Search results

NEW DELHI: The US on Friday said the terrorist groups responsible for attacks in India, including in Mumbai recently, have 'origin' and 'links' in Pakistan and hoped the anti-terror joint mechanism proposed to be set by the two neighbours would produce results. US Assistant Secretary of State...

People might have been slightly unfair to nehru (referring to the article) but the fact remains that he WAS easily manipulated by the british C-in-C.He was the prime minister so he shud have been in control. In 1962 it was the chinese who managed to make a monkey out of him with their "Hindi...

Yes.But since the deal is between the US and India its upto the US to decide if we're clean.If they think we are clean we are clean as far as this deal goes. If they think pakistan is also clean they'll give u a deal too as has been demanded by the pakistani govt.

Why exactly do u want to do that?? To put Taliban back in power in Afghanistan.As a newspaper columnist you wud be well aware of the pathetic conditions which existed in Afghanistan under the taliban rule.The condition of women were especially apalling. And u want to support these barbarians...

What are your terms?? India wants the current ground positions of the two armies to be clearly demarcated and accepted by both sides b4 any withdrawal.To date pakistan hasnt accepted that.

That's why they made it amply clear that unless India separates its civilian and nuclear reactors there wud be no nuke deal. So we can safely assume that if the US congress approves of the deal India has been successful in separating the two.

U'r logic shud apply to balochistan too then.Is pakistan forcibly occupying balochistan??Ask u'rself.

That would put u directly against the USA.Pakistan cant afford that.Infact no country can.

The problem with withdrawal is there is no guarrantee that the other side will not take advantage of the situation and move in their forces.We will lose everything and wud have to sit looking like jackasses.That's why india is pushing for official demarkation of the current positions of the two...

The countries "thinking of empowering India " have also been guilty of proliferation right from Klaus Fuchs giving away info on the manhattan proj to russia.They are on no moral high ground.

Well u also earn ten times the salary of a taxi driver probably more.

Atheism is fine.I'm a bit of an atheist myself.But that doesnt mean u can insult a religion.

Yes but in 2002 it was pakistan which managed to successfully deter india. India Today had run a cover story on this "When India came close to war.". It says during the 2002 confrontation Indian commanders had drawn up detailed plans to conduct an operation acros the border.They had analysed...

Great work guys! Some really good info on both positive and negative aspects of Indian economy.

Man!! The exact same case exists with Air India.It was started by one of the greatest indian industrialists J.R.D.Tata.When he used to run it AI was one of the best airlines in the world. But the socialism obsessed indian govt. nationalised it and inevitably ruined the whole thing.They are...

Forgive my ignorance but what is WoT??

I disagree. :disagree: It was precisely bcoz of the fear that cross-border strikes on terrorist camps may lead to a nuclear war that actual war never happened in 2002 despite the armed forces pressuring the govt. to act tough.After the parliament attack morale among indian troops was high and...

I wud have agreed if the RAW actually had such a capability.Firstly it should be the IB(intelligence bureau) u should be pointing fingers at not RAW. Secondly neither RAW nor IB is as effective as the ISI.They simply dont have the ability to do what pakistan is accusing them of.If they did have...

What the BJP actually asked the govt. to do was be more transparent in the dealings with pakistan.If it had been a joint statement instead of kasuri alone talking and if both sides had stated exactly what the "solution" cud be there was no reason for the opposition party to complain.

I dont understand this new fad of creating cartoons of Prophet muhammed. What are they trying to convey?? What if someone tomorrow draws obnoxious cartoons of jesus christ and starts publishing them??