10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

[Kai Liu]

As per the history and records, China will never disclosed casulities from his side

1967: In Sikkim, India pushes China back

• Tensions came to a head again in 1967 along two mountain passes, Nathu La and Cho La, that connected Sikkim — then a kingdom and a protectorate of India — and China’s Tibet Autonomous Region.
• A scuffle broke out when Indian troops began laying barbed wire along what they recognized as the border.
• The scuffles soon escalated when a Chinese military unit began firing artillery shells at the Indians.
• In the ensuing conflict, more than 150 Indians and 340 Chinese were killed.
• The clashes in September and October 1967 in those passes would later be considered the second all-out war between China and India.
• But India prevailed, destroying Chinese fortifications in Nathu La and pushing them farther back into their territory near Cho La.
• The change in positions, however, meant that China and India each had different and conflicting ideas about the location of the Line of Actual Control.
• The fighting was the last time that troops on either side would be killed. — until the skirmishes in the Galwan Valley on Tuesday.

https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/india-china-border-dispute-a-conflict-years-in-the-making/

1967 Nathu La conflict
Another flashpoint was Nathu La, India's highest mountain pass in northeastern Sikkim state, which is sandwiched between Bhutan, Chinese-ruled Tibet and Nepal.

During a series of clashes, including the exchange of artillery fire, New Delhi said some 80 Indian soldiers died and counted up to 400 Chinese casualties.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...es-decades-long-conflict-200617025851066.html

Wikipedia 1967 again...lol...
But where is the proof? Can you show something like this:

or this:

???

 

[PakSword]

Chinese now want talks.

They always wanted talks.. Even Pakistan wanted talks while our jets were bombing the surroundings of your Div HQs and you were shooting down your own helis with scores of soldiers inside.

 

[kongn]

What lesson they have to teach you after slaughtering so many of your soldiers?

Have you ever seen a winner again saying "I will kill him"? They have already taught a lesson, it's now your turn to respond.

Then why is their cheerleader number one global times editor looking mournful and tamed and begging his followers to stand with government and have faith in army?He should be celebrating this massacre of indian soldiers,he was warning india a couple of days back.What happened now?Why so tame?
Sirf maara nahi,nirvansh kar diya.

 

[HammerHead081]

i just pointed history of chinese to hide their casualties...

This whole thread is a shitfest. Both indians and pakistanis trying to talk about who inflicted the most casualties. That shouldn't even matter.

What matters are objectives like i explained in my previous post. Only nationalists care about the casualties. Real strategists care about the objectives which are territorial gains or defending set points. These objectives win you the overall war. Soldiers can be replaced, territory cannot.

 

[PakSword]

What happened to superpower dragon?Just 40 han bloodlines exterminated and already balls dropped off?

Not working.

 

[PakFactor]

the same US intelligence whom belive WMD in iraq ?????????

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-an-intelligence-failure-or-white-house-spin/

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/12/leadup-iraq-war-timeline/


https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...28/ari-fleischer-iraq-lies-george-w-bush-wmds

My thoughts exactly, them and their "intelligence assessment", we've seen enough to ignore it.

 

[Zohair Alam]

both are powerful enough to take care each other..

Why Russia then?

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

Do you expect us to take you seriously after this excuse?

If india never occupied the territory than what the fak fak was your military there for decades?

Why the fk was your govt discussing the issue with China?Why were you demanding a chinese withdrawl for?


Why the fk were you having a stand off for?

What did your troops die for? Why did chinese capture dozens of your troops?


Go home you are drunk..

Laugh all you want. I know you are trying very hard to hide the pain of losing 35 of your Mae baaps yesterday. If it makes you feel better.

 

[Kai Liu]

Then why is their cheerleader number one global times editor looking mournful and tamed and begging his followers to stand with government and have faith in army?He should be celebrating this massacre of indian soldiers,he was warning india a couple of days back.What happened now?Why so tame?
Sirf maara nahi,nirvansh kar diya.

You mean this guy?
Hu Xijin

Well... Enough said...

 

[PakFactor]

In the absence of any information coming from China for this long, US intelligence sources are the only source of neutral information we have on China's casualties.

Love how Pakistanis believed unnamed US officials completely when they claimed that all Pakistani F-16 were accounted for after the clash with Indian Air Force. Then they were very unbiased. But now suddenly they are biased.

That report came directly from the Pentagon in an official release. We know you Pajits are still butt hurt about the whopping you recieved, lol, go apply some almond oil and get a massage.

 

[kongn]

Not working.

Sirf maara nahi,nirvansh kar diya.
Meant for han,not for you.I'm sure you have no problems with reproduction.

 

[PakSword]

Then why is their cheerleader number one global times editor looking mournful and tamed and begging his followers to stand with government and have faith in army?He should be celebrating this massacre of indian soldiers,he was warning india a couple of days back.What happened now?Why so tame?
Sirf maara nahi,nirvansh kar diya.

This is how winners behave.. with humility.

They don't have to do anything after beating the crap out of you guys.. They even captured your soldiers. If you had responded in time, you could have freed your soldiers.. They themselves had to send them over to you.

Come on man, bring a new story to the table.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Few corrections. This was never territory under Indian control. Chinese are on disputed territory and they are vacating. Eventually they will just like Doklam. Especially with us killing scores of them in this manner.



The F-16 claim was from a US magazine Foreign Policy relying on unnamed sources. NY times and others just reported the magazine's claim.

It was widely published by reputable papers worldwide. The journalist has openly challenged you to prove her wrong.
Even your beloved anti Pak Christine C Fair bashed you on your own event.. and the migs payload etc ate nough to bury indian nonsensical claims.. amyways...

As already confirmed by an American member F 22 here, US News and report is a reliable and respected source.

f-22 is just another anti china troll, in the same boat as chinese trolls who boasting bout nuking everything that moves (no offence to sensible chinese posters), and so what if some US poster acknowledges the reputation of some rather obscure ranking website thats posting “speculations” by an unnamed US intel source whose claims cant be verified? Can US go on ground and verify it ? the US technicians in Pak surely could...

 

[Imran Khan]

doura doura k mara
jooton se mara
laaton se mara
keelon se mara
dandon se mara
kisi ki ankh phori
kisi ki taang tori
kisi ka munh tora
wo dekho wo dekho
sub kuch tor diya
aur to aur bharat ka
supa powa ban ney ka
sapna bhi tor dia


Arey MODEEE GEEE ........ MODEEE GEEE .....Kuch to BOLIEYEEE

2012 super power bana tha india
2019 pakistan se maar khai
2020 china se maar khai
2021 god know kon thukai kary ga india ki

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Your army took cricket bats and hockey sticks to battle

Wah Indians, wah

What is wrong with that? indians love cricket and hockey.