There wouldn't be any intention for "joint development" if the US didn't intervene.
It would appear that the Chinese here still don't view SKS as another Falklands.
I don't understand why the Vietnamese here believe that Cambodia is under their sphere of influence. Cambodia is economically and militarily dependent on the US and China. Laos is a Viet puppet though.
Where do you guys source your 2 2012 indigineous carriers from...? Photoshop? CD? Mashup?
I'll be darned if I see more than 3 carriers by the end of this decade...
1) It is puerile and ironic to complain about racism on the internet.
2) It is naive to complain about Chinese racism against Vietnamese. The ruler always disdains the ruled. You can conclude from Japan's contempt for Chinese that Japanese feel superior -- and indeed they are as they occupied...
You guys have always had Indian members reviving the Tibetan issue.
Now you have Vietnamese re-igniting the SKS dispute.
It would make a complete set when an influx of Taiwanese or Japanese make the case for Taiwan independence.
Where are the Indians and Vietnamese?
Except Chinese aren't some Vietnamese under American flags who would nuke a carrier group in the Taiwan Straits.
PS: DF-21 is not an ICBM so why would it come with nuclear retaliation?
No. Russia is East European, along with its other European Soviet Republics.
You need basic wiki education.
Western world - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No. Japanese sources also said China was producing nuclear powered aircraft carriers. Japanese media declarations of Chinese military capabilities are one of the few areas they have no credibility in.
Yeah. Cost control is the only viable cause for this acquisition. American trainers are state-of-the art, but they aren't nessessary for fresh cadets.
This may kick off some domestic competition too.
No, the Chinese government tacitly encourages anti-Japanese protests. It keeps the attention away from other domestically-induced greviances. It's a communist trademark conduct. The fact that the Chinese communist party is not hesitant in directing domestic anger towards Japan evidences China's...
No no no. You got the order wrong.
1) 111 BCE - 1644 AD Han Chinese rule
2) 1645 - 1886 Manchu Chinese vassalage
3) 1887 - 1954 Imperial French colonialism
4) 1955 - 1975 America unapologetically massacres 3 million Vietnamese
5) 2011 Cannot break VN-US cooperation
...is an accurate...