Summary of what you said good sir or madam.....
Quote summarized: I HAVE A LIFE DONT JUDGE ME grumble grumble grumble...
Its not my language neither but I still don't use word or any other typo correction options. And about the "Crap" comment, so you ran out of words and banged the keyboard with the first words that came to mind wow that's very civil isn't it.
and yes two dudes with radios will and do hide in urban combat zones ONLY as that way you melt away from reality and just fade into the population and that one just proved my point bub.
All tanks are not EQUAL game whether in urban warfare or open terrain combat....again don't your tac ops officers make you watch camera data and stuff???
The word is willy nilly and no again your point of the "two dudes with a radio" pretty much answers that assertion asymmetrical warfare is an entirely different game with entirely different dimensions and urban warfare is the most intrinsic and inalienable part of it as all present combat zones are in urban areas except Afghanistan as its miserable terrain isn't worth the price of armor [Including the Swat valley here in Pakistan as our soldiers learned the hard way]
As for point three......so uh Bashar Ul Asad and Hezbollah are idiots for using T-72 variants to combat numerically superior rebel units in major Syrian cities -_- wow I mean that's the difference between people above the rank of Colonel and those below it.
As for your failure to understand the restriction thing....ask your mechanics...the ones who maintain your targeting systems and computers....I am starting to doubt your even a soldier I mean this is fairly standard stuff.
I just want to ask you one question. Have you ever been to combat inside any armoured vehicle?? Better yet, have YOU EVER BEEN ON AN ARMOURED VEHICLE.
Point 1.) All tank are not fair game, that part is true,
but only when they are out in the open. I said, all tanks are fair game
WHEN YOU DRIVE YOURSELVES IN A URBAN STREET. Do you even know why?? DO you know you can only see a bit over the the Driver hatch or the commander hatch have a 360 degree view OVER the turret. If you want to see more you would need to exit the hatch, which present yourselves as a legitimate target for any Jack and Joe with a hunting rifle.
Tactical Officer teach you
NOT TO DRIVE A TANK IN URBAN AREA without Infantry overwatch.
Do you even know how many blind spot there are in tank that you cannot see out until you half exit off the hatch?? There's a lot, again, give me 4 men and I can capture any tank in this godly world in a urban setting, I am not joking.
Point 2.) 2 guys with a radio is very EASY to seek out of with Infrared or Thermal Imaging, tell me one combat vehicle, land or air does not loaded with Thermal Imaging? So attack like this is very easy to make out.
You do realise we are in 21 century, not 20th century anymore, this kind of op is very easy to conduct.
How I melt away from reality, seems like you are the one melt away from reality.
Point 3.)
The word is willy nilly and no again your point of the "two dudes with a radio" pretty much answers that assertion asymmetrical warfare is an entirely different game with entirely different dimensions and urban warfare is the most intrinsic and inalienable part of it as all present combat zones are in urban areas except Afghanistan as its miserable terrain isn't worth the price of armor [Including the Swat valley here in Pakistan as our soldiers learned the hard way
So you turn into grammar nazi to avoid my point eh??
I am not talking about asymmetrical warfare, I am talking about using a tank in Urban combat. Big different. If you want to open a thread and go on for asymmetrical warfare, I will be there.
By the way, this is the third time saying it,
I AM NOT SAYING ASYMMETRICAL WARFARE IS GOING TO BE FADE AWAY, OR NOT HERE TO STAY. You have completely and
UTTERLYmissing the point here.
Point 4.) Dude, I do not know what is in the mind of Bashar Ul Asad or Hezbollah, They are not taught as the way I was taught. Unless one day they are inline with US Military Doctrine, I cannot speak for either Hezbollah or Ul Asad.
Dude,
if you say they use tank in urban environment, and we should too, then think about this. They use Suicide bomber in the street of Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria, does that mean we should too?? Different country, or regime have a different way of fighting, I am surprise that you do not understand this fundamental concept. You concept is not logical at best, or Forced.
Point 5. Seems to me,
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE RESTRICTION. You are thinking Tank is invincible, correction, non US Tank are invincible. Which I have proved you wrong. You have
NO IDEA how armour system work. You have no idea how armoured warfare are fought, you have no idea what can you see from inside an Armour, and then you come lecture me. I don't really care if I was a soldier or what not, I did not ask for this professional title, somebody in this forum with authority think I am, you can doubt all you want.
Just answer me this, do you think Tank should be use in Urban warfare, Alone??
Revisit the price once more, no modern tank will cost that cheap, unless it is really cheap.. 
I had to hit that point home.......tanks are not invincible.....I know that and nowhere have I contradicted that.....
