Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Vietnam need open local market to other 11x nations and import foreign goods with lower/free tariff ... now Vietnamese will tell u they can purchase 'Made in U.S' & 'Made in Japan' everyday with cheaper price ... but nobody care domestic makers' feeling.Maybe TPP is a good thing,
it gives vietnam a rare chance to show themselves on the world stage.
We China will wait some time and have a look.
If vietnam can survive,
then China will seek to join in.
Go,vietnam!
then China will seek to join in.
Go,vietnam!
Yes, it is ... another side, it's 'Made in Developed Nation' vs 'Made in Developing nation' ... commodity dumping & expand 'Made in U.S' export to other 11x nations.其实就是在不得已把你拉进群的情况下,再拉其他小伙伴新建一个群,实际上还是要把你给踢出去。LOL!!!Just for entertainment.
Really, TPP sets higher conduct code for China on purpose....
Yes, it is ... another side, it's 'Made in Developed Nation' vs 'Made in Developing nation' ... commodity dumping & expand 'Made in U.S' export to other 11x nations.
you don´t get it. everyone has a different motive why they join the pact. as for Vietnam, we try to make less dependent on China. and not to become a target. it is not about economy. China tries swallowing Vietnam since milleniums. TPP is the poison that Vietnam takes to make itself less attractive for China. Ever asked why we have abandoned Chinese scripts and adopted Latin characters?you want to increasing your profit by increasing the trade with the very country you are trying to contain against?
Never mind, today China isn't the 2001 China ... we'r world N.o2 economy & 1st biggest market with 1.35billion ppl, and Chinese PPP surpass U.S ... that means if 'Made in U.S' or 'Made in Japan' etc wanna selling in world 1st biggest market / in China, they'd better obeying Chinese rules ... Does Vietnam or other nations can replace huge China market for U.S export or Japan export ? Absolutely No !这个TPP也很明显是针对中国的。
COMPETITION POLICY AND STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
U.S. goals on competition policy and SOEs are grounded in long-standing principles of fair competition, consumer protection, and transparency. The United States is seeking rules to prohibit anticompetitive business conduct, as well as fraudulent and deceptive commercial activities that harm consumers. We are also pursuing pioneering rules to ensure that private sector businesses and workers are able to compete on fair terms with SOEs, especially when such SOEs receive significant government backing to engage in commercial activity.
Specifically, in the TPP we are seeking:
- Basic rules for procedural fairness on competition law enforcement;
- Commitments ensuring SOEs act in accordance with commercial considerations and compete fairly, without undue advantages from the governments that own them, while allowing governments to provide support to SOEs that provide public services domestically; and
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
- Rules that will provide transparency with respect to the nature of government control over and support for SOEs.
As the world’s most innovative economy, strong and effective protection and enforcement of IP rights is critical to U.S. economic growth and American jobs. Nearly 40 million American jobs are directly or indirectly attributable to “IP-intensive” industries. These jobs pay higher wages to their workers, and these industries drive approximately 60 percent of U.S. merchandise exports and a large share of services exports. In TPP, we are working to advance strong, state-of-the-art, and balanced rules that will protect and promote U.S. exports of IP-intensive products and services throughout the Asia-Pacific region for the benefit of producers and consumers of those goods and services in all TPP countries. The provisions that the United States is seeking – guided by the careful balance achieved in existing U.S. law – will promote an open, innovative, and technologically-advanced Asia-Pacific region, accelerating invention and creation of new products and industries across TPP countries, while at the same time ensuring outcomes that enable all TPP countries to draw on the full benefits of scientific, technological, and medical innovation, and take part in development and enjoyment of new media, and the arts.
Specifically, in the TPP we are seeking:
- Strong protections for patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets, including safeguards against cyber theft of trade secrets;
- Commitments that obligate countries to seek to achieve balance in their copyright systems by means of, among other approaches, limitations or exceptions that allow for the use of copyrighted works for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research;
- Pharmaceutical IP provisions that promote innovation and the development of new, lifesaving medicines, create opportunities for robust generic drug competition, and ensure affordable access to medicines, taking into account levels of development among the TPP countries and their existing laws and international commitments;
- New rules that promote transparency and due process with respect to trademarks and geographical indications;
- Strong and fair enforcement rules to protect against trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy, including rules allowing increased penalties in cases where counterfeit or pirated goods threaten consumer health or safety; and
TRANSPARENCY, ANTICORRUPTION AND REGULATORY COHERENCE
- Internet service provider “safe harbor” provisions, as well as strong and balanced provisions regarding technological protection measures to foster new business models and legitimate commerce in the digital environment.
Through TPP, we are seeking to make trade across the TPP region more seamless, including by improving the coherence of TPP regulatory systems, enhancing transparency in policy-making processes, and combatting corruption. These “good government” reforms also play an important role in ensuring fairness for American firms and workers
Specifically, in the TPP we are seeking:
- Commitments to promote greater transparency, participation, and accountability in the development of regulations and other government decisions, including by promptly publishing laws, regulations, administrative rulings of general application, and other procedures that affect trade and investment, and providing opportunities for stakeholder comment on measures before they are adopted and finalized;
- For the first time in a U.S. trade agreement, a chapter on regulatory coherence, including commitments on good regulatory practices; and
这些个条款对中国来说很难实现的,比如让国企和私企在同等条件下去竞争,限制政府对国企的干预和支持。还有保护知识产权,政府决策透完全明化。还有就是,成员国90%货物关税立刻免除,所有产品关税12年内免除,这不扯淡呢么。不过中国确实没有履行加入WTO时候的一些承诺,所以别人另起炉灶。
- Commitments discouraging corruption and establishing codes of conduct to promote high ethical standards among public officials.
是啊,这就是不平等条约,规则永远是强国制定的,真正有利于谁一目了然。不过我是这样理解的,对于越南来说,没有更好的选择了,美国吃肉,能跟着喝点汤已经不错了,不然只能喝西北风了。越南目前顶多还处在工业化初级阶段,经济却已经萎了,现在只能抱TPP的大腿了。
越南确定2015年经济增长目标为6.2%中华人民共和国商务部网站
越南《投资报》12月29日消息,29日,越南政府与各地方召开电视电话会议,会议主题为讨论实施2015年各项宏观经济调控政策。
2014年月越南GDP增长5.98%,通胀1.84%,超额完成既定目标。在2014年较好的经济发展形势下,越南2015年GDP增长目标确定为6.2%,通胀率为5%。(Vietnam 2015 GDP growth targets at 6.2%, with a 5.0% inflation rate)2014年出口超过1500亿美元,同比增长13.6%,顺差20亿美元;社会总投资122.7万亿盾(约合54.63亿美元),同比增长11.5%,占GDP比例为30.7%;未偿还信贷债务增加13%;扣除价格因素商品零售总额和营业收入增长6.25%,明显高于去年,这意味着经济总需求有明显改善。上述宏观经济指数,尤其是较低的通胀率为越南宏观经济继续稳定增长、商品和公共服务的市场体制改革、减少企业费用、促进生产经营、行业结构调整创造了条件。
2015年越南经济复苏的后盾仍是越韩自贸协定、与俄罗斯、白俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的三国关税同盟协定、与EU自贸协定、东盟经济共同体的形成,以及可能谈判成功的TPP协定的签订。很多投资与贸易的机会已经证明上述协定的促进作用。
尽管如此,前路仍充满巨大困难与挑战。世界经济形势变化的不确定性,如新兴经济体中国、俄罗斯,甚至日本都正处于经济增长下滑态势;世界局部地区政治形势紧张,如俄罗斯与乌克兰、俄罗斯与美国和欧盟;世界原油价格下滑,都对世界经济复苏产生消极影响,也对越南经济产生直接影响。
2015年经济增长6.2%和通胀5%的目标尽管具有可行性,但也需付出巨大努力。(撰稿人:蒋春瑜)
where did I insult VN ? are you kidding me ?
really ? this is your explanation ?
it means vietman higher level political figures will get benefits only
these companies will come to your country and can do any illegal thing for business profit and they will be above law.
you might have to buy contaminated foods with high price, ever think of that ?