Search results

The weight of those tanks doesn't matter. The terrain of South Asia doesn't suit heavy MBTs.

Being heavy is a problem if the terrain is unsuitable. In an Indo Pak conflict, the armies will face a huge number of canals, boggy fields and rivers. How is the Arjun going to navigate through them?

Don't you think the Chinese would've upgraded their army too?

Please do wake up and once in a while open a news paper. Even an Indian one will be an achievement for ill informed people. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/exclusive-on-overweight-next-gen-arjun-tanks-drdo-chief-says-they-missed-the-point/1/629489.html...

They have also placed a wide ranging disclaimer on their data which says that it is an estimate only and doesn't even confirm delivery.

The only way Arjun can beat T-90 is if it accidentally sat on one some day. It is so heavy that the Indian army cannot even transport it to the battlefield, let alone beating a T-90.

As I said earlier, Wikipedia is not the most reliable source, and in any case, there are many powerful forces which have a vested interest in discrediting Saddam Hussein. Iraq neither had the capacity to absorb such a huge number of weapons (1000 fighter bomber fleet??), nor is there clear cut...

Keep day dreaming and rewriting history. China was building a road in Doklam and India got scared. What should one do that will not scare Indians?

You were sitting comfortably in 1962 thinking China will not attack? Do you even know anything about the 1962 war?? India had set up border posts well inside the Chinese territory and China kept warning India not cross the limits. Your leaders thought they could ignore the warnings and somehow...

Just like you have young Afghani boys as Bacha Bereesht in Afghanistan today.

It seems as if either you are unaware of the actual facts, or else you are intentionally ignoring them to satisfy your own ego. But that doesn't alter the actual facts. The Indian army did cross the border to stop the Chinese from building the road. There was a border. It has been that way since...

7 Billion $ worth of weapons? Annually? In the 1980s? Do you really believe that figure?

It is not hard to see why Kashmiris demand freedom from a country and separation from a people that has no social connection to them.

I am not a keyboard warrior who will write whole articles over here, but the fact remains that Iran received support from as many external actors as Iraq, and it accepted quite a bit of equipment during the Iran-Iraq war. If you are unaware of the Iran-contra affair, you can read the following...

I don't need to be biased as I have no stake in this. 1. Whether it is disputed or not, the fact remains that the Doklam has been administered by the Chinese side since the 1890 agreement and so that is a part of the status quo. Until it is formally resolved, that is the line that has to be...

All of this was over a period of time. In the same period, Iran got reinforcements too, including weapons and support from Israel to continue its fight against Iraq.

Yes that is a sad fact that the Arabs have been irresponsible with their wealth.

He might be a Baathist, and he might have an oppressive state system, but for the Syrians, he is the only defender of their lives right now. Sir I also thought so but now I see that the most potent weapon Israel has is vociferous propaganda. It forces people to believe that it is invincible...

Wikipedia is not a great source. Any over zealous person can fudge the facts and figures to suit their own argument, and it is clear where these figures have come from. As an example, Iraq never had the capacity to operate 1000 fighter bombers in its entire history. Having a large air force is...

You lied when you boasted that the Doklam belongs to Bhutan. Twisting facts and rewriting history has become a national habit of Indians. It is at max a disputed territory and has been under Chinese administration since at least 1890 officially. Actually the problem with you Day Dreamers is...