Is this an Indian finally admitting that u guys do pay the likes of TTP to carry out attacks in Pak? Hmm I never thought I would see the day. It takes courage to be honest...great job.
Now as for the "good terrorist" and "bad terrorist" labels. I see that u have gotten on ur high horse and acting like u r the most righteous and just of human beings. So I'm curious if u would give me a fair unbiased answer or if ur moral compass is limited to ur own country's interest.
First I would like to know how u r defining a "terrorist". R u going to label as a "terrorist" anybody who takes up arms and carries out attacks for their own agenda as a terrorist or r u going by the western definition? The western definition is selective. It basically comes down to whether these militias r working with the west or against them and hence the whole "good" and "bad" terrorist. Here is a quick glimpse on US' view of Afghan Taliban.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/taliban-terrorists-white-house/story?id=28588120
If u r going by western standards then u saying the "good"/"bad" terrorist is like the pot calling the kettle black. But I have a feeling u r one of those just ppl whose righteousness knows no bounds. So let me ask u this, how would u classify Mukti Bahini? Their actions were the same as the actions of the currently ongoing insurgency in Indian Occupied Kashmir.
Clearly if u consider those Kashmiris, like Burhan Wani, terrorists then I'm sure u will be fair across the board and call MB "terrorist" as well. Or perhaps I'm wrong and u consider both MB and Kashmiri insurgents as "freedom fighters". In either case I'm patiently waiting for ur response.
P.S. there's a third option too btw which I have seen many Indians take instead of any of the above. That is to beat around the bush, evade answering, and be a shameless hypocrite. It is the most spineless and cowardly way out in my opinion.