Well I am sure this has been discussed to death over and over again but i goes down to what capability exactly the IAF is seeking.
If they seek a complete all around Multi-role jack of all trade master of none then by all mean anything other than the Rafale is an atrocious decision. Because for Instance in the RSAF's case they were after an Air Superiority fighter first and foremost and thus the Typhoon seemed like the logical choice.
The reasons why the EF was shortlisted can only be the projected capability of a T3B and the industrial offers, which were as important as the operational advantages of the fighters.
The T3B is meant to be a more multi role capable fighter as well, with Storm Shadow cruise missiles for deep strikes as well. However, since none of the new capabilities are developed yet, let alone even funded by any partner nation, it was clearly the worse choice for India, because we already have our air superiority fighters with MKI / Super 30 and FGFA in future.
Btw, this competition was for IAF only, IN has another evaluation, where EF, Rafale, Gripen, F18SH, Mig 29K were offered.
whether rafale or typhoon. Germany will be in profit both ways. 30+% share in Dassault is german.
That's not correct, the share belongs to EADS, which is equally lead by German and French shareholders (with some minor Spanish shares too) and the only profit would be, if the Dassault Aviation shares would increase their value, otherwise there is no relation.