What's new

16th December 1971: From East Pakistan to Bangladesh

Good that you are posting these. The tout Pakistanis have been lying for long.

Well Thanks. These are official NY Times reports filled with great details (minutiae) and can be seen as neutral and factual as seen by a Westerner. There is a heck of a lot more that needs to be posted in the series and I have made an effort to be neutral (in any comments) instead of being biased as a Bangladeshi.

This guy's (Schanberg) understanding of our politics was (and remains) extremely clear. Maybe both former East and West Pakistanis can understand the actual reasons behind and leading up to December 1971 through these reports.

I am pretty sure that a lot of what was going on in 1971 was not available as news in West Pakistan and later swept under the rug by controlling the media.

A Nation on the Verge Of Flying Apart; Pakistan

— SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 21, 1971

DACCA, Pakistan—“If you are united, there is no power on earth which can prevent you from getting Pakistan.”

These words were spoken to a Bengali crowd in East Pakistan 25 years ago by Mohammad All Jinnah, head of the Muslim League and father of the unlikely two‐part country known as Pakistan, whose east and west wings are separated not only by 1,000 miles of Indian territory but also by their different cultures and languages.

Pakistan came into being in 1947, a year after the late Mr. Jinnah's speech, but if the East Pakistanis ever shared any of his feelings of unity, that day Is long past. The two wings are now con fronting each other like two enemy countries.

In this recent escalation of animosity, the 75 million Bengalis of East Pakistan, led by Sheik Mujibur Rahman, have taken de facto control of their province, defying the martial‐law regime imposed here by the central Government in West Pakistan and obeying only the directives of the Sheik and his Awami League party.

The armed forces, an instrument of West Pakistan, have reinforced their garrisons in the East; tension is high and many Bengalis fear an army bloodbath to prevent them from gaining independence, or even a large measure of self rule. Clashes between civilians and West Pakistani soldiers erupt occasionally.

Gen. Yahya Khan Army Commander‐in‐Chief and the President of Pakistan since he took over as martial‐law ruler after the fall of the Ayub Khan Government amid bloody riots two years ago— has flown here from the West to try to resolve the crisis through talks with Sheik Mujibur.

The talks are really moving now, after several days of little discernible progress. But few details are known, and it is difficult to tell what formula of self ‐ rule will emerge to satisfy East Pakistan's determination to end the long domination and economic exploitation by West Pakistan.

The Sheik's Student and worker followers have been screaming for total independence since early this month, when West Pakistani troops killed scores of Bengali civilians.

The Bengalis had been staging protest demonstrations against President Yahya's last ‐ minute postponement of the National Assembly, in which more populous East Pakistan had won a clear majority in national elections last December.

Sheik Mujibur would settle for something just, short of independence—perhaps for two largely self‐ruling regions and a central government with powers restricted to defense and some foreign policy matters.

The present speculation— and in this mercurial situation it could change over night—is that the talks will produce some temporary arrangement for transferring power from the military to civilians. This could mean the establishment of interim governments in each of the five provinces (the four provinces of West Pakistan, plus East Pakistan) until the National Assembly, now re-scheduled to convene on Thursday, adopts a new constitutional structure, for the country.

After the Army killings early this month, the Sheik made some new demands, including immediate transfer of power to the people's representatives and the lifting of martial law. It is expected that martial law will be softened, if not lifted, during the interim period.

The confrontation across the bargaining table in Dacca is ironic in that Sheik Mujibur and President Yahya are not enemies. General Yahya was the first Pakistani President to acknowledge the West's exploitation of the East and to try to do some thing to end it by holding elections according to the one‐man, one‐vote procedure, which gave East Pakistan the dominant voice.

That comprehension of East Pakistan's grievances is one reason for hope for a break in the deadlock.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Top West Pakistan Leader Talks With Yahya in Dacca
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 22, 1971

DACCA, Pakistan, March 21— West Pakistan's dominant political leader, Zulfikar All Bhutto, the last awaited participant in the talks here over East Pakistan's demands for self rule, arrived in Dacca today under heavy military guard. Hostile crowds of East Pakistanis waved fists and shouted, “Murderer Bhutto, go home!”

A few hours after his arrival, Mr. Bhutto, a former Foreign Minister, had a meeting with President Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan, but details of the discussions were not disclosed.

The leader of East Pakistan, Sheik Mujibur Rahman, also held an unscheduled meeting with President Yahya, as a resolution of the crisis between the country's eastern and western wings appeared to be nearing. Sheik Mujib is scheduled to meet with the President again tomorrow.

Many knowledgeable observers now believe that a temporary solution will emerge from the talks, in which interim civilian governments will be set up in the country's five provinces—East Pakistan plus the four provinces of West Pakistan — until the recently elected National Assembly can draft a new constitutional structure for the nation.

Since East Pakistan has a clear majority in the assembly, such a constitution, it is believed, would grant East Pakistan the full program demand ed by Sheik Mujib and his party, the Awami League.

This program would give East Pakistan broad control over its own affairs; it would be linked to the western wing, which is separated from the east by 1,000 miles of Indian territory, only by a weak central government with limited powers restricted to defense and some foreign policy matters.

Sheik Mujib has told confidants that he now expects to get more than the program he originally laid down. He recently issued some new demands to the central Government in West Pakistan, including the lifting of martial law, which has been in effect for two years, and the transfer of power to “peoples representatives,” that is, the elected members of the assembly.

Yet the belief is widespread here that the East Pakistanis' grievances over their long, domination by the western region are so deep that no matter what compromise may be worked out now, it will break down before long and the next push will be for complete independence.

Mr. Bhutto, the leader of the Pakistan Peoples' party, has become a prime target for the East Pakistani discontent. The Bengali population here largely blames him for the present trouble.

The crisis began on March 1 when President Yahya—under pressure from Mr. Bhutto and also from military and business interests that do not want to lose their hold on the East— postponed the National Assembly session that had been scheduled to open in Dacca on March 3.

In the protest demonstrations that followed in East Pakistan, West Pakistani troops killed many civilians. Since then the Bengalis have defied the martial law regime imposed here by the, central Government, and Sheik Mujib and his party have taken de facto control of the province, calling it Bangla Desh, the Bengal Nation.

The Bengalis have a new flag of their own, which they plan to unveil in great numbers on Tuesday, Pakistan Day, when countless Bangla Desh demonstrations are planned. The flag has a forest green background with a red circle in the middle; on the circle is a map of East Pakistan in gold.

President Yahya has scheduled a speech for Tuesday, and some observers think he will use it to announce an agreement. Thursday is the new date he has set for the opening of the National Assembly and it is assumed he would prefer not to postpone it again.

Except for Mr. Bhutto, who appeared to be using delaying tactics, all the major political leaders in West Pakistan flew to the East last week to hold talks separately with Sheik Mujib and the President.

When Mr. Bhutto — whose party has 81 seats in the National Assembly compared with the Awami League's majority strength of 160—flew into the East Pakistani capital this afternoon with a large entourage, the military forces gave him heavy protection.

As he and his troop escort drove into town from the airport, Bengalis along the route jeered and cursed him. When he reached the Hotel Intercontinental, where he is staying, another hostile crowd tried to swarm around him. Soldiers with automatic weapons and a civilian bodyguard with a sub machine gun forced a path through the hotel lobby to the elevator, as the Bengalis glared hatred at him and screamed, “Get out of Bangla Desh!” and “Joi Bangla!” or “Victory for Bengal!”
 
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EAST PAKISTANIS UNVEIL NEW FLAG
By SYDNEY A. SCHANDERG
MARCH 24, 1971

DACCA, Pakistan, March 23 : The President of Pakistan, who has spent eight days in the eastern wing of his country under heavy protection, came out of his walled compound for the first time today for heavily protected drive to the military cantonment on the edge of the city.

Elsewhere in Dacca and throughout the province of East Pakistan the Bengali population celebreted “resistance day“— resistance to the martial‐law regime imposed by the West Pakistan‐dominated central Government—and unveiled the new flag of “Bangla Desh,” the so called Bengal nation.

Those scenes — a President unable to travel in what is supposed to be his own country without a cordon of weapons, 70 million of his people virtually declaring secession on their own—put into focus the strangeness of the crisis that has threatened to split this Moslem country in two.

The mood, the slogans and the talk in the streets are all for independence, while at the bargaining table the three participants are still talking about trying to hold the two wings together, by however tenuous a link.

No Signs of Real Progress

The tortuous negotiations over East Pakistan's demands for self‐rule continued, and all sides kept repeating that some progress was being made. What is going on outside the talks makes it difficult to believe, however, that any compromise agreement will alter what has already happened — the take over of the province, in effect, by the Bengali people, led by Sheik Mujibur Rahman and his Awami League party.

Awami League sources said the talks were at a delicate stage. The party will wait a few days more, they added, and if an agreement cannot be reached by then on its demands for ending the western wing's long domination of the East, they will go their own way. The phrase was not further explained.

The other participants in the talks are the President, Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan, representing the army, which has ruled under martial law for two years, and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, dominant political leader in West Pakistan, who heads the Pakistan People's party.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ARTILLERY USED; Civilians Fired Upon, Sections of Dacca Are Set Ablaze
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 28, 1971

DACCA, Pakistan, March 27 —The Pakistani Army is using artillery and heavy machine guns against unarmed East Pakistani civilians to crush the movement for autonomy in this province of 75 million people.

The attack began late Thursday night without warning. West Pakistani soldiers, who predominate in the army, moved into the streets of Dacca, the provincial capital, to besiege the strongholds of the independence movement, such as the university.

There was no way of knowing how many civilians had been killed or wounded. Neither was any Information available on what was happening in the rest of the province, although there had been reports before the Dacca attack of clashes between civilians and West Pakistani soldiers in the interior.

Mr. Schanberg was one of 35 foreign newsmen expelled Saturday morning from East Pakistan. He cabled this dispatch from Bombay, India.

The firing here was at first sporadic, but by 1 A.M. yesterday it had become heavy and nearly continuous, and it remained that way for three hours. Scores of artillery bursts were seen and heard by foreign newsmen confined to the Intercontinental Hotel on threat of death.

From the hotel, which is in North Dacca, bilge fires could be seen in various parts of the city, including the University Dacca.

In a broadcast, Sheik Mujib was said to have denied a West Pakistani radio report that he had been arrested. “I'm free and all right,” he was quoted as having said. “Comrades, go ahead with your program to achieve the goal of freedom. Do not be misguided by enemy propaganda.”

The fighting between the troops of the central Government in West Pakistan and the East Pakistanis was reported to have erupted yesterday. A proclamation of the East's independence, attributed to Sheik Mujib, was also reported then.

Sheik Mujib has been campaigning for autonomy for East Pakistan, which his followers now call Bangla Desh—Bengali for Bengal Nation. The autonomy movement in the eastern wing of Pakistan, which is separated from the western wing by 1,000 miles of India, is based on the two sections' completely different cultures, languages and physical features as well as on the fact that the western wing has dominated the eastern since the Moslem country was carved from the Indian subcontinent in 1947.

Assembly Postponed

Pakistan's President, Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan, in nationwide radio broadcast last night, charged Sheik Mujib and his followers with treason and outlawed the Awami League. In three weeks of strikes and other protests against the central Government, it had in effect gained control of the region from the martial‐law authorities.

The Awami League's protest had been directed against President Yahya's decision to postpone the March 3 opening of the National Assembly, which the league would have dominated, to start drafting a constitution to return Pakistan to civilian rule.

President Yahya said in his speech that he was ordering the army to restore the Government's authority to save Pakistan's integrity. President Yahya had been in Dacca for 10 days, discussing the political crisis with Sheik Mujib and political leaders from West Pakistan. He slipped out of Dacca unannounced on Thursday and flew back to West Pakistan.

The negotiations over East Pakistan's demands for self‐rule had broken down on Thursday afternoon, although this was not known until the Army went into action.

The President said that It had been his “keenness to arrive at a peaceful solution” that kept him from taking action against Sheik Mujib “weeks ago.”

For 17 days, ever since the Army killed scores of demonstrators, the Bengali population had supported Sheik Mujib in refusing to cooperate with the martial‐law regime.

In his speech, President Yahya said the Army had been “subjected to taunts and insults of all kinds.”

“I compliment them on their great restraint and sense of discipline,” he continued. “I am proud of them.”

Indian news agencies remained the major source of news from East Pakistan. After the martial‐law administration imposed strict censorship on reporters in Dacca, news began to come out from many Indian towns bordering East Pakistan.

Sheik Mujib's forces were said to have effectively obstructed the movement of Pakistani troops by blowing up bridges and railroads; even in normal times, East Pakistan, crisscrossed by many rivers, is difficult terrain in which to move fast. Central Pakistani forces were also said to be handicapped by inadequate stocks of gasoline. The supplies must be brought in by air from West Pakistan.

Reports of More Troops

News reports quoting East Pakistani sources said that West Pakistan was flying more troops into Dacca's airport to reinforce the 70,000 men already in the East. Meanwhile new martial‐law regulations were broadcast to warn people against putting up barricades on roads and on airport run ways.

According to one report of the fighting, Pakistani Government troops were forced to withdraw with heavy casualties after attacking a center of the East Pakistan Rifles in Khulna.

In Daulatpur, near Khulna, West Pakistani troops were re ported to have fired into a crowd, killing 90 civilians. Re ports also said that West Pakistani soldiers were shelling and burning houses and factories as Awami League volunteers poured into towns from their villages and attacked the troops.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heavy Killing Reported
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 30, 1971

NEW DELHI, March 29—In its battle to put down the independence movement in East Pakistan, the Pakistani army has resorted to widespread killings of civilians, according to reports reaching here today from unimpeachable foreign diplomatic sources in Dacca.

These reports were confined to Dacca, a city of 1,500,000 people, and all the reports were confined to events up to Saturday night. The army attack began on Thursday night.

The following is a verbatim report relayed to New Delhi from these sources:

“Tanti Bazaar and Sankhari Bazaar areas of Dacca, inhabited by more than 10,000 people, were surrounded by the army. Houses were set on fire and people were being butchered. Even residents fleeing the area have not been spared.”

Another report from other highly reliable foreign diplomatic source in Dacca said the office of Ittefaq, a Bengali‐language daily newspaper, was burned with 40 persons inside.

There have been reports from the interior telling of killings of civilians, some later than Saturday, but these reports do not come from diplomatic sources and are impossible to evaluate.

Diplomatic sources in Dacca report they have received what they consider reliable reports from the interior that heavy fighting is going on in some areas between the army and civilian resistance forces, with the army strafing from the air and using tanks and heavy artillery on the ground.

The over‐all death toll is not known. The Clandestine Radio of the Resistance Movement said that 300,000 East Pakistanis were killed by West Pakistani troops in the first 48 hours of the army's attack.

Widely conflicting reports about who is winning in East Pakistan continue to flow into New Delhi. Because of a black out of all normal news channels and communications from East Pakistan, it is impossible to tell from these unverifiable reports whether the Pakistani Army is in control and the province relatively calm, as it asserts, or whether the civilian resistance has made the army's position desperate, as the resistance has said in its clandestine broadcasts.

The fighting in East Pakistan began last Thursday night when the Pakistani army, without warning, attacked civilian population centers in an effort to crush the province's nonviolent movement for autonomy. The army units—all West Pakistani troops—opened fire with artillery, rockets and machine guns.

Since then, a resistance effort has been launched, with East Pakistani policemen and a militia called the East Pakistan Rifles fighting the army with the aid of civilians armed with knives, sticks and homemade guns.

The current crisis goes back to a decision by President Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan to postpone the meeting of the National Assembly that was to have begun to draft a constitution ending military rule.

That meeting would have been dominated by East Pakistan's principal party, the Awami League of Sheik Mujibur Rahman, which had won a clear majority in elections in December with its demands for regional autonomy.

The decision to postpone the session touched off protest demonstrations, strikes and rioting in East Pakistan, and I the army was reported to have killed scores of Bengalis. The Awami League gradually took control in East Pakistan.

Negotiations were then begun involving the President, Sheik Mujib, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the dominant political leader of West Pakistan. Despite public reports of progress as late as last Tuesday, authoritative sources now say that West Pakistani interests had decided from the start not to yield their hold on East Pakistan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUL URGES U.S. START EVACUATION IN EAST PAKISTAN
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 31, 1971

NEW DELHI, March 30—The United States consul general in East Pakistan has asked Washington to evacuate all American women and children and some of the men from the province, where the Pakistani armed forces are fighting an independence movement.

Reports from the highest authority said that the consul general, Archer K. Blood, made the recommendation to Washington yesterday or today on the ground that foreigners are no longer safe in East Pakistan. There are about 1,000 Americans in East Pakistan.

[United States officials in Washington said the Administration had not yet made a, final decision and that therefore the Pakistani Government had not been asked for official permission for evacuation planes to land at Dacca. They said that the State Department was in continuing communication with the Consulate General in the East Pakistani capital and that the city was reported to be, quiet.]

Action Began Last Week

Some officials at the United States Embassy in New Delhi were reportedly characterizing the events in East Pakistan, as “a massacre” of civilians there by West Pakistani troops. The embassy is believed to have official information on events there.

The military action in East Pakistan began last Thursday night. However, some foreign missions in Dacca evacuated their women, children and nonessential men early this month when the first fears of widespread violence in the province arose.

The British, are reportedly coordinating their evacuation plans with the Americans. In London, the Foreign Office said that no steps had yet been taken to carry out the planning but that the situation was being kept under constant review.

Meanwhile, the reports on what is happening in East Pakistan continued to be wildly conflicting.

The Government, through the Pakistan radio in West Pakistan, said the situation in all the major towns and the entire countryside of East Pakistan was normal, with the military in control. Broadcasts by the resistance movement said the troops from West Pakistan were retreating everywhere, with the resistance troops in control of most parts of the province, including Dacca.

However, most independent reports reaching New Delhi indicate that in Dacca at least the army is in fairly firm control. A group of Yugoslav evacuees whose plane stopped in New Delhi on its way to Belgrade said the situation in Dacca was generally quiet, but tense.

Curfew Ends in Daytime

They said that large numbers of West Pakistani soldiers were patrolling the city but that the curfew had been lifted during daytime hours. They said they had seen shops open on their way to the airport.

Making it difficult to evaluate many of the reports on events in East Pakistan is the fact that all foreign newsmen were expelled from there last weekend and that there has been a total blackout there of all normal news channels. In addition, all dispatches from West Pakistan are subject to strict censorship.

The Pakistan radio reported that the Pakistani Government had lodged its second protest in three days with India, accusing the New Delhi Government of “continued interference in Pakistan's internal affairs.” The protest objected especially to the Indian press reports coming from points near the East Pakistani border that are continuing to report heavy fighting by resistance groups against the army.

Shootings Reported

Unimpeachable independent sources in New Delhi said that in the early stages of the fighting the army had dragged high, officials of the nationalist movement out of their houses and shot them dead. These sources described the officials as leaders of the Awami League, East Pakistan's dominant political party, but said they had not included Shiek Mujibur Rahman, the party chief and political leader of East Pakistan.

The army says it arrested Sheik Mujib last Friday morning at his Dacca residence, but a radio station that says it is the voice of the resistance movement says he is alive and free.

Also according to the independent sources, three British subjects were lined up by the army against a wall in Dacca for execution when diplomats from the British mission arrived in time to save them. The three men were not members of the mission.

The sources also reported “eyewitness accounts” of “massacres of civilians” by West Pakistani troops in areas throughout East Pakistan. These killings are still going on, the sources said.

Broadcasts attributed to the resistance movement said that the Pakistani Army's “invading forces” had virtually destroyed the port city of Chittagong by a concentrated sea, air and artillery bombardment but that the “freedom fighters”, were still holding out there.

A Differing Account

The. Pakistan radio, on the other hand, said the situation in Chittagong, like that in, the rest of the province, was normal.

“Some miscreants who created disturbances have been effectively put down,” it added.

While the military action in East Pakistan began last Thursday night with an attack by West Pakistani troops on civilian population centers, the current crisis dates from March 1.

On that date, President Agha, Mohammad Yahya Khan postponed a session of the National Assembly that was to have met two, days later to begin drafting a constitution returning the nation to civilian rule. That assembly, elected in December, was dominated by Sheik Mujib's Awami League, which wanted regional autonomy.

During three weeks of strikes and other protest action, Sheik Mujib's party in effect assumed control of East Pakistan. The army struck Thursday night to reassert the central military Government's authority.

Two Wings Separated

The army's biggest problem, it appears, will be the hostility, widespread among the 75 million East Pakistanis, who have long been dominated by the vested interests of the western wing, with its minority population of 55 million people. The, two parts of the country are separated by 1,000 miles of Indian territory.

Refugees fleeing the West Pakistani Army are beginning to cross into India in large numbers, and the Indian Government is mobilizing a relief effort in concert with international agencies.

Sympathy for the Bengalis, as the East Pakistanis are called, is widespread in India. Many politicians, are pressing the Government to recognize the government of Bangla Desh — Bengali for Bengal Nation. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi is expected to move a resolution of solidarity with the Bengalis in Parliament tomorrow.

All Part Of a Game – a Grim and Deadly One
— SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
APRIL 4, 1971

NEW DELHI—“All of it's necessary, absolutely necessary,” a West Pakistani stewardess lectured some expelled foreign newsmen about the Pakistani Army's offensive to crush the independence movement in East Pakistan. “If this happened in your country, you'd do the same thing. It's all part of the game.”

Pakistan: ‘All Part Of a Game’— a Grim and Deadly One

A game? To foreign newsmen in Dacca, it looked like a surprise attack with tanks, artillery and heavy machine guns against a virtually unarmed population —a population using tactics of nonviolence, mostly strikes and other forms of noncooperation, to claim the political majority it had won in last December's elections. And by this weekend enough credible reports of in discriminate killings had filtered out to leave little doubt, even in the minds of many dispassionate Indian officials and Western diplomats, that the Army of West Pakistan was under few restraints in putting down East Pakistani thoughts of autonomy.

The attack began on the night of March 25, after 10 days of political negotiations in which the army and the rest of the West Pakistani power establishment had lulled the East Pakistani nationalists into thinking their demands for greater self‐rule would be granted.

It is clear now that the West Pakistanis never meant the talks to succeed, that they dragged them out only to buy time to get enough troop reinforcements over from West Pakistan to launch the attack. But while the talks went on, nearly every observer, from newsmen to diplomats, resisted the ugly thought that this might be true. The signs were all there—troops coming in by air and sea, the dismissal of a martial‐law administrator who was too lenient and the uncharacteristic silence of the army while the East Pakistanis boycotted the military regime and followed instead the directives of their leader, Sheik Mujibur Rahman.


The newsmen reported these signs but when talk of “some progress” came out of the negotiations, they grasped upon that, because it was what should happen. They were wrong. Instead, the military mind prevailed.

Governments Silent

But in turning to force, the West Pakistani leaders apparently misjudged both its limitations and the depth of feeling of 75 million East Pakistanis. “They thought that a few bullets would scare the people off,” said Ranjit Gupta, the police commissioner in Calcutta, just across the border in India. “It is silly—it shows you how little the West Pakistanis know about East Pakistanis.”

Instead of the first shooting spree terrorizing the population into submission, it now seems apparent that while the army may be able initially to establish a hold on the cities and major towns, it will face wide spread guerrilla activity in the primitive riverine countryside. This could so undermine the supply lines and mobility of the West Pakistani troops that the independence movement would succeed.

In India, many sympathizers with the East Pakistani cause were quick to compare West Pakistan's military actions in East Pakistan with those of Hitler. “Pak Army's Inhuman Torture,” was the headline in one Calcutta newspaper. “Butchery,” said another, adding: “The vandalism unleashed by the occupying Pakistani army in Bangla Desh (Bengal Nation) is darker than even the darkest chapter of Nazi terror.” The Indian Parliament has called it “a massacre of defenseless people which amounts to genocide.”

Most of the other governments or the world have remained silent.

“Why doesn't your country condemn this outrage?”’ one official in Calcutta asked an American. “This is no tidal wave, this is no act of nature—it is people slaughtering people.”

The United States, which supplied the Pakistani military with its basic weapons and training from 1955 to 1965, has refused to release to the press accounts of army killings it has received from its consulate in Dacca, the East Pakistani Capital.

Britain has said she regrets the situation, but considers it an internal matter.

The Soviet Union has remained officially silent, although segments of the Soviet press have called the army's action “crude arbitrariness and violence.”

Communist China, Which has also been supplying Pakistan with arms in recent years, and has been wooing Pakistan hard, has said nothing.

U Thant, Secretary General of the United Nations, said after several days, of trouble in East Pakistan that he was “very much concerned about the loss of life and human suffering” and would help if the Pakistani Government asked him to assist “in humanitarian efforts,” Such a request seemed highly unlikely.

One country, Ceylon, has helped the West Pakistani military offensive by granting refueling rights to planes flying to and from East Pakistan. The two wings of Pakistan are divided by over 1,000 miles of India, which banned Pakistani overflights in February. Without this assistance from Ceylon, military reinforcements and supplies for East Pakistan would have to be brought in by sea, and Indian officials and Western diplomats here believe this would severely hamper, if not cripple, the West Pakistani Army's campaign.

Regardless of Ceylon's help to West Pakistan and the lack of help thus far to East Pakistan, there seems to be agreement here on two points—that the chances of East and West Pakistan remaining united appear nil, and that in the long run the West Pakistani Army, attempting to impose its government's will on the East Pakistanis, has little chance of success.

The Bengalis, as the people of East Pakistan are called, have stepped across a crucial line—a line that separated grumbling about their exploitation to fighting against the exploiters. The line may have been crossed on March 25, the night of the attack. Or perhaps it was crossed earlier, on March 1, when President Yahya Khan, Army Commander in Chief, postponed a session of the National Assembly that was to have convened two days later to begin drafting a Constitution returning the nation to civilian rule. That Assembly, elected in December, was dominated by Sheik Mujib's Awami League party, which wanted a large measure of provincial autonomy — leaving the Central Government with power only over defense and foreign policy, but not foreign trade and aid.

These terms were anathema to the West Pakistani power establishment—the army, the big business interests and the Politicians. In the political negotiations over the crisis, they started off by making conciliatory sounds and then brought in the Monkey wrench, Zulfikar All Bhutto, the dominant political leader of West Pakistan. When he objected that the Awami League wanted too much autonomy—“bordering on Sovereignty”—the talks began to stall. Then, suddenly, came the army attack.

The morning after the attack, Mr. Bhutto, and his aides, under heavy military protection, were flown back to friendly territory in West Pakistan, where the political leader promptly announced: “Pakistan has been saved by the grace of the Almighty.”

But it will take more than religious oratory to save Pakistan as a united Moslem country, Religion was the social glue that was supposed to have held the two wings together, but it was never enough.

1947 Partition

Pakistan, carved out of the Indian subcontinent in 1947 as the child of Hindu‐Moslem hostility, was intended as a home land for the Moslem Bengalis of East Pakistan and the Moslem Punjabis, Sindhis and Pathans of West Pakistan. But the 55 million West Pakistanis held all the political, economic and military power, and East Pakistan, although the majority wing, quickly became what amounted almost to an exploited colony, a golden market for the manufactured products of the western wing. Prices were higher in the east, income lower.

A severe racial and cultural gap also festered. The two wings of Pakistan have always been further apart in most important respects than most independent countries. In that sense, the Bengalis are fighting to dislodge from their soil a foreign occupation army.

It may take a long time, but none of the witnesses to the recent upsurge of Bengali nationalism and to the barbarism of the army attack doubts that it will happen. In the meantime, as Sheik Mujib was fond of chanting with the adoring crowds that thronged to his now razed house: “Sangram, sangram. Cholbey, cholbey.” “The fight will go on, The fight will go on.”
 
.
Yes and It's little different case and not strong or rational logic here when we make a comparison of two migrants ,( in this sense Muslims are also African like Hindus) .

However we need to focus on archaeological evidences of Indus valley civilisation that was utterly destroyed by outsider Hindus ,and also from various books of the time . We already know the fight between aryans vs non aryans , we know that how Indra destroyed hundreds of cities and got the epithet of Purandar .

So I am afraid that this logic also apply for Aryans .

:-)

Aryans and vedic time dont imprint religious edifices completely foreign to the region today. Are the holy pilgrimage sites of dharmic religions outside the subcontinent for example?

So it is entirely different in scale and reach of what originated here and what invaded and imposed...not to mention the time and brutality involved.

There is no evidence for destruction of IVC by aryans either...in fact most evidence shows the main part of IVC collapsed well before the Aryan migration to the subcontinent.

Not to mention the dharmic religions of today I am talking of as indigenous evolved many streams downwards from the original vedic religion (so much so that much is not recognisable to vedic religion and even philosophy)....often combining local animism and postulated IVC remnant culture even.

Your religion allows for precisely zero of that kind of thing....because it in itself came about well after the iron age (the main civilisational process w.r.t writing history and developing culture that lasts to modern time) was over....and its whole intent was to conquer and dominate and become the sole culture for the world. Every bit of actual legal/political implementation of this religion illustrates this.

It comes down to its root to...what is the underlying concept of the fate of those that are not part of your system. Can they be morally good as well...can they reach your heaven? Or are they doomed to punishment? What is the equivalent for the dharmic religions?...why do they say all roads lead to the same goal in contrast (and that morality can be universal to every system of higher belief)?...this is all significant in the psyche in the end....and yes very much is why it can manifest as Hindu Bengalis having no interest in your Bengali larger state....they prefer their actual cultural kin where it matters the most.
 
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EAST PAKISTANIS UNVEIL NEW FLAG
By SYDNEY A. SCHANDERG
MARCH 24, 1971

DACCA, Pakistan, March 23 : The President of Pakistan, who has spent eight days in the eastern wing of his country under heavy protection, came out of his walled compound for the first time today for heavily protected drive to the military cantonment on the edge of the city.

Elsewhere in Dacca and throughout the province of East Pakistan the Bengali population celebreted “resistance day“— resistance to the martial‐law regime imposed by the West Pakistan‐dominated central Government—and unveiled the new flag of “Bangla Desh,” the so called Bengal nation.

Those scenes — a President unable to travel in what is supposed to be his own country without a cordon of weapons, 70 million of his people virtually declaring secession on their own—put into focus the strangeness of the crisis that has threatened to split this Moslem country in two.

The mood, the slogans and the talk in the streets are all for independence, while at the bargaining table the three participants are still talking about trying to hold the two wings together, by however tenuous a link.

No Signs of Real Progress

The tortuous negotiations over East Pakistan's demands for self‐rule continued, and all sides kept repeating that some progress was being made. What is going on outside the talks makes it difficult to believe, however, that any compromise agreement will alter what has already happened — the take over of the province, in effect, by the Bengali people, led by Sheik Mujibur Rahman and his Awami League party.

Awami League sources said the talks were at a delicate stage. The party will wait a few days more, they added, and if an agreement cannot be reached by then on its demands for ending the western wing's long domination of the East, they will go their own way. The phrase was not further explained.

The other participants in the talks are the President, Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan, representing the army, which has ruled under martial law for two years, and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, dominant political leader in West Pakistan, who heads the Pakistan People's party.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ARTILLERY USED; Civilians Fired Upon, Sections of Dacca Are Set Ablaze
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 28, 1971

DACCA, Pakistan, March 27 —The Pakistani Army is using artillery and heavy machine guns against unarmed East Pakistani civilians to crush the movement for autonomy in this province of 75 million people.

The attack began late Thursday night without warning. West Pakistani soldiers, who predominate in the army, moved into the streets of Dacca, the provincial capital, to besiege the strongholds of the independence movement, such as the university.

There was no way of knowing how many civilians had been killed or wounded. Neither was any Information available on what was happening in the rest of the province, although there had been reports before the Dacca attack of clashes between civilians and West Pakistani soldiers in the interior.

Mr. Schanberg was one of 35 foreign newsmen expelled Saturday morning from East Pakistan. He cabled this dispatch from Bombay, India.

The firing here was at first sporadic, but by 1 A.M. yesterday it had become heavy and nearly continuous, and it remained that way for three hours. Scores of artillery bursts were seen and heard by foreign newsmen confined to the Intercontinental Hotel on threat of death.

From the hotel, which is in North Dacca, bilge fires could be seen in various parts of the city, including the University Dacca.

In a broadcast, Sheik Mujib was said to have denied a West Pakistani radio report that he had been arrested. “I'm free and all right,” he was quoted as having said. “Comrades, go ahead with your program to achieve the goal of freedom. Do not be misguided by enemy propaganda.”

The fighting between the troops of the central Government in West Pakistan and the East Pakistanis was reported to have erupted yesterday. A proclamation of the East's independence, attributed to Sheik Mujib, was also reported then.

Sheik Mujib has been campaigning for autonomy for East Pakistan, which his followers now call Bangla Desh—Bengali for Bengal Nation. The autonomy movement in the eastern wing of Pakistan, which is separated from the western wing by 1,000 miles of India, is based on the two sections' completely different cultures, languages and physical features as well as on the fact that the western wing has dominated the eastern since the Moslem country was carved from the Indian subcontinent in 1947.

Assembly Postponed

Pakistan's President, Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan, in nationwide radio broadcast last night, charged Sheik Mujib and his followers with treason and outlawed the Awami League. In three weeks of strikes and other protests against the central Government, it had in effect gained control of the region from the martial‐law authorities.

The Awami League's protest had been directed against President Yahya's decision to postpone the March 3 opening of the National Assembly, which the league would have dominated, to start drafting a constitution to return Pakistan to civilian rule.

President Yahya said in his speech that he was ordering the army to restore the Government's authority to save Pakistan's integrity. President Yahya had been in Dacca for 10 days, discussing the political crisis with Sheik Mujib and political leaders from West Pakistan. He slipped out of Dacca unannounced on Thursday and flew back to West Pakistan.

The negotiations over East Pakistan's demands for self‐rule had broken down on Thursday afternoon, although this was not known until the Army went into action.

The President said that It had been his “keenness to arrive at a peaceful solution” that kept him from taking action against Sheik Mujib “weeks ago.”

For 17 days, ever since the Army killed scores of demonstrators, the Bengali population had supported Sheik Mujib in refusing to cooperate with the martial‐law regime.

In his speech, President Yahya said the Army had been “subjected to taunts and insults of all kinds.”

“I compliment them on their great restraint and sense of discipline,” he continued. “I am proud of them.”

Indian news agencies remained the major source of news from East Pakistan. After the martial‐law administration imposed strict censorship on reporters in Dacca, news began to come out from many Indian towns bordering East Pakistan.

Sheik Mujib's forces were said to have effectively obstructed the movement of Pakistani troops by blowing up bridges and railroads; even in normal times, East Pakistan, crisscrossed by many rivers, is difficult terrain in which to move fast. Central Pakistani forces were also said to be handicapped by inadequate stocks of gasoline. The supplies must be brought in by air from West Pakistan.

Reports of More Troops

News reports quoting East Pakistani sources said that West Pakistan was flying more troops into Dacca's airport to reinforce the 70,000 men already in the East. Meanwhile new martial‐law regulations were broadcast to warn people against putting up barricades on roads and on airport run ways.

According to one report of the fighting, Pakistani Government troops were forced to withdraw with heavy casualties after attacking a center of the East Pakistan Rifles in Khulna.

In Daulatpur, near Khulna, West Pakistani troops were re ported to have fired into a crowd, killing 90 civilians. Re ports also said that West Pakistani soldiers were shelling and burning houses and factories as Awami League volunteers poured into towns from their villages and attacked the troops.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heavy Killing Reported
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 30, 1971

NEW DELHI, March 29—In its battle to put down the independence movement in East Pakistan, the Pakistani army has resorted to widespread killings of civilians, according to reports reaching here today from unimpeachable foreign diplomatic sources in Dacca.

These reports were confined to Dacca, a city of 1,500,000 people, and all the reports were confined to events up to Saturday night. The army attack began on Thursday night.

The following is a verbatim report relayed to New Delhi from these sources:

“Tanti Bazaar and Sankhari Bazaar areas of Dacca, inhabited by more than 10,000 people, were surrounded by the army. Houses were set on fire and people were being butchered. Even residents fleeing the area have not been spared.”

Another report from other highly reliable foreign diplomatic source in Dacca said the office of Ittefaq, a Bengali‐language daily newspaper, was burned with 40 persons inside.

There have been reports from the interior telling of killings of civilians, some later than Saturday, but these reports do not come from diplomatic sources and are impossible to evaluate.

Diplomatic sources in Dacca report they have received what they consider reliable reports from the interior that heavy fighting is going on in some areas between the army and civilian resistance forces, with the army strafing from the air and using tanks and heavy artillery on the ground.

The over‐all death toll is not known. The Clandestine Radio of the Resistance Movement said that 300,000 East Pakistanis were killed by West Pakistani troops in the first 48 hours of the army's attack.

Widely conflicting reports about who is winning in East Pakistan continue to flow into New Delhi. Because of a black out of all normal news channels and communications from East Pakistan, it is impossible to tell from these unverifiable reports whether the Pakistani Army is in control and the province relatively calm, as it asserts, or whether the civilian resistance has made the army's position desperate, as the resistance has said in its clandestine broadcasts.

The fighting in East Pakistan began last Thursday night when the Pakistani army, without warning, attacked civilian population centers in an effort to crush the province's nonviolent movement for autonomy. The army units—all West Pakistani troops—opened fire with artillery, rockets and machine guns.

Since then, a resistance effort has been launched, with East Pakistani policemen and a militia called the East Pakistan Rifles fighting the army with the aid of civilians armed with knives, sticks and homemade guns.

The current crisis goes back to a decision by President Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan to postpone the meeting of the National Assembly that was to have begun to draft a constitution ending military rule.

That meeting would have been dominated by East Pakistan's principal party, the Awami League of Sheik Mujibur Rahman, which had won a clear majority in elections in December with its demands for regional autonomy.

The decision to postpone the session touched off protest demonstrations, strikes and rioting in East Pakistan, and I the army was reported to have killed scores of Bengalis. The Awami League gradually took control in East Pakistan.

Negotiations were then begun involving the President, Sheik Mujib, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the dominant political leader of West Pakistan. Despite public reports of progress as late as last Tuesday, authoritative sources now say that West Pakistani interests had decided from the start not to yield their hold on East Pakistan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUL URGES U.S. START EVACUATION IN EAST PAKISTAN
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
MARCH 31, 1971

NEW DELHI, March 30—The United States consul general in East Pakistan has asked Washington to evacuate all American women and children and some of the men from the province, where the Pakistani armed forces are fighting an independence movement.

Reports from the highest authority said that the consul general, Archer K. Blood, made the recommendation to Washington yesterday or today on the ground that foreigners are no longer safe in East Pakistan. There are about 1,000 Americans in East Pakistan.

[United States officials in Washington said the Administration had not yet made a, final decision and that therefore the Pakistani Government had not been asked for official permission for evacuation planes to land at Dacca. They said that the State Department was in continuing communication with the Consulate General in the East Pakistani capital and that the city was reported to be, quiet.]

Action Began Last Week

Some officials at the United States Embassy in New Delhi were reportedly characterizing the events in East Pakistan, as “a massacre” of civilians there by West Pakistani troops. The embassy is believed to have official information on events there.

The military action in East Pakistan began last Thursday night. However, some foreign missions in Dacca evacuated their women, children and nonessential men early this month when the first fears of widespread violence in the province arose.

The British, are reportedly coordinating their evacuation plans with the Americans. In London, the Foreign Office said that no steps had yet been taken to carry out the planning but that the situation was being kept under constant review.

Meanwhile, the reports on what is happening in East Pakistan continued to be wildly conflicting.

The Government, through the Pakistan radio in West Pakistan, said the situation in all the major towns and the entire countryside of East Pakistan was normal, with the military in control. Broadcasts by the resistance movement said the troops from West Pakistan were retreating everywhere, with the resistance troops in control of most parts of the province, including Dacca.

However, most independent reports reaching New Delhi indicate that in Dacca at least the army is in fairly firm control. A group of Yugoslav evacuees whose plane stopped in New Delhi on its way to Belgrade said the situation in Dacca was generally quiet, but tense.

Curfew Ends in Daytime

They said that large numbers of West Pakistani soldiers were patrolling the city but that the curfew had been lifted during daytime hours. They said they had seen shops open on their way to the airport.

Making it difficult to evaluate many of the reports on events in East Pakistan is the fact that all foreign newsmen were expelled from there last weekend and that there has been a total blackout there of all normal news channels. In addition, all dispatches from West Pakistan are subject to strict censorship.

The Pakistan radio reported that the Pakistani Government had lodged its second protest in three days with India, accusing the New Delhi Government of “continued interference in Pakistan's internal affairs.” The protest objected especially to the Indian press reports coming from points near the East Pakistani border that are continuing to report heavy fighting by resistance groups against the army.

Shootings Reported

Unimpeachable independent sources in New Delhi said that in the early stages of the fighting the army had dragged high, officials of the nationalist movement out of their houses and shot them dead. These sources described the officials as leaders of the Awami League, East Pakistan's dominant political party, but said they had not included Shiek Mujibur Rahman, the party chief and political leader of East Pakistan.

The army says it arrested Sheik Mujib last Friday morning at his Dacca residence, but a radio station that says it is the voice of the resistance movement says he is alive and free.

Also according to the independent sources, three British subjects were lined up by the army against a wall in Dacca for execution when diplomats from the British mission arrived in time to save them. The three men were not members of the mission.

The sources also reported “eyewitness accounts” of “massacres of civilians” by West Pakistani troops in areas throughout East Pakistan. These killings are still going on, the sources said.

Broadcasts attributed to the resistance movement said that the Pakistani Army's “invading forces” had virtually destroyed the port city of Chittagong by a concentrated sea, air and artillery bombardment but that the “freedom fighters”, were still holding out there.

A Differing Account

The. Pakistan radio, on the other hand, said the situation in Chittagong, like that in, the rest of the province, was normal.

“Some miscreants who created disturbances have been effectively put down,” it added.

While the military action in East Pakistan began last Thursday night with an attack by West Pakistani troops on civilian population centers, the current crisis dates from March 1.

On that date, President Agha, Mohammad Yahya Khan postponed a session of the National Assembly that was to have met two, days later to begin drafting a constitution returning the nation to civilian rule. That assembly, elected in December, was dominated by Sheik Mujib's Awami League, which wanted regional autonomy.

During three weeks of strikes and other protest action, Sheik Mujib's party in effect assumed control of East Pakistan. The army struck Thursday night to reassert the central military Government's authority.

Two Wings Separated

The army's biggest problem, it appears, will be the hostility, widespread among the 75 million East Pakistanis, who have long been dominated by the vested interests of the western wing, with its minority population of 55 million people. The, two parts of the country are separated by 1,000 miles of Indian territory.

Refugees fleeing the West Pakistani Army are beginning to cross into India in large numbers, and the Indian Government is mobilizing a relief effort in concert with international agencies.

Sympathy for the Bengalis, as the East Pakistanis are called, is widespread in India. Many politicians, are pressing the Government to recognize the government of Bangla Desh — Bengali for Bengal Nation. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi is expected to move a resolution of solidarity with the Bengalis in Parliament tomorrow.

All Part Of a Game – a Grim and Deadly One
— SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
APRIL 4, 1971

NEW DELHI—“All of it's necessary, absolutely necessary,” a West Pakistani stewardess lectured some expelled foreign newsmen about the Pakistani Army's offensive to crush the independence movement in East Pakistan. “If this happened in your country, you'd do the same thing. It's all part of the game.”

Pakistan: ‘All Part Of a Game’— a Grim and Deadly One

A game? To foreign newsmen in Dacca, it looked like a surprise attack with tanks, artillery and heavy machine guns against a virtually unarmed population —a population using tactics of nonviolence, mostly strikes and other forms of noncooperation, to claim the political majority it had won in last December's elections. And by this weekend enough credible reports of in discriminate killings had filtered out to leave little doubt, even in the minds of many dispassionate Indian officials and Western diplomats, that the Army of West Pakistan was under few restraints in putting down East Pakistani thoughts of autonomy.

The attack began on the night of March 25, after 10 days of political negotiations in which the army and the rest of the West Pakistani power establishment had lulled the East Pakistani nationalists into thinking their demands for greater self‐rule would be granted.

It is clear now that the West Pakistanis never meant the talks to succeed, that they dragged them out only to buy time to get enough troop reinforcements over from West Pakistan to launch the attack. But while the talks went on, nearly every observer, from newsmen to diplomats, resisted the ugly thought that this might be true. The signs were all there—troops coming in by air and sea, the dismissal of a martial‐law administrator who was too lenient and the uncharacteristic silence of the army while the East Pakistanis boycotted the military regime and followed instead the directives of their leader, Sheik Mujibur Rahman.


The newsmen reported these signs but when talk of “some progress” came out of the negotiations, they grasped upon that, because it was what should happen. They were wrong. Instead, the military mind prevailed.

Governments Silent

But in turning to force, the West Pakistani leaders apparently misjudged both its limitations and the depth of feeling of 75 million East Pakistanis. “They thought that a few bullets would scare the people off,” said Ranjit Gupta, the police commissioner in Calcutta, just across the border in India. “It is silly—it shows you how little the West Pakistanis know about East Pakistanis.”

Instead of the first shooting spree terrorizing the population into submission, it now seems apparent that while the army may be able initially to establish a hold on the cities and major towns, it will face wide spread guerrilla activity in the primitive riverine countryside. This could so undermine the supply lines and mobility of the West Pakistani troops that the independence movement would succeed.

In India, many sympathizers with the East Pakistani cause were quick to compare West Pakistan's military actions in East Pakistan with those of Hitler. “Pak Army's Inhuman Torture,” was the headline in one Calcutta newspaper. “Butchery,” said another, adding: “The vandalism unleashed by the occupying Pakistani army in Bangla Desh (Bengal Nation) is darker than even the darkest chapter of Nazi terror.” The Indian Parliament has called it “a massacre of defenseless people which amounts to genocide.”

Most of the other governments or the world have remained silent.

“Why doesn't your country condemn this outrage?”’ one official in Calcutta asked an American. “This is no tidal wave, this is no act of nature—it is people slaughtering people.”

The United States, which supplied the Pakistani military with its basic weapons and training from 1955 to 1965, has refused to release to the press accounts of army killings it has received from its consulate in Dacca, the East Pakistani Capital.

Britain has said she regrets the situation, but considers it an internal matter.

The Soviet Union has remained officially silent, although segments of the Soviet press have called the army's action “crude arbitrariness and violence.”

Communist China, Which has also been supplying Pakistan with arms in recent years, and has been wooing Pakistan hard, has said nothing.

U Thant, Secretary General of the United Nations, said after several days, of trouble in East Pakistan that he was “very much concerned about the loss of life and human suffering” and would help if the Pakistani Government asked him to assist “in humanitarian efforts,” Such a request seemed highly unlikely.

One country, Ceylon, has helped the West Pakistani military offensive by granting refueling rights to planes flying to and from East Pakistan. The two wings of Pakistan are divided by over 1,000 miles of India, which banned Pakistani overflights in February. Without this assistance from Ceylon, military reinforcements and supplies for East Pakistan would have to be brought in by sea, and Indian officials and Western diplomats here believe this would severely hamper, if not cripple, the West Pakistani Army's campaign.

Regardless of Ceylon's help to West Pakistan and the lack of help thus far to East Pakistan, there seems to be agreement here on two points—that the chances of East and West Pakistan remaining united appear nil, and that in the long run the West Pakistani Army, attempting to impose its government's will on the East Pakistanis, has little chance of success.

The Bengalis, as the people of East Pakistan are called, have stepped across a crucial line—a line that separated grumbling about their exploitation to fighting against the exploiters. The line may have been crossed on March 25, the night of the attack. Or perhaps it was crossed earlier, on March 1, when President Yahya Khan, Army Commander in Chief, postponed a session of the National Assembly that was to have convened two days later to begin drafting a Constitution returning the nation to civilian rule. That Assembly, elected in December, was dominated by Sheik Mujib's Awami League party, which wanted a large measure of provincial autonomy — leaving the Central Government with power only over defense and foreign policy, but not foreign trade and aid.

These terms were anathema to the West Pakistani power establishment—the army, the big business interests and the Politicians. In the political negotiations over the crisis, they started off by making conciliatory sounds and then brought in the Monkey wrench, Zulfikar All Bhutto, the dominant political leader of West Pakistan. When he objected that the Awami League wanted too much autonomy—“bordering on Sovereignty”—the talks began to stall. Then, suddenly, came the army attack.

The morning after the attack, Mr. Bhutto, and his aides, under heavy military protection, were flown back to friendly territory in West Pakistan, where the political leader promptly announced: “Pakistan has been saved by the grace of the Almighty.”

But it will take more than religious oratory to save Pakistan as a united Moslem country, Religion was the social glue that was supposed to have held the two wings together, but it was never enough.

1947 Partition

Pakistan, carved out of the Indian subcontinent in 1947 as the child of Hindu‐Moslem hostility, was intended as a home land for the Moslem Bengalis of East Pakistan and the Moslem Punjabis, Sindhis and Pathans of West Pakistan. But the 55 million West Pakistanis held all the political, economic and military power, and East Pakistan, although the majority wing, quickly became what amounted almost to an exploited colony, a golden market for the manufactured products of the western wing. Prices were higher in the east, income lower.

A severe racial and cultural gap also festered. The two wings of Pakistan have always been further apart in most important respects than most independent countries. In that sense, the Bengalis are fighting to dislodge from their soil a foreign occupation army.

It may take a long time, but none of the witnesses to the recent upsurge of Bengali nationalism and to the barbarism of the army attack doubts that it will happen. In the meantime, as Sheik Mujib was fond of chanting with the adoring crowds that thronged to his now razed house: “Sangram, sangram. Cholbey, cholbey.” “The fight will go on, The fight will go on.”


Where are all the lying munafiqeen now? I don't see them responding.

@UKBengali @Homo Sapiens @bluesky @TopCat
 
Last edited:
.
Guys let's not discuss off-topic items in this thread. Thread is about discussing 1971 events.

Foreign Evacuees From East Pakistan Tell of Grim Fight
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
APRIL 7, 1971

CALCUTTA, April 6—More than 100 foreign evacuees arrived here today after a 34‐hour voyage from Chittagong, East Pakistan's major port, bringing the latest eyewitness reports about the Pakistani army's attempt to suppress the independence movement.

“It's a massacre,” said, John Martinussen; a Danish student.

“We saw the army shooting civilians,” said Neil O'Toole, an American from New Rochelle, N.Y. “I don't want to say too much because I'm afraid of reprisals against our organization.” He asked that the name of his organization not be mentioned.

All foreign newsmen were expelled from the province more than a week ago, just after the army attack began. With censorship continuing, most of the information reaching the outside world is based on reports coming across the border into India.

The 119 foreigners, who arrived at the: Calcutta docks this afternoon aboard a British vessel that had been sitting in Chittagong harbor unable to Unload because of the fighting, were of 17 nationalities. The two largest groups were 37 Americans and 33 Britons.

As they came down the gangplank, of the vessel, the Clan MacNair, they were met by diplomatic officials and a crowd of Indian and foreign newsmen.

Though some of the evacuees were reluctant to talk, others painted a grim picture of Chittagong, East Pakistan's second‐largest city. Until now little has been known of how that city of 400,000 inhabitants has fared in the fighting.

The foreigners said that after several days of fighting, the army—all West Pakistani troops—had pushed the East Pakistani resistance forces out of the city.

But, they added, the army's control ends five miles outside the city, at the banks of the Karnaphuli River.

Everything from the river south, they said, is in the hands of the “liberation army,” which consists of civilians and members of the East Pakistani police, the East Pakistani Rifles and the East Bengal Regiment who have come over to the independence movement.

The foreigners said that they could hear shooting on the outskirts of the city even as they were leaving for Calcutta yesterday morning. Most of the residents have fled the city and gone into the countryside, they said.

Army Burn's Slums

In the city, where fighting broke out, early Friday morning, on March 26, the foreigners said the army had burned to the ground many of the flimsy slums of the poor, the staunchest supporters of independence.

The ashes of the bamboo huts in these neighborhoods were still smoldering, the foreigners said, as they were taken to the docks under military escort yesterday morning to be evacuated. The Pakistan Radio, speaking for the Pakistan Government, contends that all of East Pakistan is calm and that life is returning to normal.

“Nothing is calm, and nothing has come back to normal,” said. Mr. Martinussen, who came to Chittagong seven months ago with his wife Karen to study Pakistani politics as part of his master's degree program at Aarhus University in Denmark.

“They systematically burned down the districts of the poor people, apparently because they felt they couldn't search them thoroughly,” he went on. “They seemed to be enjoying killing and destroying everything.”

“Many Bengalis have been killed,” the 23‐year‐old student went on. “In the river just four days ago, you could count 400 bodies floating in one area,”

Mr. Martinussen, who related several accounts of civilians being gunned down in shops and on the street, forecast eventual victory for the 75 million East Pakistanis, who have long protested their exploitation by West Pakistan, which is situated more than 1,000 miles away across Indian territory.

Independence Movement

“So many Bengalis want their Bangla Desh,” said the slim student, “that I'm sure they will get it.”

Bangla Desh is Bengali for Bengal nation. It is the independence movement's name for East Pakistan.

His views were echoed by Mr. O'Toole, who is 26 years old. “Chittagong is controlled by the army,” he said. “It is controlled by brute force and terror. The army kept coming in. They were shooting civilians. We saw dead bodies. We smelled the stench of death.”

“There was a lot of harassment and beating,” he added, “and there was indiscriminate looting and burning by outsiders.”

Vengeance Reported

Mr. O'Toole did not explain what he meant by “outsiders”—but he apparently was talking about West Pakistanis living in East Pakistan.

Other refugees reported that some Bengalis had taken vengeance by killing nonBengali businessmen.


The foreigners said that 7 P.M.‐to‐5 A.M. curfew prevails in Chittagong, that electric power, cut for three days, has been restored only in some areas of the city, and that the port was virtually shut down since there were no Bengalis to work there.

Some of the evacuees left their homes during the heavy fighting and took refuge in the Hotel Agrabad, away from the center of the action.

They said that soldiers had visited some of their homes while they were away.

“The army was very polite,” Edward J. McManus, an American engineer from Montrose, N. Y., said with sarcasm. “They drank all my whisky, but they gave me all my glasses back. Very honest."
 
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economic Havoc Worsens Impact of Pakistan's War
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
APRIL 15, 1971

AGARTALA, India, April 13— Peasants in many areas of East Pakistan are not planting their rice because the daily shooting between the Pakistani Army and the Bengali independence forces has made them afraid to come out in the open.

In West Pakistan, 1,000 miles away across Indian territory, textile mills are turning out cheap cotton‐goods that have no market other than East Pakistan; but cannot be sold there unless the Pakistani Army crushes the independence movement and ends the war.

These are but marks of the havoc that the three‐week war has created in the economies of both wings of the country, beyond the loss of life in the East.

Although this correspondent saw no outright starvation in East Pakistan, food stocks in the countryside are low and famine seems a possibility in some areas.

Even in normal times, East Pakistan might be called a hunger area, for it has an annual food‐grain deficit of 2.5 million tons.

No Reports From Delta

With foreign newsmen barred by the Pakistani Government from entering East Pakistan, no reports are available from some of the heavily populated islands in East Pakistan's delta on the Bay of Bengal. Several hundred thousand were killed in the delta in November by a cyclone that also destroyed most of last year's rice crop there.

Approximately two million survivors have been living ever since on relief supplies. The political crisis that erupted early in March and the Army attack on the civilian population after that have halted all shipments of food to the cyclone‐affected area.

Foreign diplomats and others fear that the food problem there could become grave in a few weeks, with the coming of the monsoon rains, which each year cut off some of the islands from the rest of the country for nearly five months.

Beyond that, it is estimated that 100,000 cyclone survivors are still without homes or shelter. In the monsoon, they will face desperate conditions.

Disruptions Compounded

War disruptions are compounding the economic crises. The Pakistani armed forces, composed entirely of West Pakistani troops, are destroying food stocks, tea plantations and jute mills. The resistance troops, adopting guerrilla tactics, are tearing up rail lines, blowing up bridges and demolishing roads to restrict the army's movements and cut its supply routes.

Tea‐estate and jute‐mill managers, mostly foreigners, are abandoning their plantations, leaving them in the hands of Bengali assistants.

There is no money to pay the thousands of tea workers left behind and work has stopped on almost all plantations, most of them in Sylhet district in the northeast. The tea workers are all Hindus and, according to the managers who fled, they have already begun migrating across the border to predominantly Hindu India.

The Pakistani Army has reportedly looted banks and shops.

“Their targets are mostly civilian,” said Col. M.A.G. Osmani (Muhammad Ataul Ghani Osmani), the commander of the resistance forces, at this base in an eastern border area.

“They are trying to terrorize and starve the population.”


There are shortages of salt, lentils, mustard oil for cooking, kerosene for lamps and fuel for machines such as those that run village flour mills.

Rice and fish are the staple foods of the Bengalis—the 75 million people of East Pakistan —but with rice stocks dwindling, they are turning to jackfruit as a new staple. Jackfruit, which can be cooked as a vegetable before it is ripe or eaten as a fruit when it matures, grows plentifully on trees everywhere in East Pakistan, but, it has always been a minor part of the Bengali diet.

With nothing moving through East Pakistan's major port, Chittagong, except for the army's military supplies, the Bengalis for now will have to survive on what they can scratch from their own countryside. After centuries of floods, storms, disease and the deepest poverty, they have become experts at survival.

Though the war has not touched West Pakistan physically, nearly every economic dislocation it has caused in the, East will have an impact in the West.

Jute from the East was the country's largest single export product and foreign‐exchange earner. Most of the foreign earnings were spent in West Pakistan—to pay for the army and to finance big industries and public works.


Exploitation Goes On

This kind of exploitation of East Pakistan, which has been going on since the two parts of the country were carved out of the Indian subcontinent in 1947, was the fuel that fired first the East's drive for equal treatment and regional autonomy and finally the movement for independence.

With the East's jute mills shut, West Pakistan's economy is in difficulty.

East Pakistan has always been the major market for West Pakistani manufactured goods, particularly cotton materials’ for clothing, and now this trade has stopped.

The cotton is of such cheap quality that it has no market anywhere in the world; it was sold in the East at a Government‐fixed inflated price to support the West's textile industry.


With imposition of censorship on all news reports from West Pakistan, it is difficult to tell what stresses the economy there is showing.

How long the Pakistani Government can wage its war against the independence forces in East Pakistan is unsure. The main factors include the following:

¶How much reserve ammunition the Government has. During Pakistan's brief war with India in 1965, her lack of a large ammunition stockpile was a major factor.

¶How much airplane and vehicle fuel the Government has, and how much foreign exchange is on hand to buy fuel.

¶Whether the United States and others in the aid‐Pakistan consortium go so far as to, halt all aid to press the Pakistani Government to end its military offensive in the East. United States economic assistance alone is about 817.5‐million a year.

¶Whether Communist China — Pakistan's closest ally now — agrees to provide everything Pakistan needs to continue the war.

The United States has given an implied warning to Pakistan about withdrawing aid. But Washington's desire seems to be to try to bring about an end to the war without taking any drastic action.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours of Terror for a Trapped Bengali Officer
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
APRIL 17, 1971

AGARTALA India April 13 —On the night of March 25 Dabir recalls, he and the two other East Pakistani officers in the 53rd Field Artillery Regiment were standing outside when they heard their commander tell the West Pakistani officers he had summoned to his office:

“All of you go now to the city, and by morning I want to see the whole of Comilla filled with corpses. If any officer hesitates to do so I'll have no mercy on him.”

Late in the afternoon of March 30 Dabir says after five days of house arrest for himself and the two other Bengali officers the West Pakistanis sent an officer to their room to execute them—but Dabir wounded, escaped by feigning death.

He has now joined the forces fighting for the independence of Bangla Desh or Bengal Nation as the Bengali population has named East Pakistan.

Killing Their Comrades

Dabir's experience was apparently no exception. All over East Pakistan—according to Western evacuees and Bengali soldiers and refugees — West Pakistanis who dominate the armed forces were killing their East Pakistani comrades in uniform to deny the independence movement a cadre of military leaders. The sources report that the families of many Bengali officers were also rounded up and killed.

The breakdown of the code of the soldier—officers and troops killing men with whom they had fought—perhaps depicts as well as any other facet of this conflict the depth of the racial hatred felt by the West Pakistanis, who are Punjabis and Pathans, for the 75 million Bengalis of East Pakistan.


The killing of Bengali soldiers began on the night that the army launched its effort to try to crush the independence movement.

Dabir - a slightly built second lieutenant who is 20 years old and unmarried, told his story of that night and the days that followed to this correspondent at a post in the eastern sector of East Pakistan.

Dabir is not his real name, he asked that a pseudonym be used on the chance that some members of his family —his parents, a brother and three sisters—might still be alive.

Given Office Duties

Talking in a soft almost unemotional voice he gave this account:

After the West Pakistani officers left the commander's office and headed for the armory to get their weapons the three unarmed Bengali officers were called in and placed under what amounted to house arrest although the commander said they were being given office duties.

That night, which they were made to spend in the room next to the commander's, Dabir could not sleep. At 1 A.M. seven or eight shots were fired somewhere in the compound.

During the next three days as Dabir and the two others both captains, answered telephones and shuffled papers under the watch of sentries they heard the sounds of machine‐gun small‐arms and artillery fire in the distance.

Through a window they saw the 60 Bengali soldiers of the regiment being taken off behind a building, their hands in the air, by West Pakistani troops. Then the three heard a sustained burst of firing and assumed that the Bengalis had been killed.

All pretense was dropped on March 29 and the three officers were locked in room together. They passed the night in fear.

On the afternoon of the 30th a West Pakistani officer walked up to the door and broke the glass with the barrel of a submachine gun.

One Bengali captain fell to his knees and begged for mercy. The answer was a burst of fire. The West Pakistani then fired a second burst into the other captain.

Dabir pressed himself against the wall next to the door. The West Pakistani tried the locked door cursed and went away for the key.

Dabir threw himself under his cot and covered his head with his hands. The man returned. “I shrieked,” Dabir said. “He fired. I felt a bullet hit me. I made noise as if I was dying. He stopped firing thinking was dead, and went away.”

Poked and Prodded

One bullet had struck Dabir's right wrist another had grazed his cheek and a third had ripped his shirt up the back. He rubbed blood from his wrist over his face and held his breath when other officers returned to make sure all three were dead.

The West Pakistanis poked and prodded until they were satisfied. For the next two and a half hours soldiers kept coming into the room to view the spectacle. A Punjabi sergeant kicked the bodies of the two captains Each time Dabir desperately held his breath.

“Time passed,” Dabir continued. “The blood dried and flies gathered on my wound. The smell was bad.”

After seven hours Dabir left by the window and dropped four feet to the ground. A sentry heard him and began firing, but it was dark and the shots went wild. Other soldiers in the compound also opened fire, but Dabir made it past the last sentry post, crawled through a rice paddy, swam across a small river and escaped. The next day a country doctor removed the bullet from his wrist and bandaged him.

Dabir looks like a boy—he weighs only 120 pounds—but his manner leaves no doubt that he is fully grown now only three months after graduating fourth in his class from the military academy at Kakul in West Pakistan.

His hatred for the West Pakistanis is intense but controlled. “Without any reason they have killed us.” he said. “They have compelled us to stand against them.”

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan: In This Case ‘War Is Hell’ For One Side Only
— SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
APRIL 18, 1971

AGARTALA, East Pakistan—War is hell, everyone says, but it is usually hell for both sides.

Yet, in the three‐week‐old war between the Pakistani Army and the outgunned resistance fighters of East Pakistan, there has been only one hell so far—that of the tens of thousands of East Pakistani civilians who have been massacred by the army in its drive to terrorize, intimidate and crush the Bengali independence movement.

Having gained control of most of the major cities and towns, the army troops—all are West Pakistanis, many of whom harbor deep racial hatred for the Bengali population of East Pakistan—are now making forays into the countryside. They hope to extend their control before the monsoon rains become heavy in a few weeks and make movement for a regular army difficult.

“They flounder and die in knee‐deep water,” said a Bengali officer. “We will use country boats. We will make misery for them.”

The prospect is for a long, sullen war. Most diplomats and foreign observers believe that the Bengalis, by hanging on, will eventually make life untenable for the West Pakistanis, who are more than 1,000 miles from their home and their supply bases.

But these observers also agree that, unless foreign powers put an economic, squeeze on the Pakistani Government, it could be years before the 75 million Bengalis finally win their freedom and end West Pakistan's exploitation of their province— the exploitation that gave birth to the independence movement.

There are usually two sides to every story, every argument, every conflict. But it is difficult, after witnessing what is taking place in East Pakistan, to imagine some justification for the army's action. This is because the army, from all the available evidence, has set out to kill the leaders and potential leaders of East Pakistan and to destroy the economic base of the region.

“They want to drag us so far down that we will be reduced to eating grass,” said one Bengali soldier. “They want to make sure that no head will ever be raised against them again.”

The West Pakistani troops are killing Bengali students, intellectuals, professors, army officers, engineers, doctors and others of any leadership potential.

Using tanks, jet fighter‐bombers, heavy artillery and gun boats, all mostly supplied by the United States, the Soviet Union and Communist China, the Pakistani Army is also destroying food‐storage houses, tea factories, jute mills and natural gas fields—the economic infrastructure of East Pakistan.

Shoeless Soldiers

The largest weapon the resistance army has is the three inch mortar, although it has captured a few heavy guns. Some of the Bengali soldiers have no shoes.

The Bengalis — their core of trained troops number only 12,000 to 15,000, all of whom fled the ranks of the Pakistan Army when the attack began cannot afford frontal clashes with the estimated 60,000 to 80,000 West Pakistani troops in East Pakistan. So the Bengali strategy is now based on hit‐and‐run guerrilla tactics.

The independence movement has formed a provisional government, but for the moment this Is largely a move to keep Bengali morale from flagging and to try to coordinate the war effort.

As the war continues, the economies of both East and West Pakistan are suffering badly. Frightened Bengali peasants are not risking going into their open fields to plant rice this year, East Pakistan's jute is not being ex ported and West Pakistan's big textile industry is unable to sell the Bengalis its over‐priced sleazy cottons, for which there is no other market. The Bengali nationalists may be able to hold out by living off the familiar land. For West Pakistan, the key may be foreign aid.

One question mark is whether Communist China will provide enough aid to allow the Pakistanis to pursue their offensive indefinitely. In a note to the Pakistani Government last week, Premier Chou En‐lai denounced the United States, the Soviet Union and India for “carrying out gross interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan” and promised China's support “should the Indian expansionists dare to launch aggression against Pakistan.”

Another similar question is whether the Western aid‐giving community, particularly the United States, which is now giving Pakistan about $175‐million a year, will withhold all further assistance until President Yahya Khan stops the bloodshed.

The State Department's desire is to try to press for a political settlement, remote as that possibility is. This strategy runs the heavy risk not only of failing in West Pakistan, where the Americans want to keep a foothold to keep Chinese influence from becoming predominant, but also of losing all the East Pakistani goodwill it had in the strongly pro‐Western independence movements.

The Pakistan Government, often through its official radio, is accusing its old enemy India of virtually everything in this war: of sending arms and soldiers to the independence army, of harassing Pakistani ships, of setting up a clandestine radio station, of inspiring the Indian press to print exaggerated accounts of massacres and atrocities. These charges, all of which India has repeatedly denied, have received wide play in the world press, mainly because there is no Bangla Desh radio to counter balance them.

India is probably providing assistance to the independence movement, but there has been no evidence yet of any arms, ammunition or men.

Radio Pakistan and the controlled West Pakistan press, in addition to using India for a whipping boy, also continues to issue daily reports describing conditions in East Pakistan as “returning to normal.” It characterizes the popularly supported independence movement as “a handful of miscreants” and says that the East Pakistan economy is on the mend, with jute being exported again. All are bald fabrications.
 
.
West Pakistan Pursues Subjugation of Bengalis
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
JULY 14, 1971

NEW DELHI, July 13—Army trucks roll through the half‐deserted streets of the capital of East Pakistan these days, carrying “antistate” prisoners to work‐sites for hard

The following dispatch was written by a correspondent of The New York Times who was expelled from East Pakistan on June 30 following a tour of the area.labor. Their heads are shaved and they wear no shoes and no clothes except for shorts —all making escape difficult.

Every day at the airport at Dacca, the capital, planes from West Pakistan, over a thousand miles across India, disgorge troops dressed in baggy pajama like tribal garb to appear less conspicuous.

Street designations are being changed to remove all Hindu names as well as those of Bengali Moslem nationalists as part of a campaign to stamp out Bengali culture. Shankari Bazar Road in Dacca is now Tikka Khan Road, after the lieutenant general who is the martial‐law governor of East, Pakistan and whom most Bengalis call “the Butcher.”

Economy Viewed as Crippled

Those are but a few of the countless evidences, seen by this correspondent during a recent visit to the eastern province, that Pakistan's military regime is determined to make its occupation stick and to subjugate the region of 75 million people. The West Pakistanis are doing so despite a crippled economy, the collapse of governmental administration, widening guerrilla activity by the Bengali separatists, mounting army casualties and an alienated, sullen population.

To insure troop strength in East Pakistan, the Government has leased two Boeing 707's for a year from a private Irish owned charter airline, World Airways, to carry reinforcements for an army put at 70, 000 to 80,000 men and replacements for casualties.

In addition to the daily troops arrivals, the Government is bringing in wave upon wave of West Pakistanis to replace East Pakistanis in Government jobs. No Bengali is trusted with a responsible or sensitive post; even the man who cuts the grass at the Dacca airport is a non‐Bengali.

Few Bengali taxi drivers re main. Their jobs have been given to non‐Bengali Moslem migrants from India such as the Biharis, who have identified and sided with the West Pakistani dominated Government land who are serving as the army's civilian arm, informing and enforcing.

The West Pakistanis are discouraging the use of the Bengali language, and trying to replace it with their own, Urdu. Soldiers tell the Bengalis disdainfully that theirs is not really a civilized tongue and that they should start teaching their children Urdu if they want to get along. Merchants, out of fear, have replaced their signs with signs in English be cause they don't know Urdu.

‘Peace Committees’ Formed

Throughout East Pakistan the Army is training new para military home guards or simply arming “loyal” civilians, some of whom are formed into peace committees. Besides Biharis and other non‐Bengali, Urdu speaking Moslems, the recruits include the small minority of Bengali Moslems who have long supported the army—adherents of the right‐wing religious parties such as the Moslem League and Jamaat‐e-Islami.

In the election last December those parties failed to win a single seat for East Pakistan in the National Assembly.

In a sense the election spawned the crisis, for the Awami League, an East Pakistani party campaigning for more self‐rule for the province, unexpectedly won a national majority. With the previously suppressed Bengalis about to assume a strong national role, the leading political group of West Pakistan, the Pakistan People's party, refused to attend the coming session of the National Assembly, which was to have written a new constitution to restore civilian rule. President Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan responded by postponing the session, set for March 3.

Negotiations and Attack

Protests and rioting erupted in East Pakistan, and the Bengalis answered the Awami League's call for a noncooperation movement in defiance of the military.

The President flew to Dacca to negotiate with the Awami League leader, Sheik Mujibur Rahman. During their negotiations, on the night of March 25, the army launched a surprise attack on the largely unarmed civilian population to try to crush the autonomy movement. The league was banned and Sheik Mujib jailed as a traitor.

The initial Bengali resistance —led by men in the police and national army Who had switched allegiance was quickly routed, but it is now emerging from its Indian‐border sanctuaries, with new recruits and supplies, to wage Vietnam‐style guerrilla warfare —and cause increasing torment to the army.

Since the offensive began the troops have killed countless thousands of Bengalis—foreign diplomats estimate at least 200,000 to 250,000 — many in massacres. Although the targets were Bengali Moslems and the 10 million Hindus at first, the army, is now concentrating on Hindus in what foreign observers characterize as a holy war.

The West Pakistani leaders have long, considered the Hindus as subverters of Islam and they now view them as agents of India, which, has been accused of engineering the autonomy movement to force Pakistan's disintegration.

Of the more than six million Bengalis who are believed to have fled to India to escape the army's terror, at least four million are Hindus. The troops are still killing Hindus and burning and looting their villages.

West Pakistani officials insist, however, ‘that normalcy is returning and have appealed to the Hindus to “return to their homes and hearths,” assuring them that they have nothing, to fear. Only a handful of refugees have returned and the reception centers the Government has erected to show foreign visitors remain largely deserted.

Seeking Restoration of Aid

Army commanders recently spread the word that low‐caste Hindus were welcome to return to their homes. Observers view the gesture cynically, pointing out that without the low‐caste Hindus—menial laborers, sweepers and washer men—the army has no one to do its dirty work.

Apart from the refugees in India, there are in East Pakistan millions of displaced Bengalis who fled their homes when the army came and are still afraid to return.

Recently there have been signs that the troops have been ordered to carry out their operations more subtly and less in the public eye. The orders, ac cording to foreign diplomats, are inspired by Pakistan's desire to persuade an 11‐nation consortium to resume economic aid,
temporarily suspended in censure of the army repression:

[A special mission of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which coordinates the aid program, has reported that the ravages by the military in East Pakistan will require that development efforts be suspended for at least a year. The mission made a widespread survey of the province in May and June.)

Diplomats in Dacca attribute Pakistan's decision to allow foreigners to travel freely through East Pakistan and to readmit
foreign newsmen — who had been barred since the offensive began except as participants in Government‐guided tours — as part of the campaign to restore the aid.

Nonetheless the killing, though it is more selective and less wholesale, has not stopped and the outlook, most observers believe, is for a long and bloody struggle.

Bengalis Pass the Word

Foreign missionaries, who are posted even, in the remotest parts of East Pakistan, report new massacres almost daily. One missionary said that the army recently, killed over 1,000 Hindus in a day in a section of Barisal District, in the south.

Another reported that in Sylhet District, in the northeast; a “peace committee” called a meeting of all the residents of one area, ostensibly to work out a reconciliation. When everyone had gathered troops ar rived, picked out the 300 Hindus in the crowd, led them away and shot them.

Whenever a, Bengali talks to a foreigner in public he is running a risk. At ferry crossings Bengalis sidled up to this cor respondent's car to whisper a few scraps Of information about army terror or, with a quick smile, about a raid by the guerrillas of the liberation army.

As soon as six or seven people gathered a West Pakistani soldier or policeman would saunter over, glowering at the Bengalis, and they would melt away.

The presence of the army and its civilian informers notwithstanding, the Bengalis some how find a way to tell their stories to the foreign, visitor— by slipping notes into his car or arranging clandestine meeting.

At one Such meeting in a town not fat from Dacca, a merchant related that a soldier arrested him one day for no reason, Confiscated his money and watch and took him, to the police station, where he was jailed for a night before being—
miraculously, he felt—released.’

The merchant said he had spent the night praying and reading the messages that Covered the walls of his cell— scrawled there by previous prisoners. The messages, he said, were nearly all alike, giving the name and address of the, prisoner and the date of his arrest and saying: “I may not live. Please tell my family what happened to me.”

Not one of them has been heard from since, the merchant added.

Property Damage Heavy

The killings have been matched by the property dam age the army has inflicted everywhere. In the countryside —for miles at a stretch some times — have been burned to the ground on both sides of the road. In the cities and towns large areas have been reduced to rubble by heavy gunfire.

The Bengalis say the troops were simply bent on wanton destruction. The army says that it never fired unless fired upon, but field commanders beast that in most towns there was little or no resistance.

Why all the, devastation? they are asked. It was all done by “miscreants,” is the stock answer.

Though some Bengalis are trickling back, to
population centers, Most towns, still have only half or less of their original numbers, and parts of some areas, like the northwest region, are virtually deserted.

Fields of untended rice are choked with weeds. On jute plots where, dozens of farm, laborers once toiled only a few bent backs can be seen. East Pakistan's jute, the tough fiber for gunny sacks, is the main stay of the national economy, being the biggest single export and earner of foreign exchange. All signs indicate that the com ing crop will be a poor one.

Even if the crop were good, the jute factories, with much of their skilled labor gone, could not handle it. They are operating far below capacity.

River Traffic Harassed

The insurgents continue to harass river traffic, trying to disrupt military movements and prevent harvested jute from reaching the
factories. They have already sunk several jute barges in the Jessore Khulna region, a rich jute area.

The East Pakistani tea industry has been even more badly crippled, and the Government has reportedly had to order two million pounds from foreign sources for West Pakistani con sumers.

West Pakistan's economy is one of the roots of the blood shed. Another is the wide ethnic gap between the light skinned, Middle Eastern Punjabis who dominate in the western wing and the dark‐skinned, Southeast Asian Bengalis of the east. Except for their common, religion, Islam, the two peoples are as different as can be.

From Pakistan's formation 21 years ago, the more prosperous western wing with a minority (55 million) of the population, was, looked down on and exploited the poorer Bengali majority. The Bengalis grew bitter as they watched the foreign
exchange earned in the east go to pay for the West. Pakistani dominated.army and build the industries and development projects of the west.

Even the few development projects in East Pakistan have been halted now because of the terror, insecurity and lack of civilian administration in the countryside.

Resistance Seems to Grow

Nevertheless, the military, by rounding up laborers, has finally gotten the key ports of Chittagong and Chalna functioning again at a reasonably effective level, but there are goods—to load onto outgoing ships except what was in ware houses before the fighting.

Food shortages are becoming serious in some areas and experts predict that the situation, could reach famine proportions unless the army can restore the disrupted transport system and distribute available food.

Such restoration does not seem likely because the Bengali resistance, though still disorganized, appears to be gathering momentum—with increasing assistance and sanctuary, and sometimes covering fire, from India.

Thousands of young Bengalis are being trained in demolition and guerrilla tactics—often on the Indian side of the border, with India providing many of the instructors. The first elements of the new guerrillas are beginning to flow back into East Pakistan.

More and more road and rail way bridges are being blown tip and electrical power supplies knocked out. Some of the, demolition work has been expert. Road mines are becoming common. Often the army, which is on combat alert, cannot get cal contractors to repair the damage, so it uses forced labor, with meager results.

Outside Comilla, not long ago the guerrillas blew a rail bridge. A repair train was sent out with army guards. The guerrillas attacked the repair train in broad daylight, the fireman and taking a hostage. The train sped back into town.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Kennedy, in India, Terms Pakistani Drive Genocide

By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
AUG. 17, 1971

NEW DELHI, Aug. 16—Senator Edward M. Kennedy today denounced Pakistan's military action against the East Pakistani separatists as genocide And said that the secret trial of the East Pakistani leader, Sheik Mujibur Rahman, was “an outrage to every concept of international law.”

At a news conference here as he ended his week‐long visit to India, the Massachusetts Democrat blamed the Nixon Administration's policy of continued arms aid to Pakistan for the severe damage to United States relations with India.

Mr. Kennedy—who spent most of his time here visiting the squalid border camps that hold East Pakistani refugees, seven million of whom are said to have fled—said President Nixon's policy “baffles me and after seeing the results in terms of human misery, I think it's an even greater disaster.”

Discussing the 20‐year Soviet‐ Indian friendship treaty signed here a week ago, the Senator said he saw nothing inconsistent with India's stated policy of nonalignment and did not think it was “in any way disadvantageous to U.S. friendship with India.”’

As a matter of fact, he added, the Indian Foreign Minister, Swaran Singh, had indicated that he was willing to sign similar treaty with the United States.

He Has No Solution to Offer

The Soviet‐Indian treaty, whose immediate aim is to discourage Pakistan from declaring war on India, which she has threatened, provides that if the Soviet Union or India is attacked or threatened, the two countries shall hold “consultations to remove such threat and to take appropriate effective measures to insure peace and the security of their Countries.”

Senator Kennedy, who came to India in his capacity as chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on refugees, said he believed that a political solution to the East Pakistan crisis was possible but that he did not pretend to have it.

The crisis erupted on March 25, when the Pakistani army, composed of West Pakistanis, launched a surprise offensive to try to crush the Bengali independence movement in East Pakistan. Diplomatic observers estimate that the army has killed at least 200,000 Bengalis. Frightened refugees continue to pour into India by the thousands.

The Bengali insurgents, “with the help of Indian arms, training and sanctuary,” have increased their guerrilla activities, causing a significant number of army casualties.

President Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan of Pakistan has repeatedly warned that if India continues to help the guerrillas, he will declare war.

The Senator seemed uneasy only when pressed by Indian newsmen for his idea of a political solution. The official view here is that the only solution is independence for East Pakistan under Sheik Mujib, who faces the death penalty.

“The only crime that Mujib is guilty of,” the Senator said, “is winning an election.”

Mr. Kennedy had planned to visit both East and West Pakistan and had obtained a Pakistani visa, but when he arrived in India last Tuesday, the Pakistani Government canceled his visit, saying that it would serve no useful purpose because “the partisan statements he made on arrival in India showed how deeply he imbibed Indian propaganda:”

Describing the financial burden of the refugees on India as overwhelming, he said: “I think it will be $500‐million to $1‐billion a year. Obviously, the international response has been meager to date. I'm pleased the United States has given more than all the aid put together from other nations, but compared to the magnitude of the burden, it's extremely inadequate.”

When he gets home, he said, he will urge an end to economic aid to Pakistan “until a political solution has been realized.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
.
Though the war has not touched West Pakistan physically, nearly every economic dislocation it has caused in the, East will have an impact in the West.

Jute from the East was the country's largest single export product and foreign‐exchange earner. Most of the foreign earnings were spent in West Pakistan—to pay for the army and to finance big industries and public works.


With the East's jute mills shut, West Pakistan's economy is in difficulty.

East Pakistan has always been the major market for West Pakistani manufactured goods, particularly cotton materials’ for clothing, and now this trade has stopped.

The cotton is of such cheap quality that it has no market anywhere in the world; it was sold in the East at a Government‐fixed inflated price to support the West's textile industry.
Now Pakistanis lie to their teeth that any of these facts are true. I would say Pakistan's current economic mess has much to do with their addiction for easy money paying someone else. When their main cash cow East Pakistan was gone, Bhutto regime started heavy borrowing from IMF, World Bank and Arab brothers to fund the military and maintain same spending habit like before when East Pakistan was paying the bill. Later Pakistani rulers could not break free of this culture to maintain public satisfaction. The accumulated result is now open to see by all.
 
.
Now Pakistanis lie to their teeth that any of these facts are true. I would say Pakistan's current economic mess has much to do with their addiction for easy money paying someone else. When their main cash cow East Pakistan was gone, Bhutto regime started heavy borrowing from IMF, World Bank and Arab brothers to fund the military and maintain same spending habit like before when East Pakistan was paying the bill. Later Pakistani rulers could not break free of this culture to maintain public satisfaction. The accumulated result is now open to see by all.

Well Bhutto was hanged by Zia-Ul Haque, then ZH himself got assassinated by way of military transport. But let's not get into Pakistan's issues post-1971. I will agree with you that the same issues that plagued West Pakistan pre-1971 also continued past 1971, the actors changed but the story-line remained the same. I believe we should be less concerned with post 1971 issues as we are not part of that equation any longer.

Pakistanis are the sole arbiter and decider on how they run their country, which I can say for sure has taken a radically different (pun intended) path compared to Bangladesh for one reason or another. And they will be the gainers or sufferers for the consequences, for better or worse. That is the choice they have made consciously as a national entity.

Let's just leave it at that.
 
.
A Pakistani Terms Bengalis 'Chicken‐Hearted’
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
JULY 17, 1971

FARIDPUR, Pakistan, June 29—Maj. Nazir Baig, the martial‐law commander in the Faridpur District just west of Dacca, is a chunkily built Baluchi tribesman from West Pakistan who has spent nearly six of his 20 years of military service in East Pakistan.

The following dispatch was written by a correspondent of The New York Times who was expelled from East Pakistan on June 30.

His contempt for the Bengalis of this eastern wing of the country is not only common but also proudly held in the Pakistani Army, which began its military campaign to crush their movement for provincial autonomy on March 25.

The Bengalis, he said in an interview, are a “chicken‐hearted people” who “never miss a chance to stab you in the back.”

Major Eager to Talk

The Bengali Hindus, a minority in this heavily Moslem province of 75 million people, are the worst, according to the major, because they have been “sucking the blood” out of East Pakistan and sending their money to India, Pakistan's Hindu enemy.

During a recent week of traveling through East Pakistan, it was evident that, although many army officers were less articulate than Major Baig, they shared his opinions.

The interview with the major —held in a building that once was the headquarters of the popularly supported Awami League party which campaigned for autonomy and is now banned—lasted more than two hours. He was eager to talk, to try to convince a foreigner of the correctness of his views. He was often fervent.

He said that his troops had met no resistance when they entered Faridpur, “not a single bullet,” and he explained the destruction in the town and the killing of townspeople by saying it was all done by miscreants—the word used by the Pakistani Government to describe the Bengali insurgents.

Major Baig denied what frightened townspeople whispered to a visitor—that the killing and destruction were entirely the army's work.

Only an 'Odd Pinprick’

Our men are properly motivated,” he said. “They have been told they were brought here to help another Moslem brother in trouble. There was no case of rape or looting or any antisocial activity. Islam as a religion forbids this kind of thing. This is a Moslem country where they have come, not a foreign land.”

Asked if there was any resistance in the area now, he said: “Nothing except for an odd pinprick”. This disappoint ed him as a professional soldier, he said.

“The Bengalis,” he went on, are very, very soft and chicken‐hearted people. The sound of just one bullet sends hundreds of these people flying like chickens. They have no guts.”


He added, “They are lambs in front of you, tigers behind your back. They are a people who never miss a chance to stab you in the back.”

The major said, after a pause, that maybe his assessment did not apply to “100 per cent” of the people, ‘the common man here,’ he said, “is very simple and has very limited needs and is not very troublesome.”

Pressed about why so many Hindus were killed, the major again denied that his soldiers were responsible. Then he added: “Out of such a large population, if a few innocent people suffer in such abnormal conditions, is it not natural?”

Major Baig said that the Hindus had dominated the teaching profession in East Pakistan and had subverted the province by teaching un‐Islamic concepts. “This rot has happened now in East Pakistan because of this,” he said. “These teachers and all the Hindus have not accepted Pakistan as a reality. They live in a dream land. They believe that Mother India will be united again.” The major was confident, however, that India would never be able to swallow Pakistan.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bengali Refugees Say Soldiers Continue to Kill, Loot and Burn
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
SEPT. 23, 1971

KUTIBARI, India, Sept. 21—The latest refugees from East Pakistan report that the Pakistani Army and its civilian collaborators are continuing to kill, loot and burn despite the central Government's public avowals that it is bent on restoring normalcy and winning the confidence of the Bengali people.

The dozens of refugees interviewed by this correspondent today, all of whom fled into India from East Pakistan in the past week, describe the killing of civilians, rape and other acts of repression by the soldiers, most of them West Pakistanis.

As the refugees talked in their overcrowded, half‐flooded camps in and around this Indian village about four miles from the border and 60 miles northeast of Calcutta, the sound of shelling could be heard from the frontier. It was impossible to tell whether the shells came from the Pakistani) Army, the Indian border forces or the so‐called liberation forces of Bangla Desh (Bengal Nation), the name the Bengali separatist movement has given to East Pakistan since the attempt to repress the movement began in March.

Most of the refugees interviewed came from the region of Faridpur, the family home of Sheik Mujibur Rahman, jailed leader of the Bengalis.

Nearly All Are Hindus

The refugees said that although general living conditions were very difficult in East Pakistan, they would have stayed had it not been for the killings. Nearly all the latest arrivals are Hindus, who said that the military regime was still making the Hindu minority its particular target.

They said the guerrillas were active in their areas and that the army carried out massive reprisals against civilians after every guerrilla raid.

Nira Pada Saha, a jute trader in Faridpur District, told of reprisal against a village near his that had sheltered and fed the guerrillas. Just before he fled five days ago, he related, the army struck the village, first shelling it and then burning the huts.

“Some of the villagers didn't run away fast enough,” he said. “The soldiers caught them, tied their hands and feet and threw them into the flames.”

There were about 5,000 people in the village, most of them Hindus, Mr. Saha said, and not a hut is left intact.

Others be ‘Dirty Work’

According to the refugees, the army leaves much of the “dirty work” to its civilian collaborators—the razakars, or home guards—it has armed and to the supporters of right-wing religious political parties such as the Moslem League and Jamaat‐i‐Islami, which have usually backed the military regime.

The collaborators act as intelligence agents and enforcers for the army, the refugees say, by pointing out homes and villages and people who have helped the guerrillas. Often, the refugees added, the collaborators make arrests at random and for no reason.

“The razakars and the others come into a village and pick just any house,” said Dipak Kumar Biswas, a radio repairman from Barisal District. “Then they arrest whatever able-bodied young man is in that house and hand him over to the army. We don't know what the army does to them. They never come back.”

The refugees said that despite reprisals and police‐state activities, local people were continuing to provide food, shelter and information to the guerrillas.

Makhan Lal Talukdar, a rice farmer, said he fled a few days ago after some razakars swooped down on the crowd gathered at the weekly bazaar and opened fire. Six people were killed, he said, and many wounded.

Refugee Flow Goes On

Mr. Talukdar crossed into India with his family of eight but had to leave his father behind in hiding because he was too old to make the trek.

About 15,000 people from his area fled to India after the bazaar incident, Mr. Talukdar said. Some 20,000 to 30,000 refugees pour into India every day, joining the millions — the latest estimate is 8.6 million—already here.

The Pakistani President, Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan, has urged the refugees to return, promising them assistance, and he has offered amnesty to the guerrillas.

The promises only evoke bitter laughter from the refugees. “We fled to save our lives,” said Rajendra Das, another farmer. “They are still killing us. We will not go back until there is complete independence.”

Though rice is somewhat short in the refugees’ areas, with the price up 40 per cent as a result, other foods are said to be plentiful. However, many people are going hungry, the refugees said, because they lack money and jobs.

Economic life has been badly disrupted since the army began its assault. Particularly hard hit have been the farm laborers and those who do menial labor on Government public‐works projects, most of which have been halted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bengal; Breaking Point Is Near — And it May Mean War
SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
OCT. 10, 1971

CALCUTTA — When the Bengalis of East Pakistan began crossing the border into India six months ago in flight from civil war, they were greeted by the Bengalis of India with sympathy and tolerance despite the disruptions created by the refugee flood. But life is a survival affair in this corner of the world and magnanimity a luxury that few can afford for long.

Last week, with the refugee population swollen to 9 million, West Bengal, the Indian state on the East Pakistani border, was in an explosive condition. Across the border, the Pakistani Army was still killing and burning in an effort to crush the East Bengal independence movement — and still sending refugees pouring into India at a rate of 30,000 a day or 1 million a month. In West Bengal, tensions were festering both inside and outside the refugee camps. And the temptation to get rid of the crushing refugee burden by intervening in the fighting across the border —even if that meant another war with Pakistan — was growing for Indians all the way up to the Government in New Delhi.

In the beginning, when there were only 1 or 2‐million refugees, the Government of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, although Strained by the relief effort, exhibited no sense of crisis. In fact, the refugees were a political asset that India could use in denouncing Pakistan's military repression and expressing New Delhi's sympathy for the independence of Bangla Desh, or Bengal Nation, the name the Bengali separatists have given to East Pakistan.

But now the relief program is cracking at the seams. The refugees are complaining that they are not getting their full rations; some have accused camp officials of black‐marketing relief supplies. Angry local people are protesting that the refugees are getting more food free than they can afford to buy on their meager wages as field hands and construction laborers. Refugee pressures have pushed local food prices up, and surplus refugee labor has driven local wage rates down. Firewood for cooking is scarce, and refugees have been caught stripping wood off fruit trees in local orchards.

Several clashes, and even some near‐riots, have erupted; some refugees have been killed either by the police or, local people. Marxist and Maoist political groups are trying to exploit these tensions to foment even wider trouble. Indian officials have hired several thousand young men to, try to curb extremist agitation in and around the camps.

What the Indians fear most is that the tension might take on a communal color — most of the East Pakistani refugees are Hindus terrorized by the Moslem. West Pakistani Army—and touch off a nationwide chain reaction in which India's majority Hindus would take revenge on the country's 60‐million Moslems.

The pressures are building in India to take some bold action that would stop the flood of refugees, a major threat to the country's already‐fragile social and economic fabric. Bangla Desh officials are pushing hard on New Delhi to give them the support needed for a major offensive. They are asking for sufficient heavy weapons and air cover, although not Indian troops.

In the United Nations General Assembly last week, the Pakistani delegate charged that India has in fact been carrying on, a clandestine war against Pakistan for the last few months. The charge bears some truth, for India has been giving sanctuary and arms to and training the Mukti Bahini (liberation forces) of Bangla Desh and has occasionally provided covering artillery and mortar fire for the Bengali guerrillas. With their hit‐and-run raids, the guerrillas have been able to keep East Pakistan in chaos and the Pakistani Army off balance. They have been severing roads and bridges, knocking out power installations and killing a significant number of Pakistani troops.

The Most dramatic of the guerrilla successes has been the damaging and sinking of ships in East Pakistan's two major harbors. The latest casualty was a Greek tanker, which Bengali frogmen damaged in Chittagong harbor about a week ago. Some shipping lines are thinking of halting all their traffic into East Pakistan. That would be a severe blow to the ability of the Pakistani Government to support its military occupation there.


Up to now, the Indians—themselves restrained from any rash move by their closest ally, the Soviet Union — have refused to help the guerrillas mount a major offensive that could seize a sizable chunk of East Pakistan territory and set up the Bangla Desh Government. But more and more people, including key Indian military officials, are shaking their heads gloomily and saying that unless the civil strife across the border is ended very soon by a political settlement, there may be no alternative to some kind of military action against East Pakistan.

Even if the Indians do not immediately sanction a full scale thrust to seize major territory, where at least some of the refugees could go back to live, reports here indicate that New Delhi is increasing its arms supply to the guerrillas and that there will be a sharp increase in guerrilla activity within a few weeks — “a big punch,” as one Bangla Desh official described it.

How far India is prepared to go eventually to support the guerrillas is not clear, Most observers here feel that India's ability and willingness to absorb the refugee pressure is not limitless — that there is a breaking point and that it could come soon.

No decision on that is likely to be made until Mrs. Gandhi returns from her major tour of Western capitals, including London and Washington, on which she embarks later this month.

The Prime Minister will be pressing for stronger Western support for India's position—that Pakistan's military regime must negotiate a settlement in East Pakistan with the Awami League, the autonomy‐minded party that won 160 of East Pakistan's 169 National Assembly seats (a national majority) in last December's elections and was outlawed when the Pakistan Army struck in March.

Mrs. Gandhi will also presumably be probing, subtly—particularly with the Nixon Administration—to find out what the Western reaction would be to major Indian military action.

If Mrs. Gandhi gets nothing but more urging of caution and restraint and comes home feeling that India is being abandoned or isolated, then caution and restraint may be the next casualties on this disturbed subcontinent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Guerrilla Step‐up Seen
By SYDNEY H. SCHANBERG
OCT. 13, 1971

CALCUTTA, India, Oct. 11— Under heavy security, several special freight trains carrying military supplies now arrive here every day. The arms are reported to be for the Bengali guerrillas who are fighting for East Pakistan's independence and who seem to be preparing to step up their activities against the Pakistani army.

On the guerrilla side, the crucial question is how far India is willing to go in support of the independence movement. So far the Indians have been providing sanctuary, training and a certain amount of arms.

The political leaders of the six-month‐old independence struggle, who are based in Calcutta, have been complaining that the Indians are not giving them enough arms to equip all their trained men.

Moreover, India, largely because of the restraining advice of her closest ally, the Soviet Union, has not granted de jure recognition to the government of Bangla Desh (Bengal Nation), the name given to East Pakistan by the independence movement. The thinking behind that restraint has been that recognition might precipitate a war with Pakistan.

The flow of heavily guarded freight trains into Calcutta indicates that India has agreed to give the guerrillas more arms, but it does not necessarily mean that she is prepared to give them what they really want—logistic support and air cover for a frontal push into East Pakistan to seize control of a chunk of territory.

Even though Indian troops would not be involved, such a move would clearly be regarded by Pakistan as an act of war.

Meanwhile, an air of suspense continues to grow between the Indian and Pakistani armies, on both the eastern and western borders of divided Pakistan. Reliable reports indicate that both sides have reinforced their troops on the always sensitive frontiers.

Troop Moves Observed

This correspondent has observed Indian troop movements along the border with East Pakistan. Near one border point, at Petrapole, Indian regulars were training with recoilless rifles, often used against tanks.

There are many rumors about the possibility of another Indian‐Pakistani war—a brief but bloody one was fought in 1965 —but there is no strong evidence that it is imminent, and the troop movements may be elaborate psychological warfare.

In recent days the Indian press has been full of reports of a Pakistani military build‐up, of civilian evacuation from some Pakistani border areas and of war hysteria and a hate-India campaign in Pakistan. Correspondingly, the Pakistani press has been heavy with reports of an Indian build‐up and of Indian border provocations such as shelling.

Furthermore, security has been tightened around the camps that hold the Bengali refugees, who have fled the Pakistani military repression in East Pakistan. Indian officials say that Pakistani agents have infiltrated the camps.

An Indian news agency, Press Trust of India, reported that the authorities had imposed a blackout and air‐raid measures at the extensive oil refineries and depots in Assam, an eastern border state.

Whether those pieces add up to anything, it would be logical, now that the annual monsoon rains and floods are just about over, for both the Pakistani Army and the Bengali guerrillas to increase their activities.

As for India, the social and economic pressures of the refugees are mounting. Official estimate that over nine million have poured across the border and that the influx continues at about 30,000 a day (the Pakistanis put the total at much less).

Is there a breaking point, the foreign diplomats are asking, point at which the Indians decide that the strains are so great that they must take direct military action to stop the refugee flow?

Whatever the two governments do, all reports here indicate that the guerrillas are about to open a stepped‐up offensive. They have already delivered some hard blows. They have severed—and kept severed —the main rail line, many key roads and innumerable bridges, and they constantly blow up crucial power installations. Since August guerrilla frogmen have been attacking ships in East Pakistan's harbors and have damaged or sunk at least a dozen. As a result British lines have suspended traffic to East Pakistan.

Guerrillas Claim Big Toll

The guerrillas claim the killing of 20,000 to 30,000 Pakistani soldiers; although that is considered an exaggeration, the casualties are believed to be considerable. No figures are available on guerrilla casualties.

There are estimated to be 80,000 Pakistani soldiers in East Pakistan, plus about 10,000 hastily trained non‐Bengali home guardsmen.

Estimates of the number of guerrillas range from 50,000 to 100,000, many thousands of them trained since the Pakistani Army launched its attack against the independence movement in March. The hard core of professionals consists of more than 15,000 men who defected from the East Pakistan Rifles, a paramilitary border patrol force, and the East Bengal Regiment, a regular army unit.


Many of the guerrilla training camps and base areas are on the Indian side of the border, but a growing number of Bengalis have been operating from areas in East Pakistan adjoining the border.

Some recruits are being trained as guerrillas and others as regulars. “We need both,” a high official said, “because the guerrillas can only hurt and weaken and soften. We need a force that can hold territory.
 
.
The Grim Fight for ‘Bangla Desh’: East Pakistan
OCT. 17, 1971

NEW DELHI—“If the Vietcong had been doing this well after six months, they would have considered it remarkably good start” The foreign, diplomat was talking about the Mukti Bahini (Liberation Forces), the Bengali insurgents who are fighting for the independence of East Pakistan, which they have named Bangla Desh (Bengali nation).

From a disorganized, confused band of freedom fighters that moved into action when the Pakistani Army struck in late March to try to crush the Bengali autonomy movement, the Mukti Bahini has become, if not a well‐oiled fighting machine, at least a reasonably coordinated and more than reasonably effective guerrilla force. India has helped with arms, training and sanctuary —and, clearly, without the Indian aid, the level of insurgent activity could never have reached its present pitch. But the men and the motivation are East Pakistani, and, it is doubtful whether the Bengali resistance could be totally crushed by the troops from West Pakistan.

An estimated 80,000 West Pakistani troops have been moved into East Pakistan, plus several thousand West Pakistani police. They have hastily trained about 10,000 non‐Bengali home guards Razakars.

Estimates of the of Mukti Bahini pitted against this force range from 50,000 to 100,000; foreign observers think the lower number is probably the more realistic. The hard core of professional soldiers, and some of these are not highly trained, consists of no more than 15,000—Bengalis who defected to the Bangla Desh movement from the East Pakistan Rifles, a para military border patrol force, and the East Bengal Regiment, a better‐trained regular army unit. In addition, an estimated 30,000 to 40,000 new recruits—mostly between the ages of 18 to 25 and mostly college students but including many village boys — have been trained.

Many Bangla Desh, training camps and base areas are on the Indian side of the border, but a growing number, of the Bengali troops have been operating from “liberated areas” just inside East Pakistan. These areas, though not large, have been expanding.

Some of the new recruits are being trained as regular troops and others as guerrillas. The latter adopt village dress and mix with the local population. There are many more volunteers, how ever, than the Mukti Bahini can absorb, primarily because of a shortage of weapons, and a large number of boys simply mark time after getting their rudimentary basic training—which is hardly more than physical exercises and elementary driving.

The Mukti Bahini's weapons are a motley lot. There are some Sten guns, light machine guns and other automatic Weapons, and many ancient single‐shot rifles: The heaviest Weapons in the arsenal are light and medium mortars—and not too many of them. These arms are of varying makes and age, some captured from the Pakistani troops and some— though far from enough, the Bengalis complain — provided by the Indians.

Yet with all these problems, the Mukti Bahini has effectively harassed the Pakistani Army, pinned it down in some areas and stretched its lines thin all over East Pakistan. Reliable reports indicate that Pakistani casualties are increasing. The guerrillas also continue to assassinate members of the local ‘’peace committees,” made up of non‐Bengalis and other collaborators assigned to carry out administration, of areas under army occupation. No figures are available on guerrilla casualties, but they are believed to be low. However, with every guerrilla raid, the army burns hamlets and kills villagers in reprisal.

The guerrillas’ greatest success has been their ability to reduce the army's mobility by keeping East Pakistan's communications system in chaos—blowing up bridges, roads arid rail lines. Guerrilla frogmen have also damaged or sunk at least a dozen seagoing ships—including several foreign ones —at anchor in harbors. Seven British shipping lines have suspended all traffic to East Pakistan.

Although the Mukti Bahini is much better coordinated than it was six months ago, it is not a monolithic fighting force. Splinter groups have started operations on their own, including some pro‐Peking Communists. One group, led by non‐Communist militant students from Dacca, is said to have established a base in the Indian border state of Tripura with a band of 1,500 men. Still; there is no sign at this point either of any serious division within the Bangla Desh movement or of the movement swinging to the left.

With the monsoon rains over and the ground firming up, it is expected that both the Mukti Bahini and the Pakistani troops will step up their activities in East Pakistan. Heavily guarded freight trains have hem rolling into Calcutta, carrying military supplies reportedly destined for the Mukti.

This seems to indicate that the Indian Government has agreed to increase its arms aid to the guerrillas.

But Mukti Bahini commanders, straining at the bit, continue to press for even more —Indian logistic support and air cover for a frontal offensive to seize a sizable piece of East Pakistan, where the Bangla Desh Government, now based in Calcutta, to be established.

The Indians have so far balked, because they feel this would immediately, provoke a general war with Pakistan. The Bangla Desh leaders argue that for all the effectiveness of guerrilla Warfare, its hit‐and‐run nature will sap the independence movement of Popular support because of the West Pakistani reprisals against the civilian population.

“We will lose the sympathy of many villagers,” said, one high Bengali officer. “They tell us, ‘if you want our support, you must come in full force, and stay and protect us.”
 
Last edited:
.
"They are the friends of our enemies" - M A Jinnah observing the rebellion of the Bengali students on the question of Urdu, a distinguisher for the sub-continental Muslims, being the state language

"India and BD are like husband and wife" - BD FM Abdul Momen

"BD is the most successful RAW ops" - B Raman, ex Deputy Chief of RAW

"BD is like Sita, rescued from the clutches of Ravana by Ram" - a top BJP leader

upload_2019-10-24_16-44-40.png
 
Last edited:
.
"They are the friends of our enemies" - M A Jinnah observing the rebellion of the Bengali students on the question of Urdu, a distinguisher for the sub-continental Muslims, being the state language

"India and BD are like husband and wife" - BD FM Abdul Momen

"BD is the most successful RAW ops" - B Raman, ex Deputy Chief of RAW

"BD is like Sita rescued from the clutches of Ravana" - a top BJP leader

View attachment 585953
They won the election fair and square. Should have let Mujib be PM instead of blaming India all the time.
 
.
Two yrs before 1971 war, RAW’s RN Kao told Indira Gandhi to be ready for Pakistan partition

In contrast, higher levels of MEA took a more conservative view and argued that Pakistan's unity was in India’s interest.


ZORAWAR DAULET SINGH 1 December, 2019 1:00 pm IST

Despite a domestic national election at home, Delhi was fully cognizant of the dramatic internal crisis in Pakistan’s body politic. There is also evidence to suggest that some of the ingredients of an interventionist strategy might have already been in place before events in East Pakistan exploded. Internal communications reveal two competing images. One image was represented by R.N. Kao, Chief of R&AW and Indira Gandhi’s trusted confidante, who perceived the crisis in more ominous terms and advocated an advantageous realpolitik to exploit Pakistan’s internal fissures. A second image was represented by sections in the MEA, who perceived the crisis in more benign terms and advocated a non-interventionist posture. Interestingly, as early as 1969, Kao had been arguing that East Pakistan was poised for deeper turmoil and possible secession and that India ‘should be prepared for it’. And his perceptions got stronger as the crisis came closer. In an April 1969 intelligence cable, he had foreseen an impending crisis across the border:

The authorities would have to resort to large-scale use of the Army and other paramilitary forces in East Pakistan to curb a movement, which has already gained considerable strength. The use of force is likely, in turn, to lead to a situation where the people of East Pakistan, supported by elements of the East Bengal Rifles (who are known to be sympathetic towards the secessionist movement as evidenced from the recent East Pakistan Conspiracy Case), may rise in revolt against the Central Authority and even declare their independence … although this possibility may not be immediate at present, it would be desirable that the Government of India should think about the policy it should adopt in such an eventuality and keep its options open.

Kao’s implied advice to exploit a crisis should it arise seems to fit comfortably with Indira Gandhi’s security seeker role. In contrast, the higher levels of the MEA were taking a more conservative view. Senior officials argued that Pakistan’s unity was in India’s interest, and hoped that the Awami League would emerge as the dominant political voice of a unified Pakistan, which in turn would change Pakistan’s external behaviour towards India. A classic exposition of this view was reflected in India’s then high commissioner to Islamabad, Krishna Acharya, who cabled Delhi on 2 December 1970 shortly after elections had been held in Pakistan. Given the relentless hostility of a West Pakistani-dominated government, Acharya argued that majority control of the National Assembly by the Bengalis seemed ‘to be our only hope for achieving our policy objectives towards Pakistan and overcoming this stonewall resistance of West Pakistan’. And, ‘in order that this hope may become a reality, however, it is essential that Pakistan (with its East Pakistan majority) should remain one, so that we may pursue our policy objectives through the leaders of East Pakistan’.

Not only did the Indian envoy espouse the virtues of Pakistani unity, albeit reformed under the influence of moderate Bengalis, he underscored the grave dangers and geopolitical risks of an independent Bangladesh, which might demand unity with India’s adjacent province of West Bengal, and that such a united Bengal was likely to come under the influence of pro-China Naxalites. Acharya warned that India’s ‘strategic and defence problems will be multiplied manifold’ by a breakup of Pakistan. Foreign Secretary T.N. Kaul also felt ‘that India should do nothing to encourage the separation of East Pakistan from West Pakistan but he added that it did not lie in India’s hands to stop it’. Sections of the mainstream media too favoured non-interference. For example, Girilal Jain, a leading journalist, suggested that ‘two propositions—a declaration of interest in Pakistan’s unity and an attempt to persuade the two superpowers not to interfere in its affairs’—could serve as policy guidelines as they did for Nehru.

The above belief from the MEA was a more passive and conservative outlook compared to Kao’s strategic activism, and arguably more consistent with Nehru’s conflict avoidance images. These two competing worldviews again reflected in a 6 January 1971 inter-agency meeting attended by senior MEA and R&AW officials. Kao argued that Bengali national aspirations had deep roots and were at a point of no return, with neither the Awami League nor West Pakistani leaders likely to find common ground after the League’s extraordinary electoral success. The Pakistan Army, moreover, would reject a fundamental change in Pakistani politics and would attempt to re-seize control of the situation. Kao defined the policy problem, as he had suggested in 1969: that India should prepare itself for the succession of East Bengal and develop a capacity to assist the liberation movement to achieve early success.

Kao was supported in this assessment by an MEA official, Asoke Ray, who concurred that a secessionist movement would advance India’s interests. This policy option was challenged by Acharya and another senior diplomat, S.K. Banerji, who argued that succession was not a foregone conclusion, and the Pakistani system’s ability to find a rational arrangement that preserved a unified state could not be ruled out. Why is it that the same material situation was being perceived by two such contrasting perspectives? It appears that Nehru’s core images regarding conflict avoidance and a reluctance to disturb the geopolitical status quo in the subcontinent were still strong in sections of the MEA. These officials perceived and defined events with an eye on stability and tension reduction as Nehru had done in the first East Bengal crisis in 1950. The competing images, embodied by Kao and Ray, were more consistent with Indira Gandhi’s beliefs, where the impulse to reshape the subcontinent’s order, coercively if necessary, was a natural reaction to Pakistan’s domestic problems.

By mid-January 1971, Kao’s perceptions were growing stronger and finding resonance with his colleagues at the apex. In a 14 January assessment, he noted that ‘hard liners’ in the military, the ‘privileged bureaucrats’, and ‘feudal interests’ might exert pressure on General Yahya Khan, the President and Army Chief, to try and reverse the trend towards the transfer of power to the Awami League. However, the Bengalis ‘and even some sections of the people in the Western Wing, would not be hoodwinked by such tactics’. Kao also highlighted the possibility of a diversionary military move by Pakistan in the form of ‘an infiltration campaign into J&K’ to deflect attention from its internal problems. P.N. Haksar too had recorded his uneasiness about Pakistan. The Awami League’s victory had complicated Pakistan’s internal problems and ‘the temptation’ for ‘external adventures’ had become greater. He advised the Prime Minister to instruct the Service Chiefs for an urgent military assessment including ‘recommendations of what the requirements of each of the Services are so that we can feel a sense of security’.

Meanwhile, events on the ground were confirming Kao’s hypothesis. In mid-February, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto of the Pakistan People’s Party ruled out negotiations with the Awami League to frame a new constitution and declared that his party would not attend the new National Assembly sessions. On 1 March, Yahya Khan announced a postponement of the National Assembly. Fearing a conspiracy, Mujibur Rahman responded with a call for a ‘peaceful non-cooperation’ movement, which galvanized people across East Pakistan. Indira Gandhi appears to have been persuaded by Kao’s definition of the problem because on 2 March the Prime Minister authorized the formation of a high level Committee consisting of the Cabinet Secretary, P.N. Haksar, R.N. Kao, T.N. Kaul, and the Home Secretary to examine the political, economic, and military implications of India assisting a Bangladesh liberation movement. The assessment included ‘the question whether West Pakistan would retaliate against India particularly in Kashmir’ and ‘whether there would be any military reaction on the part of China’. The R&AW Chief now sought to convince Haksar and the Prime Minister as to why India should initiate a sustained and speedy programme of assistance to the East Bengal liberation movement. While the Pakistan Army ‘may gain some temporary successes’, it would be ‘impossible for them anymore to completely crush the liberation movement’. The longer the struggle took, Kao argued, the greater were the prospects of the movement falling ‘into the hands of extremists and pro-China communists, in Bangladesh’. Hence, ‘it would be in our own interest to give aid, adequate and quick enough, to ensure the early success of the liberation movement under the control and guidance of the Awami League and its leaders’.’

It is apparent from her 2 March decision that Indira Gandhi was receptive to exploring the policy option of exploiting the crisis. This was a significant decision and is consistent with Indira Gandhi’s security seeker role. To be sure, policymakers were also being prudent by preparing for a possible diversionary ploy by Pakistan to export its internal vulnerability onto Kashmir or even the Indian heartland, as R&AW’s 14 January appreciation had indicated. Nehru too had agreed to make defensive military preparations to counteract a potential Pakistani move in Kashmir during the 1950 East Bengal crisis. This time, however, Indian intentions are clear from the apex-level Committee’s terms of reference: to examine a role in supporting the Bengali resistance inside Pakistan. The policy option being considered was not just predicated on deterrence but aimed at changing the status quo.

By mid-March, the crisis was out in the open. On 18 March, Delhi received a R&AW cable from Dhaka conveying Mujibur Rahman’s message, which repeated a ‘special appeal for help at this critical hour’. Expecting large reinforcements from West Pakistan, the Awami League leader sought Indian advice before deciding his next move. The telegram emphasized that ‘Mujib has no alternative but to fight for independence’. Haksar quickly reinforced R&AW’s recommendation and advised Indira Gandhi that India should not ‘say anything at all placatory, but be “tough” within reason’. This was ‘not the time to make gestures for friendship to Pakistan. Every such gesture will bring comfort to Yahya Khan and make the position of Mujib correspondingly more difficult … 2½ Divisions of Pak Army is poised to decimate East Bengal’.

https://theprint.in/pageturner/exce...hi-to-be-ready-for-pakistan-partition/325899/

 
.
An original kill list of Bangali intellectuals mostly murdered by the Pakistan Army and its auxiliaries.

80475375_10206536782854478_758647041592131584_n.jpg
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom