Search results

The core Jianzhou Jurchen population was relatively small to compared to the groups they conquered and many "Han" already settled amongst the Jianzhou Jurchens or were directly absorbed into the Manchu banners. I think it would be the other way around,Kangxi,Qianlong and Yongzheng had Han...

Why should the PRC intervene when its own citizens commit crimes abroad? The fishermen clearly trespassed and are being punished. US has nothing to with this topic,project your inferiority complex elsewhere.

Are you serious? The international community recognizes PRC as the sole ruler of China,including Vietnam.

They have no legitimacy over the mainland. Cry some more hypocrite,you can't even defend claims and you have the gall to call other people trolls.

Your analogy doesn't work,ROC was internationally recognized to be the successor of the Qing empire and the PRC of the ROC therefore PRC is able to utilize Qing era maps as evidence. Mongols ruled in a Chinese fashion just like the rest of the nomads who became emperors,they claimed legitimacy...

Though this wouldn't fly in international court I believe waters like these should be shared to defuse tensions on all sides. I'm not well versed in the history of SCS islands,I reserve my judgement for the moment being as there are contradictory sources. He's quite predictable so he always...

Its so boring conversing with EastSea he just parrots the same debunked assumptions and tries to peddle it as "history". I'm sure you've seen my posts before,he either directly ignores them or goes on wild tangents.

Just a minor correction,even the Qing had hereditary native houses(tusi) in parts of Huguang and Guangxi. Chinese officials thought that the semi Sinicized chieftans could handle the natives better than themselves, so in return for nominal recognition of Chinese suzerainty they pretty much...

Give it up,your masquerade is over. You attempt to put yourself on a higher pedestal than others when you're spiteful racist.

Nothing will justify your racism and your blatant trolling. @Hu Songshan I ask that you punish us both for off topic and ad hominems.

Again provide the source,you claimed that mainland chinese history books claim Genghis Khan as their own yet you don't even show any texts. Its not taught in Chinese schools I've even asked my relatives in mainland China,keep on spewing out your propaganda that PRC brainwashes their children.

I agree,college graduates are making the same amount of money as my father did when he graduated from college.(I'm not even calculating inflation so in reality it would be even lower)

Why are Malays trying to claim they are more Chinese than the PRC Chinese?:cheesy: The PRC is recognized internationally as the legitimate by the UN end of discussion,KMT sore losers should lament the corruption that led to their downfall in the mainland. I find it disgusting how Lux de...

Implying Taiwanese Han look any different from Southern Fujianese:woot: I've visited Xiamen and Quanzhou they don't look any different from Taiwanese Han. Taiwanese are not Malay don't project your own SEA blood on Taiwanese Han. Then again you think Fujianese are Sinicized Malays:cheesy:

First off the battle of Zhuolu belongs to myth and should not be used as history. It also would be unfair to label all Miao groups as having one homogeneous origin. Ancient texts usually link Chiyou with the Jiuli while other link him with Shaohao,Yandi and Taihao(Fuxi?). Both Ying Zheng and...

How many times do Vietnamese want to peddle their lies,they have the audacity to claim everything as Vietnamese:omghaha: Nanyue is Chinese,Vietnamese simply hijacked its history to suit their own purposes. Why do Vietnamese always claim that Yue people are Viet,the Baiyue of Southern China did...

That's all they are capable of,stealing history and culture and trying convince the world they are the origin of East Asian civilization:cheesy: Even the term Yue/Viet was a Chinese label not an indigenous one. As for Van Lang its a mythological state that they try to pass off as ruling...

Why doesn't the 吳越春秋 or 越絕書 mention this event? You have no contemporary textual evidence or archaeological evidence to back up your claims. Minyue don't have their own history book because they are gone,either way they have nothing to do with Vietnamese as they were most likely Austronesians...

What I mean is that it doesn't even bother devoting a chapter for the dynasty,the preface also mentions Huangdi,Yu,Zhou kings and Shu Pan does that mean they are Vietnamese?:cheesy: You just dug your own grave,大越史略 doesn't mention the size of Van Lang,and fails to mention Xich Quy. Repeat your...

嶺南摭怪 is not history and 大越史略 doesn't mention the Hung Kings.