Search results

so you're saying that we can build subs from scratch, basically manufacture. but we can't design a new sub, or advance it because there's no R&D? Don't we have sonars, some submarine equipment made in Pakistan? I mean if we can make a hull, the rest should be easy. We can possibly send...

well, it's our fault. you'd be surprised what the pashtuns of the area think about the TTP laws. they claim that they receive "immediate justice", whereas corruption is rampant when the taliban are not there. People can file cases against bribes, corruption, land disputes, theft, murder, but...

well, the video was supposed to be a joke about the plans of the US for "estabilishing democracy around the world by force." surprisingly, Seth MacFarlane, creator of Family Guy, who by the way voices Peter, Brian (his real voice), Quagmire, and Stewie, was supposed to be the victim of one of...

alright ladies, break it up. this catfight has gone on long enough, sometimes it's fun to watch a catfight, but it gets annoying after a while. you guys both have real experience with navies. one is in the position to tell us what the pakistan navy can do, has, etc. one is in the position...

"dude" i'm alright, you need to chill out. you've been screaming, "the ISI must be destroyed now!" besides, I never agreed with Narayan's allegations. I said if the "ISI WAS behind the attack". Emphasis on "WAS" . Please do prove that the agency was behind it and please use a source that's not...

Why should we take his word? Agnostic is right, if he can't back it up, his words are worthless, we don't need his wisdom right now. no way, why would we do that? India was behind many attacks on our soil, if the ISI WAS behind the attack, it's an eye for an eye. You're dreaming, get real...

first of all, Pakistan's ISI did not create the Taliban. a normal person who claimed to have a dream, guiding him to kill a tribal who raped boys, created the Taliban. Pakistan supported Hekmatyar, who led the Pakhtun faction of the Mujahideen against Masood who led the Tajik part. That's...

there's no hiding the fact that the Chinese govt. commits these horrible acts against our own. which is why I think Pakistan should look carefully at their relations with China, it's far too "one-sided". it would be a better idea to strike a deal with them and take in their uighur prisoners...

yes, exactly, as much as YOU know. most bengalis will make themselves look like the innocent. Biharis don't even have access to the media to explain what exactly happened to them. while bengalis can make up a bunch of horsecrap about what happened! they slaughtered anyone they could dump...

no way, I will never apologize to these worthless people! My mother's family used to live in East Pakistan and continued to live there for a short while even after it became bangladesh. although I don't come from a Bihari background, my mother always sympathizes with them. No one...

sorry guys, but that would give india total domination over the entire sub-continent. this is what happens when you appoint a jahel thug like Zardari, who by the way wanted to sell Pakistan as a virgin girl to India, as the head of pakistan. PPP, thru their religion's founder, Zulfiqar Ali...

if it's sacred to Hindus, then I don't think there should be any question of tearing it down. build the dam elsewhere or figure out something, that's all I think we should do. we have to protect it, as muslims. we can't possibly hope to project ourselves amongst other people in a positive...

what are you doing here?

which is why you should have bothered reading the article. I provided a source at the bottom, I even gave the date, author, issue, everything. Using sources doesn't only mean using links to websites, it also includes books, encyclopedias, periodicals, newspapers, academic journals, and so...

Agnostic, my apologies for dragging this on a bit, but I can't hold back. this is basically picking a bone with me. nitesh said, "Why can't you accept that there is no proof that this capability exist." :rofl: woah! wait a minute, hold on? what?:what: what do you mean, I can't accept...

gandhara was not an indian civilization, some people need to stop laying claims on everything. let's stop making stuff up here, thank you.

well it was reported by Jang newspaper in 2002, so don't bother going thru their archives. i did that already, they only have articles for 2008 in their so-called archive. all the other years are gone. however, it's been confirmed. don't expect any more information, this is Pakistan, no...

it's been transferred already, end of story. whatever it may have been, it has come to pass. it can, but there's nothing wrong with estabilishing a base on our soil. that would help us out a bit as well. go google PAKSAT and Boeing, educate yourself before you criticize the author. I think...

go look up PAKSAT, it was developed by Boeing originally for Indonesia, not Pakistan. Instead, Pakistan ends up using it, genius. are any writers accurate in reporting this kind of stuff? oh wait... are any indian writers accurate when reporting indian defense-related material? you...