"Origination of Envision is not a collective effort". Envision comes from a single point which is supported and driven by collective effort. It reminds me a famous quote from Abraham Lincoln "I dont stand for what is popular but I stand for what I believe in". He was one of most unpopular US president ever seen and it was not easy to sell his vision to the nation.
Now if you ask every Bhuka Nanga bengali to become Lincoln than I am sorry. They are not fit for the job. But if you come up with a revolutionary vision than I can guarantee that you will find those Bhuka Nanga bengalis by your side. They did it everytime but were left behind.
And your Bengali/Bangladeshi split, its just a fiction of so called urban warrior. Ask any ordinary citizen on the street, they will just make fun about those funny politicians who made that a deal after all.
I didn't say we have to compare ourselves to the US
Nor did I say that there has to be a revolution in Bangladesh.
Mujib in fact did have a vision. Albeit a good one. The problem was that he wasn't able to articulate it properly due to the fact that he made friends and alliances with bad people. That made him set up a one-party state and since things weren't going smoothly, the guy paid with his life.
I understand that most Bangladeshis want food on their table, a roof over their heads, and lead a comfortable life. But that alone isn't enough. The chaotic politics of Bangladesh explains it all. And that's exactly what the Bangladeshis worked toward.
You have no vision, you have no idea where you want to go. Yes, it is that simple! And not a single leader in Bangladesh had been able to do that other than trading cheap shots at each other and trolling.
Can there be a revolution in Bangladesh? It is said that the Liberation War was an unfinished revolution. Only time will tell. And the factors are there.
Sorry Zakir Bhai....but i compelled to hate BNP more than i hate AL.
First Pakistani ever.
AL people are Anti Pakistan was an Open Secret throughout 1948-1971
There was no Awami League in 1948.
but Where are BNP minded poeple in that period.....if they are against AL idealogy than why don't they felt their presence in 1970 Elections at least?? JI and Razakars were alone defending Pakistan Idealogy and still defending their deeds courageously on AL onslaught while BNP opt only to live in the headlines on JI/Razakars sacrifices.
What's wrong with having another party other than just AL?
And there were good reasons for the founding of BNP. Look up the history of the Mujib-era.
No offence but for me they are simply cowards first and than oppotunists at best, The recent by polls elections expose BNP popularity very much and i simply prey to God to wipe them out completely in next GE. AL wins no problem bcz For Pakistan BNP proves just good for nothing anyways in past, At least AL policies force eventually Bengladeshi people to turns towards Islamist Parties one day IA who have the gutts and courage to tie the bull by horns...!!
You prey God? wtf
Are you saying that the BNP works for Pakistani interests alone in Bangladesh? Or that it relies on Pakistani funds?
Pakistan's problems and Bangladesh's problems are completely different. No use bringing them under the same microscope. I fail to understand why some people tend to relate Bangladesh's problems to Pakistan's.
And betting on Indian Army to slaughter a party with whom many Bangladeshis support? That's really cute.
If you want Bangladesh to do well and be independent, then do respect the opinions of Bangladeshis. You nor the Indian Army do not have any right to deny that sovereignty.
