1971 and a bit of alternative history. What if Sheik Mujib became PM of Pakistan

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Not mistake but a fatal misjudgement made in good faith - - - - - -.

They are the friends of our enemies - Jinnah at the Dhaka University in 1948 seeing the discontent among the students at the behest of their Hindu masters

BD folks are like termites - Amit Shah, President of BJP and the principal architect behind the overwhelming victory of Hindutva in India

Unfortunately, Jinnah can't change Tekdir!!! He tried his best to liberate the BD Muslims from the clutches of the Permanent Settlement of the Hindu tyranny and oppression!!! But, BD folks find the ultimate solace in the fact that they're voluntarily living like "termites" in the Hindu households!!!!

 

[AMG_12]

@Indus Pakistan

 

[monitor]

he was good mislim good man good politician but they wiped him out with family and even kids ?what this mean sir ?


beta it was Pakistan you are here otherwise sardar patel and nehro eat so many countries bigger and older then BD today . you guys need to learn .

let alone creating new countries

That's true if we got independent in 47 our independent could threatened by India but nobody Cam predict future so a separate country was consider

 

[El Sidd]

Tekdir

Mukkedir binds them to a ritualistic betrayal.

 

[Imran Khan]

That's true if we got independent in 47 our independent could threatened by India but nobody Cam predict future so a separate country was consider

you can not get freedom in 1947 its mpossible to think that congress will allow a small country like BD in 1947 while they capture hyderabad juna gardh kashmir mysore etc .


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_princely_states_of_British_India_(by_region)

 

[Kompromat]

India benefited immensely by creating Bangladesh. It is not having to maintain military on two fronts anymore.

 

[VikingRaider]

he was good mislim good man good politician but they wiped him out with family and even kids ?what this mean sir ?

Well what is your opinion about Ziaur rahman ? He was also killed by some spoiled army guy .
And Just think man, what type of filthy bastards can kill the 10 years old son of mujib . Ok let's assume for a second that Mujib was a bad man . So what wrong his 10 years old kid done? Nothing right ?
The Kid name sheikh Russel who cried and said to the butcher that he want to meet his mother . Then that killer told him that he will take him to his mother . And then killed him. What is your justification about it? Didn't Muhammad pbuh say that no one is guilty for another one's sin? Didn't he say that a son must not be punished because of his father's sin .
So okay even if the killers are a good and mujib is bad, then still can the killers kill an innocent boy ? No right? So who can kill innocent boys , surely they are not good folks .
And also does not matter if mujib was good or bad , nothing justify his murder .
No one can take law in their hand .
So if some criminals killed Mujib that does not mean that all army were involved or he ( mujib ) a bad man , or bad muslim.

 

[313ghazi]

It was never going to work. The Bangladeshis never bought into an idea of a nation state, they were obsessed with geography and thier ethnic identity. You can see from the secularist path they've taken they didn't even have the joint religious identity.

Pakistan only works if we put our national identity ahead of our ethnic identity and our national identity is largely tied up with our religious identity. We do that, they don't.

 

[Imran Khan]

Well what is your opinion about Ziaur rahman ? He was also killed by some spoiled army guy .
And Just think man, what type of filthy bastards can kill the 10 years old son of mujib . Ok let's assume for a second that Mujib was a bad man . So what wrong his 10 years old kid done? Nothing right ?
The Kid name sheikh Russel who cried and said to the butcher that he want to meet his mother . Then that killer told him that he will take him to his mother . And then killed him. What is your justification about it? Didn't Muhammad pbuh say that no one is guilty for another one's sin? Didn't he say that a son must not be punished because of his father's sin .
So okay even if the killers are a good and mujib is bad, then still can the killers kill an innocent boy ? No right? So who can kill innocent boys , surely they are not good folks .
And also does not matter if mujib was good or bad , nothing justify his murder .
No one can take law in their hand .
So if some criminals killed Mujib that does not mean that all army were involved or he ( mujib ) a bad man , or bad muslim.

i am not adovcating the killers but i want to know why someone took that extreme steps . my question is even in our whole bloody history we never seen such barbaric act in paksitan that some killed whole damn family including kids of a political leader . i think they have got some serious very hard issue with mujib otherwise no one do such acts . no sane human can defend that crime . TBH we paksitanis just forget bangladesh till internet came to our lives and its revive now . even now millions of our youngsters don't know what happen in 1971 . about after 1971 we have just missed it . all army never involve in even wars sir . it was BD army make it simple no need to wash the hands .

 

[Homo Sapiens]

beta it was Pakistan you are here otherwise sardar patel and nehro eat so many countries bigger and older then BD today . you guys need to learn .

let alone creating new countries

Do not talk rubbish.Which bigger and older country are you talking about which patel and nehru grabbed? The biggest state India annexed was State of Hyderabad.It was a land-locked state and lies deep within Deccan plateau entirely surrounded by Indian territory from all sides. A 87 percent Hindu majority state ruled by a minority Muslim ruling class, common Hindus were agitating to join India. Indian rulers could not think any other option other than annexing it by any means.

On the other hands, East Bengal was 3 times more populated then Hyderabad state, 75 percent muslim who were at the forefront of demanding a separate muslim state. Do you think, congress leadership was fool to try to reoccupy such a big and hostile muslim population? You seems to forget every times that East Bengal was bigger than all your west Pakistani provinces and states put together.It was not like Kashmir, Junagarh, Goa or Sikkim.

So we owe current Pakistan nothing, it is you, Pakistanis, who should thank us for freeing you from Hindu domination.Without Bengali muslims, Jinnah had no chance.

 

[UKBengali]

It was never going to work. The Bangladeshis never bought into an idea of a nation state, they were obsessed with geography and thier ethnic identity. You can see from the secularist path they've taken they didn't even have the joint religious identity.

Pakistan only works if we put our national identity ahead of our ethnic identity and our national identity is largely tied up with our religious identity. We do that, they don't.

Dude......

Punjabis wanted to deny the natural right of Bengalis to rule and dominate Pakistan. At separation, there was more Bengalis than all the other ethnic groups combined.
If Punjabis allowed Bengalis to rule in 1971, then the country would not have split then, and may even have stayed as a loose federation with the central government only responsible for foreign policy and defence.

 

[Imran Khan]

Do not talk rubbish.Which bigger and older country are you talking about which patel and nehru grabbed? The biggest state India annexed was State of Hyderabad.It was a land-locked state and lies deep within Deccan plateau entirely surrounded by Indian territory from all sides. A 87 percent Hindu majority state ruled by a Muslim ruling class, common Hindus were agitating to join India. Indian rulers could not think any other thing other than annexing it by any means.

On the other hands, East Bengal was 3 times more populated then Hyderabad state, 75 percent muslim who were at the forefront of demanding a separate muslim state. Do you think, congress leadership was fool to try to reoccupy such a big and hostile muslim population? You seems to forget every times that East Bengal was bigger than all your west Pakistani provinces and states put together.It is not like Kashmir, Junagarh, Goa or Sikkim.

lollzzz you are dreaming rubbish kid


bangladesh - 147,570km
hyderabad state 215,339 km
kashmir - 224000 km

east bengal was bigger then punjab sindh KPK

kid even only punjab is bigger then you . what they feed you guys cow dung ?

bangladsh -147,570km

balochistan 347,190 km
punjab 205,344 km
sindh 140,914 km
KPK - 101,741 km

they will never devide bengal and you will be another UP bihar today . you know a jack arse of history of sardar patel then . total 600 states of india were given rights to select whom they want and iron man took each corner of the india . only three states left and he took with power . and they will allow you to make a tiny country of 174000km ? they want to takeover paksitan with in one year kid

Dude......

Punjabis wanted to deny the natural right of Bengalis to rule and dominate Pakistan. Atseparation, there was more Bengalis than a the other ethnic groups combined.
If Punjabis allowed Bengalis to rule in 1971, then the country would not have split then, and may even have stayed as a loose federation with the central government only responsible for foreign policy and defence.

thanks to punjabis then

 

[313ghazi]

Dude......

Punjabis wanted to deny the natural right of Bengalis to rule and dominate Pakistan. Atseparation, there was more Bengalis than a the other ethnic groups combined.
If Punjabis allowed Bengalis to rule in 1971, then the country would not have split then, and may even have stayed as a loose federation with the central government only responsible for foreign policy and defence.

You might be right, but it wasn't the only rigged election in Pakistan. We've not had the country split since. Even the war on terror couldn't manage that despite most of the victims being pukhtun.

By the sounds of it, the ethnic card was played hard.

 

[Psychic]

Had he been allowed to become the pm of PAKISTAN we wouldn't have lost 1.5 million people in the hand of barbaric PAK army.

Are these the revised figures?

Thank god it didn't happen and BD became an independent country which has already left Pakistan in dust and on its way to become the economic powerhouse of South Asia.

Yet three million slum dwelling Bengalis are begging for Pakistani citizenship.
Why doesn't your economic powerhouse take them back as a start.

Funny thing is he actually believes it.

And what do you believe?

That 3 million were killed and 300000 of your women were raped by mere 35000 men.
Tells a lot about the stuff you lot are made of. (Beghairat stuff)

 

[Imran Khan]

You might be right, but it wasn't the only rigged election in Pakistan. We've not had the country split since. Even the war on terror couldn't manage that despite most of the victims being pukhtun.

By the sounds of it, the ethnic card was played hard.

yahya - mujeeb - bhutto - were punjabis