger bombs the that's especially true. One bomb dropped near another bomb doesn't suddenly render either inert or prematurely detonated.

Disposal of large munitions generally requires physically removing the fuse.

Blast shocks can defuse munitions, but typically do so against less sensitive explosives like IEDs. Most modern anti-tank mines are blast resistant to limit the effect of MCLCs and blast clearing.

In 1967 USS Forrestal was subjected to both fire and bomb detonations due to "heat cook-off", but the explosion from the Zuni Rocket that started the event, and subsequent 1000 lbs. bombs failed to detonate other explosives stored onboard the carrier. USS Forrestal served with the USN until 1993.

Shock alone doesn't render modern munitions inert or cause accidental detonations.

 

[Telescopic Sight]

Very interesting info ! Thanks for sharing!!

rare to find such a knowledgeable post !

 

[Windjammer]

^^^^^^^^^^^6

Thank you for that....but we are mostly talking about the likes of Tank, Gun and artillery shells.

 

[Khafee]

Modern fuses are shock resistant and for larger bombs the that's especially true. One bomb dropped near another bomb doesn't suddenly render either inert or prematurely detonated.

Disposal of large munitions generally requires physically removing the fuse.

Blast shocks can defuse munitions, but typically do so against less sensitive explosives like IEDs. Most modern anti-tank mines are blast resistant to limit the effect of MCLCs and blast clearing.

In 1967 USS Forrestal was subjected to both fire and bomb detonations due to "heat cook-off", but the explosion from the Zuni Rocket that started the event, and subsequent 1000 lbs. bombs failed to detonate other explosives stored onboard the carrier. USS Forrestal served with the USN until 1993.

Shock alone doesn't render modern munitions inert or cause accidental detonations.

You are forgetting, it is Indian ammo that is being discussed.

 

[untitled]

Tank, Gun

Is it possible to take out a tank by a well aimed sniper shot through the barrel of a loaded tank gun (with armor piercing ammo)?