Search results

I lived in the Gulf for several years. I know what they're like. So long as you're not poor, dharmic or dark-skinned, they treat you fine (not saying that this type of behaviour is correct, but there's no point in exaggerating). You're exaggerating it quite a bit.

Lmao I doubt you've ever even been to the Gulf.

No, you freed a pseudo-colony from our rule. Sad, but not heartbreaking. If it really were splitting us in two, all those Urdu speakers wouldn't have left with us. The real breaking in two was when Muslims carved out Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh from your darling Akhand Bharat.

Wow, I did not know that. I always assumed that after the original OOA arrivals to the region, there wasn't anybody else migrating here in substantial numbers until the Aryans came along. It's probably more accurate to suggest a synthesis occurred between the Aryans and local people of the...

In the short term? Yes, but a better solution imo would be to just focus on Project Azm and keep churning out as many Thunders as possible until then (whilst also upgrading them along the way). Purchasing large numbers of brand new 4th gen fighters we haven't used before is a little futile at...

In that case, it sounds perfectly fair.

I wasn't educated in Pakistan, but if this is what they teach, alhamdulillah, the education system must be better than I thought. Hahaha, your dirty hands have never been able to even touch Lahore. You tried during partition, you tried again in 1965, you tried yet again in 1971, and you can...

1. The PA only surrendered because of the futility of the situation, I'd like to see how the IA fairs when being outnumbered 15:1 and cut off from India. But I don't think that situation will emerge because between you and me, you're not capable of ruling over others.

Muslims make up 15% of the population, and you know very well the kind of storm we can create over these incidents. It's not feasible unless you want to spark a civil war. The ones I've seen would all love to so long as they can kill/convert us (the inhabitants). I'm not trying anything...

But why should all of Facebook be forced to follow such laws? That seems rather unfair. If you don't like it, why not make your own social media platform?

Yes, you can. There are things that are true and things that aren't. Stop using this hippie-dippie nonsense logic.

We have elections, therefore we're a democracy. Now you're just being stupid. That has no bearing on how democratic it is.

That argument would only work if Indians were capable of removing the Muslims, when you're not. And Muslims are still underrepresented in the Indian government, as well as subject to numerous atrocities (Gujarat riots, Hyderabad massacre, the oppression in Kashmir, being lynched for killing...

Of course, I'd expect an idiot like you to not only be unable to take a joke, but also use an example as dumb as this one to try and actually suggest Muslims are somehow inferior fighters to Indians. The PA was outnumbered 15 times over, and were not put into labour camps. Bhutto didn't come...

You're just upset that I showed the inherent logical inconsistency of your argument. Your job to find out, not mine to explain. Oh please, we only waged wars of expansion across the region because throughout history, you've refused to be amicable with us. Muslims first came to India as...