Ok
I will bite the bullet.
1. Why go to a surgeon?
go to a mullah. Will you? No? If you need to fight a case,
you go to lawyer. If you want to check what is wrong with an idea, you go to the detractors, not supporters of the idea. Got it?
Yea likewise you do not go to a mechanic when you need a surgery....so why are you not going to a scholar? Do you think the ones on answering Islam are some form of lawyers or scholars?
2. I am not a researcher of theology and religion. I utilize other's research. The same way everybody does with lot of things.
You are utilizing not research but misquotes, twisting words and nothing else...no research there even a 10th grader can do the same if he doesnt understand something he can simply twist the words to fit his needs..
3. Book with signs? WOW!! well you can see all the signs you want in all the things you want to see signs in but whether any of them is correct is a different ball game altogether. Almost all religious texts have "signs". Every one of them bite the dust when subjected to scientific scrutiny.
Contradicting yourself is a habit? 1st you criticize about signs in Quran then go and say all religious text have it...Meaning you are after all religious text? Well, what science have you seen wrong in the Quran, please put forward...so far you have not put forward science but talked about how it is wrong in the Quran (the same book you have never read)....so far all you were talking about was Hadith...it took us some 20 pages to tell you Hadith is not Allah's words and also not higher than Quran..
This perfectly explains why people immediately latch on to phenomenon like seeing jesus in a bread, milk drinking ganesha or as in this case, jesus predicting Mohammad's coming. They just want to see a sign which confirms to their preset believes. Let critical thinking go to hell..
Well, if they are signs why are you dying to disprove them...If they are not present...disprove them...
simple!