Yes we have all clearly witnessed the accuracy of your enlightening statements on PAC making jet targets used by Army AD at the start of this thread WindJammie! The medal is yours for being consistent in trying to defend your one goof with load of other continuing goofs. So continue with your...
The further you open your mouth the more your expose yourself! UQAAB is made by GIDS not PAC! Instead of quoting a Newspaper, quote an authentic source like I did from PAC website. And don't tell me about UAV's and Camcopter and Cybaero (that crashed) Sonny Boy, I was there on board PNS...
And you need to really stop childishly believing such listed fairy tales. ABABEEL is designed and made by SATUMA and BAAZ is simply the local name for FALCO UAV. And there is no mention of any TARGET DRONES on PAC website at https://www.pac.org.pk/products.
Again, you read wrong. PAC DOES NOT MAKE TARGET DRONES. Other Givernment and Semi Government setups do as indicated above in a few posts. The recent AD exercise used Chinese made jet target drone S200 and S300 which were purchased last year. Lastly, no company in Pakistan has yet made an...
Wrong information! PAC is not manufacturing jet target drones. The ones you have shown above are Chinese manufactured jet drones purchased by Army AD last year!
DG ISPR by virtue of his defined constitutional role should not be on Twitter on any other Social Media platform in the first place. Only place for issuance of any information related to military matters should be in the Ministry of Defense and under the Defense Minister office. So Twitter...
Thanks but don’t need any tags. First rule of combat is never underestimate your adversary and if I can think of 30 ways to knock this rolling bugger out, so can they.
Frankly I have some combat experience and I most certainly don’t feel threatened by this RATTLER. I know of so many ways to knock it out that I don’t know where to begin. It’s maybe a nice toy but I do not see it working successfully in combat situations in its current form.
Frankly in this stage and slow speed of this autobot, one grenade explosion from its blindside will impale it for good. In today’s world if you want to make something, make it better than what already exists. This RATLLER is primarily for CQB clearance but it is highly susceptible to enemy...
Be specific? Plenty of times when & where, how many casualties? And yes Mi-17's can be equipped with SAR ops, Russian forces use Mi-17 for SAR ops as its not rocket science!
How many a times an Mi-17 full of soldiers has gone down in PAF history to justify having 14 AW139 helicopters? And why not send another Mi-17 to do the job? Why do you need and AW139? So lets not justify using the wrong arguments for wrong reasons
Frankly I am at a loss for words as to why has PAF opted for this helicopter for SAR ops? First, its very expensive to own and maintain. Second, its too big a target to operate behind enemy lines in comparison to the Allouette. The best choice would have been the smaller and cheaper version...
Is the name RATTLER derived from its loud rolling sound that will alert the enemy that something is approaching their position? Looks like a basic system, a little unstable for hilly terrain & limited capacity to carry the ammunition container on board
Simple. Economics. The numbers required by the local forces are very low and hence do not justify investment into a new build. Cheaper to buy them from those already producing them in other parts of the world.
Not very re assuring explanation. RPA the manufacturer of Rangemaster has not announced anything. I have not heard anything of this sort in my professional circle. If we take the 'every soldier' explanation at face value, than the question is who is manufacturing it and where? Only POF in...
Unlikely. One because of the already inducted Wang Loong MALE from China and Two because AWC also has a MALE ready for operations. PN is already using the LUNA and UQAB UAV's and for Maritime Surveillance they are venturing for Jet LRMPA's. A MALE UAV does not fit into their operational...