You mean this guy?
Hu Xijin
Well... Enough said...
This is a well respected source on PDF.Just search how many global times articles are taken as gospel here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean this guy?
Hu Xijin
Well... Enough said...
please have some mercy 20 log mary hain in ke bhai bhaga bhaga ker dandy se mara china neDo you expect us to take you seriously after this excuse?
If india never occupied the territory than what the fak fak was your military there for decades?
Why the fk was your govt discussing the issue with China?Why were you demanding a chinese withdrawl for?
Why the fk were you having a stand off for?
What did your troops die for? Why did chinese capture dozens of your troops?
Go home you are drunk..
Both sides grabbed chunks of an independent J&K. Have you wrested much from territory under our control?We're holding onto AJK just fine.
I don't even know what's Nirvaansh, forget about Chinese understanding this term..Sirf maara nahi,nirvansh kar diya.
Meant for han,not for you.I'm sure you have no problems with reproduction.
We shouldn't hold back on treacherous ambushes and surprise attacks by deceit. If there's a war, you should forget all these things. Even we should without hesitation indulge in these things if that helps us attain something.Only good at choreographed drills and treacherous ambushes and surprise attacks by deciet.When it came to face to face fighting,shown their aukat.
What lesson they have to teach you after slaughtering so many of your soldiers?
Have you ever seen a winner again saying "I will kill him"? They have already taught a lesson, it's now your turn to respond.
This is how winners behave.. with humility.
They don't have to do anything after beating the crap out of you guys.. They even captured your soldiers. If you had responded in time, you could have freed your soldiers.. They themselves had to send them over to you.
Come on man, bring a new story to the table.
This whole thread is a shitfest. Both indians and pakistanis trying to talk about who inflicted the most casualties. That shouldn't even matter.
What matters are objectives like i explained in my previous post. Only nationalists care about the casualties. Real strategists care about the objectives which are territorial gains or defending set points. These objectives win you the overall war. Soldiers can be replaced, territory cannot.
americans haan ????Americans say 35 at least.I guess they are face saving too.Lol.
Hans have gone all quiet,both i print media as well as army spokesperson level.Now they say we dont want to escalate any further.What happened to teaching india a lesson and marching on delhi?
40 extinguished han bloodlines wiped out forever seems to have shocked them.
Sirf maara nahi,nirvansh kar diya.
I don't know why they are saying that Chinese need to show anger? I mean a guy has killed you and should still show anger???The indians are responding well to being massacred by the Chinese by posting 1000s of posts on PDF............
They are acting as if they are masters of the universe.
China is potentially the number one threat, as it is a powerful enemy. Future acquisitions will be China focused. No one said all our weapons are China specific. Some are. Probably just the ICBMs.hmmm.. is this a U turn ?.... your leaders always say China your number one threat?.. all weapons are against china?..
so which is it?
China or Pakistan?
India giving a befitting response to China.