cabatli_53
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2008
- Messages
- 12,808
- Reaction score
- 62
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let be honest , I expected a lot more from Turkey defense industry ,your defense industry have some world class products but if you wanted it for CAS at least made it a two engine another question aside from endurance what other benefit that design offer ?Can it defend itself if for example the airplane faces an AH-64 ? how it fare against Manpads ,usually a ypical CAS airplanes like SU-25 and A-10 can endure such punishmentCheaper and Effective way of bombing terrorists. Good edition for our army.
your drones are a lot cheaper and they won't endanger the life of your pilots also they have the option of using smaller bombs to reduce the collateral damage to civilians as the terrorist tend to mingle with civilians that is a must have in fighting themCheaper and Effective way of bombing terrorists. Good edition for our army.
Let be honest , I expected a lot more from Turkey defense industry ,your defense industry have some world class products but if you wanted it for CAS at least made it a two engine another question aside from endurance what other benefit that design offer ?Can it defend itself if for example the airplane faces an AH-64 ? how it fare against Manpads ,usually a ypical CAS airplanes like SU-25 and A-10 can endure such punishment
I can understand Hürkuş-B for training your pilots but adding some weapon to it and use it for CAS in Hürkuş-C is endangering the life of your pilots don't forget according to TAI your Airforce is supposed to use the airplane for the next 35 years .
your drones are a lot cheaper and they won't endanger the life of your pilots also they have the option of using smaller bombs to reduce the collateral damage to civilians as the terrorist tend to mingle with civilians that is a must have in fighting them
you see I have a question , an Armored division in 1970 had more option dealing an Airplane in CAS role or an Insurgent group in 2020 . (thanks to proliferation of Manpads by certain government )Look what you are comparing, these fighters are designed for destroying tanks in the cold ware area. Present days are used as a CAS mission but are still expensive.
Let be honest , I expected a lot more from Turkey defense industry ,your defense industry have some world class products but if you wanted it for CAS at least made it a two engine another question aside from endurance what other benefit that design offer ?Can it defend itself if for example the airplane faces an AH-64 ? how it fare against Manpads ,usually a ypical CAS airplanes like SU-25 and A-10 can endure such punishment
I can understand Hürkuş-B for training your pilots but adding some weapon to it and use it for CAS in Hürkuş-C is endangering the life of your pilots don't forget according to TAI your Airforce is supposed to use the airplane for the next 35 years .
your drones are a lot cheaper and they won't endanger the life of your pilots also they have the option of using smaller bombs to reduce the collateral damage to civilians as the terrorist tend to mingle with civilians that is a must have in fighting them
United State use its c130 for that.Hurkus-C can loiter for 6 hours with a full weapons load, has integrated E/O.
Hurkus-C Advantages
1. It's many times more cheaper to operate and maintain than any of planes you've listed.
2. It's faster than many of the UAVs in operation, since it's not designed for long loitering times. Allows for quick response for CAS requests.
3. Self defense suite has been integrated - It's the only-plane-in-its-class to have full electronic self defense suite.
United States is also looking heavily into turbo-prop CAS planes.
Air Force tests two turboprops as potential A-10 “replacements”
God, I hate when they show such views of simulators , instead of first person views of the trainee.
Here you can see joint simulation training, the other pilot is in another simulator at Havelsan facilities.
building a modern simulator is just as hard as building an airplanes
If I'm not wrong only 6 country in the world build modern aircraft simulators .for many years we imported those system last year we built one for bell 206 and one for Cesna 172Havelsan is one of the unique institute which is able to design/develop and produce simulator technologies from hardware to image/graphic generator softwares. They have a wide range of products from airliners to helicopters, fighters, submarine, artillery simulators...etc