You are right about learning that point, we need to learn every weaknesses for Pantsir and other captured systems. I meant to use that knowledge to develop our systems. We don't need to use that knowledge on our systems, but we can teach that weak points our attack forces
Actually we don't need to study Pantsir ADS. Turkey has HİSAR O which is more capable of than PANTSIR. Especially our radars better than Russian export models. Russia denied the demolition of Pantsir during the Idlib operations. But they announced to a newer version with UAV detection capability.
I am a person who serves this country without political distribution.
This is a mistake. And I can't defend this decision with some political arguments.
General Yayci became really successful and well known, his success is a problem some western countries which also support feto.
Yeni Şafak works like a fake news producer in case of any mistake of AK Party. Yeni Şafak will always protect AK Party's decision.
Yayci was active duty, he was getting all the credits about EEZ works, AK Parti management saw the situation and made him passive with all cost.
This is a really passive position. There is something wrong about this decision.
I guess his name became more popular and then they decided to hide his success.
Their development purposes are different so their designs are different. Gökdoğand and Bozdoğan a2a systems so their launch systems require different energy than land based air defence systems HİSAR A and O. Just think about SATURN V rocket which carried Apollo 11. If you need to resist gravity...
T129 as you know the attack helicopter which producing under the agreement with old Agusta Westland cooperation.
T625 or GOKBEY is a multipurpose helicopter comparable with UH-1 series
T629 is the light attack version of T625 GOKBEY
Baykar or any other companies must export their product. Otherwise, producing for the domestic market is not as cost-effective as it assumed. @SgtGungHo mentioned that most probably, Ukraine will get some AKINCI as part of the engine deal. But that engine option will open new markets for us.
Yes, I know that problem. But engine issue is commonly known by the community.
If we want to export T129 without any restriction we need to domesticate it with all crucial components. At least we need to find a second producer for them. We can replace some sub-components easily but engine and...
We cant make a rental agreement for T129 due to engine licence issues.
However, TEI's engine will start flight test later this year. Might be we can offer domestic engine version with extended delivery plan.
I need to change my personal information. I did mistakenly choice the UK for where I am from. But I am from Turkey, I live in the UK. Can you change that info?
OTOKAR was the best option, BMC was favoured because of political reasons.
You can not make this another way.
Ethem Sancak's interview says more than you what you said.
TUSAS has a significant amount of experience with F110 engine capabilities. Only TUSAS involved the TRMotor yet, but my guess TRMotor will be reshaped and TEI will also be part of it soon.
Actually key name is Taha Yasin Öztürk.
Otokar was the right choice for this production. They were realistic. Now BMC is responsible for every delay. We can easily blame it because of the political background. Previously BMC was a good company before it gets political tool.
KOC Holding...