They did. Here's a couple of links:
757 Wreckage
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
But all this is really for people who aren't trying to find reasons to disbelieve. So it might not be for you.
I guess my point was that the Rafale's fly away cost is around 100 mil. So this still quite a bit cheaper. I can't imagine that the life cycle cost is going to exceed that of the Rafale by 35 million
It's 65 mil + change as opposed to the 130 mil they're willing to pay for the Rafale. I'm sure they can use the 7 billion they save in all the R & D their little heart desires. :-)
Which is 100 mil for a Rafale.
You can have it as soon as the 6th generation aircrafts replace it. :D
In retrospect, that comment was uncalled for. But did you happen to read post #8 about Obama licking Israel? I mean, that poster was just rude. Wonder who that was?
Yeah, 3 weeks ago I was Vietnamese, 2 weeks ago, I was indian, another gentleman asked if I was a Jew, and now I'm Iranian. I...
I know you're a little butthurt right now. But when that passes, I hope you'll see that Bibi is the one who screwed you over. I mean, what kind of low-life, scumbag goes behind the back of their biggest ally's head of state and addresses their congress? And all for gaining political mileage back...
You're buying 'cause you think there's money to be made. If you're doing it out of generosity, why don't you try some Somali govt bonds? They pay a lot higher interest than the US treasury bonds.
Robotics fixes productivity. It doesn't lead to consumption so while a robot reduces the cost of...
First of, you have to take what I'm saying with a grain of salt :hang3:. I'm in a firefight with a less than competent poster. So I kinda need you to look the other way for a bit.
I do agree with you that people tend to magnify China's problems. However, it's the price you pay for being the...
Lol ok! When they have 3 times as much of this "real wealth", lemme know 'cause that's what 300 millions Americans have.
We don't "owe" you shit. You invested because you that it was a good idea. Feel free to sell and get out anytime you like. You own a tiny piece (6%) of the debt. The...
Considering China's aging population, lack of wealth and the fact that their current income levels are 5 times less than the US, your advise of using common sense might be something you might want to seriously consider, perhaps even more than me?
I think we covered this is post #54 when I wrote I don't see things change that much in 50 years. Like I said before, you should really considering reading. It really helps move the debate along.
Thanks for the advise. However, I think it might be more helpful if you learned to read. Maybe then this "I thought you'd know that, being German and all" would make more sense to you. In case it still doesn't, it is regarding growing fast with the help of cheap labor and hitting the proverbial...
Yeah pretty much. Russia is going backward. Once the advantage of producing low cost goods is gone, China's growth growth rate is going to about the same as the US or any other developed country. Its bit of a struggle to move things along once you get to a certain point. I thought you'd know...
You do know that the combined GDP of Russia and China is a little over 2/3rds of the US GDP, right? I hope they take your advise and give this strategy a try. I'd be really curious to see who goes broke first.
Well, he was talking about being the #1 enemy of Russia for the last 65 years. But why try to read and understand the thread when you can jump in with your typical idiotic comment, right?
Are the French the ones that are bragging? The thread was opened by a Chinese poster, you jumped in with how you defeated them in Vietnam, a Bangladeshi chimed in with French always wave the white flag. Don't let nationalism blind you to the fact that their weapons systems are superior to yours...
PRC doesn't control Taiwan so it's a sovereign nation. When you grow a pair and go conquer them, hit me up. I'll take that free education from you. Till them, why don't worry educating the likes of superboy, instead of me?