What's new

11 cops, 4 jawans killed by Maoists in Chhattisgarh

two constitutions, two law systems --> two nations.
not rocket science.

you need to be honest with your own history: india was never a unified nation, there was no nation called india in history. because of this, in a long run, people in india will eventually ask for such independence.

you don't have a unified language
you don't have a unified culture
you don't have a unified religion
you don't have a shared history

that tells a lot.

if you look at the US, there was no US in history, but:

they have unified language
they have unified culture
they have unified religion
they have shared history -- the link with europe


where did you got those 2 constitutions. as far as maoism goes they want to overthrow democracy and want communism for india.

Thats the real beauty of india that there is unity in diversity. Even maoist dont want a separate state but want to change the governance of india.

As far as the unifying factor goes there is a one unifying factor that unifies whole of india with so many cultural and other diffrences and that is

We Are Indians

and that is more than enogh for us.


And let me tell you with the same linguistic groups. have a look at pakistan with so many similarities among people. have alook at the pre world war europe. the similarties are not iota for the stability of a nation. even the same groups cannot live with peace so forget it.
 
.
These maoist infected state should raise special force like greyhound commandos in Andhra which has a significant success in these operations....and these commandos are recruited from tribal Ares and these people are very much familiar with the terrain and people…which makes easy for them to gather information ....
 
.
two constitutions, two law systems --> two nations.
not rocket science.

you need to be honest with your own history: india was never a unified nation, there was no nation called india in history. because of this, in a long run, people in india will eventually ask for such independence.

you don't have a unified language
you don't have a unified culture
you don't have a unified religion
you don't have a shared history

that tells a lot.

if you look at the US, there was no US in history, but:

they have unified language
they have unified culture
they have unified religion
they have shared history -- the link with europe

China is a very homogeneous country. But still the few minorities have created trouble eg: Tibetans, Uighurs, followers of Fulong Gong, advocates of democracy etc. compared to that, India with his hundreds of ethnicity is much more harmonious.
 
.
two constitutions, two law systems --> two nations.
not rocket science.

you need to be honest with your own history: india was never a unified nation, there was no nation called india in history. because of this, in a long run, people in india will eventually ask for such independence.

you don't have a unified language
you don't have a unified culture
you don't have a unified religion
you don't have a shared history

that tells a lot.

if you look at the US, there was no US in history, but:

they have unified language
they have unified culture
they have unified religion
they have shared history -- the link with europe

by your logic, USA and UK should merge.. Innit ??
 
.
China is a very homogeneous country. But still the few minorities have created trouble eg: Tibetans, Uighurs, followers of Fulong Gong, advocates of democracy etc. compared to that, India with his hundreds of ethnicity is much more harmonious.

India is more harmonious?

Is that why India is ranked as "extreme risk" (highest category) on the Terrorism Risk Index, while China is ranked as "low risk" (lowest category)?
 
.
They aren't Maoists! They are Lashkar-e-Taiba, that the Pakistanis are sending. Of course all terrorism within India comes from Pakistan, fools. :what:

Is this your way of admitting the truth:yahoo:
 
.
India is more harmonious?

Is that why India is ranked as "extreme risk" on the Terrorism Risk Index, while China is ranked at the lowest category ("low risk")?


Heyyy.. high risk ..low risk.. it was missing in forum today.. Thanks a million.

Well said Bro :tup:
 
. . .
We rather pull a China....

JDME man what is your problem your off thread again, All countries should try to keep their people and avoid this kind of thing but sometimes its not possible.
 
. . . . .
you truely believe those maoists are on their own?

you also need to understand that when you deploy your army to handle them, it becomes an official civil war, the matter can then be brought into UNSC for a full discussion. trust me dude, it won't be in india's favor.

CRPF is not army ! If we deploy army we wont be having this problem
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom