Now, now, Delnavaz. Lets not fool ourselves here. When a country goes to war, the economy goes down, besides this is pre 90's, you guys were sitting there enjoying your little boom. You guys creamed yourselves when we lost in 62' so you decided to take advantage. I personally congratulate you for defending lahore. Let this be a reminder to never set foot in Kashmir again. History has a bad habit of repeating itself.
Yes there were no reported
"famine" in Pakistan after the war.. India was struck with Economic repercussions as so because being a Already hugely troubled state in the 1960s,Bihar famine of 1966 can be one example.However I can't understand the stupidity of some members who say India gained more territory?
Pakistan was actually successful in occupying Indian territories hence it setup pill box defenses along its occupied
territories,India had a 3x larger Infantry than Pakistan
700,000 Indian Infantry
700+ aircrafts(IAF performed extremely poorly in the war)
720 Tanks
Pakistani forces
260,000 Infantry
280 aircrafts
756 Tanks(Fought valiantly but lost more tanks)
As per offical records
India it Just got back what It lost,Pakistan didn't loose any significant territory In fact we went in Screwed Indians up and when Indians came spilling like cockroaches in Greater numbers Pakistan had to fall back.
I have read fair enough analysis of the MBT's both sides had during the war.
The Indian centurion tank was by far a better than the Pakistani tanks,British tanks have always been ahead of the American tanks,Just like the Armour protection of Challenger is far better than M1Abrams
Pakistan should've not had the chaffes (Light Medium tanks) Or simply Light tanks.
Below is a answer from a Guy who personally drove both of these tanks.
Dave Sherry, Tank Commander, Tech Diver, motorbike rider, and I have been to both countries..
Interesting. Laser-based night vision on the M48? I think not. The generlaisations you amke in repect of the tanks is really quite appalling. While the statsis of the M48 appear better, in fact in tanks it's is all about cross country mobility, armour and firepower. In all respects the Centurion out performed the M48
killing the pakistani tanks at long range with no fear of retaliation. The M48 was effectively a lighter descendent of the Pershing, thinner armour and torsion bar suspension. i
t was neither as well armoured as the Centurion whcih also had a superior gun the L7 105MM that outranged and hit harder than the US guns.
Initially, the Pakistanis made the Indian army retreat to defensive positions to which then the Pakistanis advanced in an unsophisticated attack. This led to a large numebr of their vehicles being destroyed not just by RCL but mainly by the centurions.
(Google answer for source)
As for pictures how about these ones
Indian Prisoners of War (POWs) captured during 1965 war participating in three-legged race in a POW camp.
Pakistani soldiers celebrating after hoisting a Pakistani flag on an Indian check post, while on right, Indian flag is being replaced by the Pakistani one.
Pakistani soldiers atop captured Indian tanks.(Shermans)
Pakistani Desert Force after capturing the Loganewala posts.
Pakistani soldiers pose in front of a captured tank of India’s Poona Horse Regiment.
A Pakistani soldier standing next to the signboard of Muanbao Railway Station.