Okay, so I have seen a lot of things in this thread. My two cents: there's no universal way to judge intelligence agencies, since the best and most covert activities are kept classified.
That being said, there are two contenders for #1. That is the CIA and the MI6. CIA because its connectivity...
Nope. US and EU have an arms embargo on PRC. Pistols used by China include QSZ-92 and and Type 67. Assault rifles used by China include QBZ-03 and QBZ-95. Their equipment is either Russian or indigenously developed. Or what they develop from the remains of Western equipment. Bottom line: they...
I really can't understand what part of "encouraging the act" you can't understand. Here, encouraging means causing the sinners to sin more. Hence, generating more sin.
To take an extreme, a person selling guns to terrorist isn't gonna shoot the gun. But don't you think that the dealer is as...
We have literally reached the wall where we could keep on repeating the arguments we made before, to no effect. So to save us time, let's just agree to disagree and move on.
"It's a sin either way" exactly. So what watching porno is doing is encouraging the market of sin, resulting in more of this sin for profits. Making sense now?
It doesn't. But since we were talking about premarital s*x in general, does it actually matter why a couple is having s*x? (Since it is in context with the Islamic belief that premarital s*x is a sin)
The original question was that "is watching = doing?" I gave my point of view on that. Simple as f*ck (no pun intended).
Irrelevant trolling will be ignored.
My demand and supply argument is very simple. Very. Bear with me, and maybe you will get smart:
If you have s*x, you sin yourself. If you watch porno, you encourage others to have s*x. How complicated is that?