Search results

Yes it does. It clearly identifies Hindus as 'extremists' while Muslims as victims. The particular para is conditioning the impressionable minds to think of Hindus in a particular unflattering manner while subtly instilling a sense of victimhood. It doesn't have to, nor does it need to.

The paragraph that you quoted, is soft pedaling a subtle bias against Hindus. Having noted that 'Muslims and Hindus had lived as neighbours and compatriots for over a thousand year', it goes on to state that during partition, 'peaceful Indian society' got divided into 'moderates and extremists'...

Tweaking something that our beloved Santro said, once upon a time: The topic I believe is Pakistan and child education in Pakistan.

Apparently PAF, at one point in time, during Operation Black Thunderstorm, was actually using Mr Google Earth. So says Sir Buzz Killington. Ouch!

Just a thought: The almost juvenile glee among the Pak members gives a funny impression that PA/PAF/PN don't have the ability to gather information about something as trivial as helipads near LoC, and that they wouldn't have known the existence of these super secret helipads if it were not...

^^ How was my post a flamebait.

Where did you expect it to make 'headlines'? Somalian media? Anyway, since the Pakistanis are climbing over each others' shoulders to thank India, it appears they haven't met one good friend of mine. Here, let me introduce him to you guys. Pakistanis. Meet Mr Google Earth. Mr Google Earth...

In other words, you are just being yourself. Q.E.D

And how exactly did you get know 'most' of these Indians. Oh wait. You are just being yourself.

How has the doctor abrogated, subverted, suspended or held in abeyance, the Pakistani Constitution and/or attempted or conspired to do such, by co-operating with CIA to catch OBL?

The scary part is that this gentleman is the chairman of Indus Basin Water Council (Pakistan).

And the relevance of this is what, exactly? Or did you just release that jammed up wind, all at once.

In Bengali there is a saying: nijer mathay jol porey, onner mathay chata dhorey. Rough translation: While it is pouring down on one's head, he is holding his umbrella over someone else's head. :lol:

NO. I am saying Guardian is in error. Whether that error is intentional or inadvertent is not the issue, and quite frankly, I couldn't care less. And yes, Guardian would ordinarily be considered as impartial, but that doesn't mean that they are beyond critical review.

My version is: One Bengali is a poet Two Bengalis is a film society Three Bengalis is a 'inclub jindabad' ["long live revolution"] Four Bengalis is two political parties. I guess, any committee or club works too.

You do realise that while our leaders were following the principles of NAM (however flawed it was) Jinnah saab was bending over backwards wooing the Americans. You do realise that it was Pakistan which willingly became a pawn of the West, to fight the 'evil' communists. You do realise that the...

What I like about bilal is that he knows everything about everything.

Not really. The Guardian link is claiming that WikiLeaks is saying such things. The problem is, WikiLeaks doesn't have any such cable. I suggest, you quit clinging on to that straw, and stress a little bit on comprehension.

Rubbish. The first link is from Express Tribune and talks of Pakistani MP's mental gymnastics. The Guardian article is merely quoting Maj Gen Niazi, a FC commander and there is no such WikiLeak cable where US and/or British intelligence 'broadly agree' on Indian involvement in Balochistan...