Yet we built it ourselves. Current day Indians had nothing to do with the formation of Taxila. Romans actually went to Britain to build those walls, current day Ganga Indians never came all the way to Taxila to build the city and its university. How you reached such a comparison is beyond...
Mulk asaan na, history asaan ni, rehnnn alay asaan ne ancestors teh hunn asi, magar thekaydaar tusaan? Chal hunn nass.
Because it was built by Romans. Taxila wasn't built by Haryanvis, Ganga, Yamuna people. It was built by the local Gandharans(modern day Potoharis and Hindkowans). How the hell...
Sir if it was up to these banias, they would even sell their sisters to the angraiz; whom they wish to impress so hard. After all, they were not only ruled for 300 years, but also dominated and treated like dog !@#$. We Pakistanis were also ruled for 100 years, but were treated in a much better...
Without radio carbon dating, it is impossible to tell who ate those animals. I mean the Hindu Shahis later took over the region, and they might have been hostile towards the buddhists.
Regardless, the area was predominantly Buddhist, and Buddhist shrines have been found as far south as Chakwal...
Lol yaar. This debate was of an anthropological and historical sense. No need to bring politics into it. And as far as Afghan nationals are concerned, they consider even Margalla Hills to be a part of Greater Afghanistan, despite the region not having any Pashtun descended tribe. And that is...
The "most recent research" on Saraswati in the link was done in 2002, and cited in the website called "hindunet.org". Haha. Hindu nuts should be banned from this forum just like muslim extremists are.
Most Khattars don't claim a Pashtun ancestry, but some revisionists have started exploring it considered all Khattars use the "Khan" surname, which to the gullible masses means a Pashtun ancestry.
But most Khattars I believe claim a mythological descent from Qutub-Shah through a son named...
Do you have any source to back up your claims? I need proper geological studies, not some crappy Indian science. By all studies, Ghaggar Hakra has been a seasonal naala since the past 11000 years. And are these two naalas(Ghaggar and Hakra) even connected to form a proper river?
And man, I...
The "Tanolis" in Ghazni are "Taniwals". Tribes can have similar names, which doesn't specify an origin. Why I don't believe Tanolis to be a Pashtun race is the fact that they gave differing accounts of themselves to the Brits, with one source linking them to Dhund Abbassis. The second thing...
Of course, neither are Karlals and Dhund Abbasis. Tanolis are also of local extraction, but claiming a Pashtun origin nowadays. These days even some Khattars of Attock have started claiming a Pashtun origin. Whenever a tribe in Hazara+Potohar region gets confused of their origin, they start...
It either didn't exist at all, or was somewhere else for it was said to be as mighty as Indus. Do you think that laughable, seasonal "naala" like Ghaggar Hakra is as mighty as Indus? Gimme a break.
Both the rivers are in Afghanistan, idiot.
A good 70% of Attock people according to my estimate speak Chakwal style, hindko influenced Potohari. The dialects have their own names like Ghebi, Awankari etc. The variants of Potohari spoken throughout the salt-range are more or less the same, whether you are in Attock or Chakwal. Saying that...
Attock wasn't a part of "Hazara Qarlugh" under the mughal administration. It was governed by the Gakhars, who according to Ain-e-Akbari defeated the local Awan, Jodhra and Khattar tribes. The hindko speaking of Attock is only the Chach illaqa around Hazro city. The Pindigheb, Fatehjhang, Wah...