You need to travel and see things. Have you ever been to the Gulf countries and the expats there? Have you ever seen Turkish coastal towns, where I personally know several British people have bought holiday homes and settled for years?
Not all. Several US committees have invited Kashmiri people to testify about the internet blockade, jailing of elected leaders & Indian army shootings.
But several congress people have probably been lobbied and paid to say something positive for India because their reputation is declining.
It’s nothing to do with either of them and is the internal affair of China and its allies. As the Indians love to cry about ‘internal affairs’ when it comes to Kashmir etc
Your fellow countrymen were insulting and talking about rape, bagging Kashmiri girls and other disgraceful language. It is your level of quality that you should point at.
Unfortunately following the removal of A370 and crackdown in Kashmir there were many Indian posters celebrating marrying Kashmiri girls and saying some disgusting things, even from previously ‘balanced’ members. The Mods had little choice.
Why are so many Indians paying smugglers to leave India? And before some Indian says Pakistan is just as bad, none of us claim to be an economic power.
BD needs to accelerate military modernisation and boost Chinese co operation once Hasina is booted out of her appeasement. They can’t be trusted, but BD’s long border is India’s achilles heel.
Yep, they shot themselves in the foot. But in regards to partition they seem to think they were hard done by. If you look at the partition map of Punjab, so many Muslim majority areas were kept by Radcliffe in India. They bent over backwards to appease Congress and Nehru hoodwinked them all that...
I have read in numerous places that the areas of Sindh were in exchange for the Muslim majority areas of Punjab (Kapurthala, Ferozepur, Gurdaspur etc) that Radcliffe decided to give to India.
Bear in mind - Pakistan did not receive even one district that had a non Muslim majority in West...
If Kashmir acceded to India then Junagadh & Hyderabad is still legally Pakistan, remember that before you expose your double standards and doublespeak.
Exactly, that is the reality. Congress was clever & shrewd you must give them that. Nehru and the others convinced the British that India...
Baloch plateau is around 40% of Pakistan, and not suitable for large scale migrations. You simply could not have had a population transfer of 30m people without taking into account that inhospitable terrain.
And you ask what other region could have been transferred? Well going by partition of...
You didn’t even read the post previous so why should I bother. This is not about Zia or economy. I was talking with one poster that partition should have included a planned population transfer so that minorities would have been exchanged and modern India could have gone down the Hindu state...
You would probably be like Australia politically, with soft right governments dominating for long periods. A lot of recent Asian immigrants to Australia are quite conservative themselves, so if US was multi party then they wouldn’t feel the need to flock to the Dems as much.
It does seem a bit far fetched. Whole BD Hindu families voting and then leaving? No sovereign country could allow people to move back and forth with such little oversight, entering on tourist stays and then working in factories. Does BD even need imported labour?
If true then your govt should...
Land that Pakistan got was mountainous and so hardly could accomodate a full population transfer. It is not possible to house Indian Muslims in Baloch mountains, rather we need more suitable terrain.
Secondly Hindus were not ‘expelled’ from Pakistan. That is just complete fake news, in fact...