2 years in jail, Rs500,000 fine for mocking Pakistani forces as amendment bill passed

[VCheng]

and is protecting corrupt aholes part of that ideology?

Please ask that question of those that determine what is the ideology of Pakistan, not me.

Who will put boys on trial?

Due process is important. Where is the proof of any of the allegations above?

 

[Maarkhoor]

Could you please provide the exact wording of the part of the oath that states that, please?

Don't ask for spoon feeding "Google It" if you have doubts.....Operations like rud ul fisad and zarb e azab apparently dealing with threat from inside if armed forces can do operation against terrorist then why not against traitors sitting in parliament?

 

[newb3e]

Please ask that question of those that determine what is the ideology of Pakistan, not me.

i see you defending the supposed defenders of "their ideology" i think you know the answer!

 

[VCheng]

Don't ask for spoon feeding "Google It" if you have doubts.....Operations like rud ul fisad and zarb e azab apparently dealing with threat from inside if armed forces can do operation against terrorist then why not against traitors sitting in parliament?

I do not have doubts. The wording is quite clear and it does not support your claim at all.

 

[newb3e]

Don't ask for spoon feeding "Google It" if you have doubts.....Operations like rud ul fisad and zarb e azab apparently dealing with threat from inside if armed forces can do operation against terrorist then why not against traitors sitting in parliament?

financiers and facilitators were also part of the operation! uzair balochs financier handler facilitator is zardari i dont see him in jail! infact zardari got his guy in senate and has power to bring down current govt! how and why?

 

[VCheng]

i see you defending the supposed defenders of "their ideology" i think you know the answer!

I cannot commit an illegal act.

 

[Maarkhoor]

I do not have doubts. The wording is quite clear and it does not support your claim at all.

Meaning is same.

 

[aamirzs]

About time ... I'm for this law,
People forget this law came because of Queen maryam nawaz and her father!

 

[N.Siddiqui]

Fauj are not the sacred cows...any criticism done in good faith do more good than harm.

Why PTI is tabling these bills which is actually against the fauj, will loose the high moral grounds.

 

[VCheng]

Meaning is same.

LOL! Absolutely not. Please quote the part with the meaning that you are imagining.

 

[Maarkhoor]

financiers and facilitators were also part of the operation! uzair balochs financier handler facilitator is zardari i dont see him in jail! infact zardari got his guy in senate and has power to bring down current govt! how and why?

What you want we trial him in a military court? because your civil courts filled with the most corrupt people.

LOL! Absolutely not. Please quote the part with the meaning that you are imagining.

I already gave you the reasoning.......If armed forces are allowed to do operation inside country against terrorist then how can they are not allowed to do operation to throw of traitors to save the country?

 

[Jungibaaz]

Very good thing coming from you, thanks for that but don't forget the same scoundrels save your @ss from India and others.

We should stop conflating martyrs who lay down their lives for the country and those who violate their oaths, then kick out elected governments, force other arms of the state into submission, or enrich themselves while serving. It's a tired trope. Examples of all of the above can be over-arching or mutually exclusive, so no need to nit pick for examples that don't conform.

Also, plenty of countries manage to have professional forces who both protect, and do so without violating the law or their own oaths.

 

[VCheng]

I already gave you the reasoning.......If armed forces are allowed to do operation inside country against terrorist then how can they are not allowed to do operation to throw of traitors to save the country?

Your reasoning is NOT part of the oath, which is what you claimed:

As per oath armed forces are saviors of the country not only threats from outside but also from inside.

What you contrive is illegal overreach per the Constitution. Clearly.

We should stop conflating martyrs who lay down their lives for the country and those who violate their oaths, then kick out elected governments, force other arms of the state into submission, or enrich themselves while serving. It's a tired trope. Examples of all of the above can be over-arching or mutually exclusive, so no need to nit pick for examples that don't conform.

Also, plenty of countries manage to have professional forces who both protect, and do so without violating the law or their own oaths.

Such intentional conflation would be a tired trope only if it stops working. It is still 100% potent and effective thus far, hence your counter argument cannot succeed.

 

[Maarkhoor]

Stop conflating martyrs who lay down their lives for the country and those who violate their oaths, then kick out elected governments, force other arms of the state into submission, or enrich themselves while serving. It's a tired trope. Examples of all of the above can be over-arching or mutually exclusive, so no need to nit pick for examples that don't conform.

Ahh that hurts you since more goodies coming out your mouth.....it is very easy to say separate martyrs and separate those who violated constitution just to protect the nation since these scoundrels tried to save the country from elected goons.
For armed forces the most important thing is country constitution comes later...if we loose the country just to save the bloody constitution then what we will do with constitution....tearing it off and eating pakoras on roadside...lols.....only black and white are not colors between them there are gray shades don't forget that.

What you contrive is illegal overreach per the Constitution. Clearly.

Again what is constitution? a booklet...that it ...without country it is nothing but a booklet useless one.

 

[VCheng]

Again what is constitution? a booklet...that it ...without country it is nothing but a booklet useless one.

So does that mean the military does not need to obey it because they are above the law?