Search results

The reason being that the act is seen as a snub to the current establishment.

Really dude, what's up? The "movements" that you are talking about are nothing but slide shows. The Maoists are more like dacoits; you have no clue how unpopular they are. The NE is more pissed off with Bangladeshis than the GoI. The South and the North (where most of the country) lives is...

Seriously, what? You think anything of that sort is going to happen?

Ah... the tripple-bisceped Pathan Dragon... Run for your lives...

This from the previous writeup: 1) Fringe groups (refering to the extremists) 2) Chhattisgarh has an expansionist evangelist movement in full swing 3) Christian converts often claim to be Hindus for fear that they'll lose their rights to the government jobs and university spots that...

You are shying away. Why agree to something if you can't defend? I know that... but does that not contradict your "all low caste Hindus are poor and oppressed" rhetoric? You really should read more about the caste-system. Its not as simple as you think. It is a prejudice that you...

So you see paralleles between 1947 and the current situation? Please elaborate...

You agree with him, don't you? So why shy away from "defending?" Again, so there is no "Muslim high class?" Are there no "low-caste Hindus" who are very rich? Again, you are entertaining a prejudice... In other words, your figures ought to be discarded.

So stop taking his opinion as holy scriptures. Ofcourse these do, in sections of the Indian society; does that imply we Indians or most Indians are fanatics? Yes it is there; but is it going away? Yes. You counted? No; again a prejudice and wrong assumption. Again... did you count?

and these things can whoop some arse...

That guy knows shyt about Hinduism, and neither do you anything about Hinduism. The fellow has taken casteism to a whole new conspiracy level. India is not held hostage by Brahmins; I sometimes wonder when will you realise it.

Honestly AM, I do not think you are at any higher moral ground; your posts are as jingoistic as ours. As far as compromises go, the Article 370 is the biggest compromise we could have ever offered. There was never any question that the region deserves Article 370 (it does); however, I doubt...

Gee... woman... where do you get these gems from?

True, but in a very dilute form. Its a two-way street though.

Subtle racism: I do not hate you but I'd like it if you were at an arm's length. Same is the case with Hindus and Muslims in India. The people who refused the houses on religious grounds did not "hate" Muslims but would like it if they are kept at an arm's length. What they do not realise is...

What she has said is that this phenomenon exists, and that this phenomenon is not concsious. I hope you get the difference; that is why I mentioned "subtle racism." There is no concsious effort herein. PS: My society contains many Muslim families.

It is not like all Muslims live in ghettos or in poor societies/localities. Most slums in my city are mixed; same goes for appartments and localities. Some areas are pre-dominantly Hindu and some are pre-dominantly Muslim; both are equally good/bad. But what Shabana Azmi has said is...

Gee... jumping the gun are we?

What are you talking about? Please get out out of your Indo-phobia...

How is that article anti-India?