Search results

Attempt to change the fact by renaming trick is commonly used in Vietnamese. the word "Cotuang" recorded in the literature。 Beginning Vietnam translated the word as "金沙"; later translated as "坝葛鐄”" by changing the translation of the results...

generally there are three ways to resolve disputes 1, negotiations 2, International Arbitration 3, War not mandatory choose international arbitration . If choose International arbitration we have 99.99999% chance take back these two islands（why not 100%?Because in reality can not...

You are a notorious Vietnamese, vietnamese people are all proud of you，once again I see you ,Welcome, welcome.

to add that any party in Vietnam did not have SOVEREINGTY over the Island（Including South Vietnam）.

ChineseRobinHood This Vietnamese have more than one ID,and all ID is posing Chinese ,already has long been notorious why? Very simple, generally there are three ways to resolve disputes 1, negotiations 2, International Arbitration 3, War use international arbitration is not...

It seems that you can not deny my argument. If you can, please point out where I was wrong. Can you? You can't, so you not replied. Well, you are truly participate in the discussion, not as some Vietnamese, already participate in the discussion several times and already with the...

where i said North Vietnam and Socialist Republic of Vietnam are one government? Please find the evidence, Do not imagine making out the words I did not say! i said is : 1977 coalition government includes North Vietnam and Viet Cong . and the coalition government continues to recognize...

You really are an idiot?you no island give us. why? You can not differentiate silent and recognized. You are an idiot! ! 1977 Prime Minister of Vietnamese coalition government mentioned "we", "our" in the formal diplomatic .i think only idlot still think he is representative of the...

It's no logical. again you no island give us. All of the above mean that the international community admit thiese two island is dispute. for a claim , you can admit or silence or opposition, only Vietnamese make silence equal admitted. Your premise is wrong, no one admitted to any party...

On your question relating to the Vietnamese ， I have answer in this thread already, if you can, please point out my error, if you can't, then you should shut up! !

no ,your no islands give ,because your not own these two island,no one admit your own these two island. if no one oppose it, it means they admit it---->first ：China at the meeting no representatives two:This is conditional, must continue a long time no objection. The international...

you can not argue my argument, so you can only say so. you can get pdf file form this link Check I said is true or false

You participate in the discussion many times, including these two islands is clear, really do not understand why you have to lie

Another way of saying that is no one admit you own these two islands, can you tell me ,who admit your claim?? your can't use a no one recognize claim as a Excuse。 MEMORANDUM Outlining Vice-Premier Li Xiannian's Talk with Premier Pham Van Dong on June 10, 197 7 you can see...

china claim include two island no one recognize South Vietnam or Viet Cong or north Vietnam own these two islands 1977 Vietnamese coalition government still recognize this is a coalition government statement.

I have answered you many many times 1 、So North Vietnam never have any right over Paracel---》》not need you get(because no one recognize you own these two islands.) but you can recognize our claim 2、Not only South Vietnam have the sovereignty over Paracel, Viet Cong...

No matter what name is called, also belongs to China， even if you call it Hanoi sea , but also belongs to China.

:china:Who is proud to be a cheater , who should be hit.:flame: Ungrateful（Alias​​: Vietnamese）definition： who promise something X belong to someone but X is controlled by someone's enemy at then who get something X from someone's enemy...

I have read and fully understand ， your excuse is full of loopholes. .

Say these are useless, when two sides are realy fighting ,both side will not consider how much loss, but the result is already clear.