What's new

10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

Actually, The ground situation is:
china does claim upto finger 2
India does claim upto finger 8

Undefined LAC is finger 4 but since both side claims.... not one ready to accept the LAC

So Previously, There were no military from the both sides on borders between finger 2 to finger 8. Both military were used to patrol as well within finger 2 to 8.

Now after incidents, China has made base upto near by finger 4 and India as well near 100 miters by finger 4.

Now Indian politicians are jumping and blaming to Modi because Indian army is unable to patrol upto finger 8. But the same goes to chinese.... they are unable to patrol upto finger 2. Both are limited upto finger 4 lac ( Undefined border)...

The india is demanding to restore the previous situation.... between finger 2 to finger 8.... and the indian opposite politician Leaders Rahul and party is crying!
surrender modi right now will be
104653250_294422748590778_2984425405162304919_n.jpg
 
. .
Caste made you lose south tibet?
I don't tjink we lost it, we vacated because its not easily defended after we succesfully invaded by massacring weak INDIAN army, lol. You just crept in after we left.cockroaches do that.

Freedom to kill han chinese in the name of CCP

Sounds about right.

Where's your grandpa, casualty of cultural revolution i assume?
From historical records, it seems we are more successful in killing Indians? Next time don't flee and jump into the river. Learn from the 10 who surrendered. Lol
 
. .
Last edited:
. .

The Chinese have taken their eye off the ball as far as India is concerned, in particular China has a poor airbase infrastructure facing India right now. India, has that as an advantage against China right now, and one China needs to address by building more multi-runway airbases facing off India.

China's ability to generate air missions against India right now, is quite compromised.
 
.
Actually, The ground situation is:
china does claim upto finger 2
India does claim upto finger 8

Undefined LAC is finger 4 but since both side claims.... not one ready to accept the LAC

So Previously, There were no military from the both sides on borders between finger 2 to finger 8. Both military were used to patrol as well within finger 2 to 8.

Now after incidents, China has made base upto near by finger 4 and India as well near 100 miters by finger 4.

Now Indian politicians are jumping and blaming to Modi because Indian army is unable to patrol upto finger 8. But the same goes to chinese.... they are unable to patrol upto finger 2. Both are limited upto finger 4 lac ( Undefined border)...

The india is demanding to restore the previous situation.... between finger 2 to finger 8.... and the indian opposite politician Leaders Rahul and party is crying!
Keep lying.


China has no claim line there- what finger 2? 'Finger 2' is what the Indian army PRAYs the Chinese only wants.


If anything, china claims the whole lake and lands beyond it
 
Last edited:
. . .
Keep lying.


China has no claim line there- what finger 2? 'Finger 2' is what the Indian army PRAYs the Chinese only wants.


If anything, china claims the whole lake and lands beyond it
You see, if they extend our claim line, then it makes it seem they didn't lose much. Its the pathetic face saving shit at work again.

Don't post unknown tweet sources. You will find hundreds which are fighting on Twitter
Yah and Indians readily accept 43 dead without questioning the source too.

So now the India media is clearly reporting that Chinese forces have taken territory they perceive as theirs.
Modi said not an inch lost mate and the Chinese has withdrew same like Doklam.
 
.
You see, if they extend our claim line, then it makes it seem they didn't lose much. Its the pathetic face saving shit at work again.


Yah and Indians readily accept 43 dead without questioning the source too.
There needs to be a gunshot, seriously. The whole of ladahk, south tibet and purang sumda would be liberated in a matter of weeks.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom